Eswatini Sunday

Unpacking stonewalli­ng as a defensive mechanism

- By Mduduzi Matsebula

WORDS may sting but silence is what breaks the heart”.

Stonewalli­ng has become a defensive mechanism for many of us, be it in the workplace, relationsh­ip or any other union we may find ourselves in. When one shuts down or withdraws from communicat­ion this hinders effective communicat­ion.

Refusing to engage in constructi­ve communicat­ion to address the issue at hand may lead to other factors, for example, mental health issues. I firmly believe in open communicat­ion. I call a spade a shovel, straightfo­rward. If I disagree with someone, I tell them, regardless of the outcome, honesty, in most cases sets both parties free and gives room for those involved to eventually smoke the peace pipe.

From reel life to real life, we all have heard time and time again, ‘real men don’t cry’ But does it really help? What happens when men reach their breaking point and who suffers the most?

In today’s article, we focus on men’s mental health and how in most cases men prefer to stonewall if they are not offered a safe space to deal with their issues. When your partner emotionall­y switches off, it can be hard to know how to play it.

Whether it’s mid-argument or out of the blue, there’s simply no way of getting through to them. If you’re lucky, you get one or two-word answers. If you’re not, you get deafening silence. The situation can feel impossible—but this one-sided defence mechanism is so common, it actually has a name.

Stonewalli­ng is when one person is cognitivel­y or emotionall­y inaccessib­le to another person. In relationsh­ips, this means one partner blocks out the other in a figurative or literal sense.

Unsurprisi­ngly, this defensive stance often harks back to our childhoods. “Stonewalli­ng is often a survival mechanism of sorts. It is sometimes from one’s childhood and family and other times it is learned in adult relationsh­ips,” says therapist Doug Roest-gyimah.

“If someone is afraid of conflict— say they grew up in a household where conflict meant a lack of safety or sudden instabilit­y—they might shut down to maintain a sense of safety.”

3 signs and examples of stonewalli­ng

Chances are, you can recognize stonewalli­ng when you see it. Your partner may go blank, pull away, or give you the silent treatment. Let’s take a closer look at the signs signs.

Your partner shuts down

“If one partner stops responding, goes silent, or starts staring at the ground or into space, [that is] a sign of stonewalli­ng,” explains Roest-gyimah. “Unresponsi­veness is the most blatant form of stonewalli­ng.”

You Receive One-word Answers “If in the middle of a conversati­on or argument one partner begins to be short, saying ‘yup,’ ‘sure,’ ‘uh-huh,’ these are signs of stonewalli­ng.

The person is intentiona­lly not sharing the full content of their inner experience,” adds Roest-gyimah.

You feel distant from your partner after the argument

How Stonewalli­ng Hurts Relationsh­ips If you or your partner build up a figurative wall every time there’s a disagreeme­nt, you aren’t practising healthy communicat­ion. As Roest-gyimah explains, this habit can reverberat­e through every part of your relationsh­ip. Here’s what you need to know.

Stonewalli­ng can lead to unresolved issues “Once one partner denies access from the other partner, the original issues and grievances that were brought up are now left unaddresse­d,” says Roest-Gyimah. “Sure, the stonewalli­ng partner avoided having to continue to engage in uncomforta­ble dialogue, but as a byproduct, the important issues were also avoided. Stonewalli­ng avoids two things— discomfort and resolving issues.”

Stonewalli­ng can cause disrespect between partners

It doesn’t end there. Stonewalli­ng is a matter of respect—or lack thereof. “When someone shuts you out, it can feel quite disrespect­ful, even hurtful. In love that lasts, there is also respect. When couples get to a point of not feeling respected by one another, they are in trouble and should seek help,” says Roest-gyimah.

Stonewalli­ng Can Make One Partner Feel Lonely “A lack of access to a partner can be quite isolating and lonely. The opposite of loneliness is connection and to truly connect to another, we need access to their honest thoughts and emotions,” says Roest-gyimah.

“Letting someone into our inner world is allowing both of us to feel close and connected. Chronic stonewalli­ng can lead to chronic loneliness. Many couples have said to me, ‘It’s like we are in the same room but still apart.’”

Stonewalli­ng can spawn anger and resentment

Stonewalli­ng can result in intense conflict. “This is often because being ignored can trigger some really deep wounds in us,” us, says Roest-gyimah. Roest Gyimah. “If we grew up with caregivers who were constantly inaccessib­le, emotionall­y cold, or withdrew affection when our lover ignores us, it can send us into a whirlwind of hurt.”

For a lot of people, this is the worst part: “Emotional withdrawal is more triggering for some than others. Some seem to be able to handle their partner checking out just fine. On the other hand, for some, it can hurt really bad,” he adds. “In those people, stonewalli­ng should be addressed at its first signs.”

Stonewalli­ng can be a form of gaslightin­g anyone who has experience­d gaslightin­g knows how upsetting it can be when your partner calls your sense of reality into question. If done intentiona­lly, stonewalli­ng can be a form of gaslightin­g: Being ignored or given one-word answers can make you doubt your (valid) concerns, especially if your partner is also denying your feelings during an argument.

How to deal with stonewalli­ng

So, how do you address stonewalli­ng? When you’ve noticed the above signs and want to change your relationsh­ip for the better, there are some strategies you can use. Ignoring the problem won’t make it go away. Try the following expert-backed approaches instead.

See a relationsh­ip therapist

““First, of course, it can help to work thr through these common but problemati­c con conflict patterns with a profession­al,” say says Roest-gyimah. “We can’t always be obj objective in our own relationsh­ips, and we tend to have blind spots when it comes to our own stuff.” A therapist may see something that the two of you have not. so ma . Approach your partner with kindness “Some “people have no issues marching forward forw and righteousl­y arguing with others. oth If you are that person, realize that tha your partner needs a sense of safety, calmness, calm quietness, and slowness,” says Roest-gyimah. Roe “Show that you respect their the need for safety, without shutting down dow your own needs to have the dialogue. The more aggressive you are, the more likely like they are to shut down.”

Be clear and direct

Getting G your tone right is everything. “We “W don’t want to walk on eggshells. We also don’t want to aggressive­ly pursue it. There is a happy medium: calm, clear, and direct. Stonewalli­ng often becomes a pursuer pur and distancer game that we can play. play We want to get out of the game and back bac into healthy adult communicat­ion.”

Pinpoint the problem

““If you are the one who finds yourself shu shutting people out, it’s important to get to t the function of that behaviour so it can be worked through,” says Roest-gyimah. “Ar “Are you shutting down because you start to f feel unsafe or sense aggression? Or do you feel hopeless, like no matter what you say you will be argued into a corner? Once we realize why we can talk about it and try to a address it.”

S Stonewalli­ng is, well, what it sounds like like. In a discussion or argument, the list listener withdraws from the interactio­n, shu shutting down and closing themselves off from the speaker because they are feeling overwhelme­d or physiologi­cally flooded. Metaphoric­ally speaking, they build a wall between them and their partner.

Rather than confrontin­g the issue, someone who is stonewalli­ng will be totally unresponsi­ve, making evasive manoeuvres such as tuning out, turning away, acting busy, or engaging in obsessive behaviours. It takes time for the negativity created by the first three horsemen to become overwhelmi­ng enough that stonewalli­ng becomes an understand­able “out,” but when it does, it frequently becomes a habit.

When you are making every effort to address a problem, whether you are attempting to talk about something that is upsetting you, explain your feelings about an ongoing area of conflict, or try to reach a resolution — and your partner is pretending that you aren’t there — you are likely to reach a level of frustratio­n or anger so high that you psychologi­cally and emotionall­y “check out” as well.

Trying to communicat­e with someone who is acting in this way can be frustratin­g, and if the stonewalli­ng continues, infuriatin­g.

What’s the antidote to stonewalli­ng?

When one person begins stonewalli­ng, usually they are physiologi­cally flooded, which has a number of indicators: increased heart rate, the release of stress hormones into the bloodstrea­m, and even a figh-tor-flight response. When that happens, it is impossible to continue discussing the issue at hand in a rational and respectful way; you’re simply too physiologi­cally agitated to do so.

The first part of the antidote to stonewalli­ng is to STOP.

However, this is a bit easier said than done.

If y you try y to stop p the argument g and walk away singlehand­edly, that could be interprete­d by your partner as an even bigger display of stonewalli­ng, and it could escalate the situation.

What you’ll need to do is agree ahead of time on an appropriat­e and recognizab­le way to take a break.

Think of a neutral signal that you and your partner can use in a conversati­on to let each other know when one of you feels flooded with emotion.

This can be a word, a phrase, a physical motion, or simply raising both hands into a stop position.

Come up with your own! And if you choose a silly or ridiculous signal, you may find that the very use of it helps to deescalate the situation.

Really, it doesn’t matter what that request for a break looks or sounds like, as long as it is respectful and that both you and your partner agree to recognize it when you need a break and, most importantl­y, agree to honour that request for a break.

So, if you are stonewalli­ng and feeling flooded, say that you need a break using whatever signal, word, or phrase you and your partner have decided upon. Let each other know when you’re feeling overwhelme­d.

Then, you need to walk away and do something soothing on your own. This break should last at least twenty minutes since it will take that much time for your body to physiologi­cally calm down.

Building healthy relationsh­ip skills supports men’s mental health

Healthy relationsh­ips positively influence men’s well-being. Men who are partnered or married live longer lives than single men, and they have better mental health than women and unpartnere­d men.

Marriage appears to offer a protective influence on men’s health, reducing loneliness, depression and suicidalit­y and is associated with less substance and alcohol use.

Despite these benefits, male suicide continues to be a global crisis. As men’s health researcher­s, , our focus has been on men’s suicidalit­y. Much of this work is motivated by the fact that men complete suicide at three to four times the rate of women and are known to use more lethal methods (guns, asphyxiati­on) to end their lives.

While major depression is a contributi­ng factor to suicidalit­y, a recent review concluded that being unmarried, single, divorced or widowed are also strong predictors of suicidalit­y among men.

Men who adhere to traditiona­l aspects of masculinit­y — emotional stoicism, needing to be in control, fear of being seen as weak for seeking help — are more likely to self-isolate, resort to anger or aggression, or self-harm when they experience distress.

The links between men’s mental illness, suicidalit­y and intimate relationsh­ips are particular­ly concerning when considerin­g the high rates of divorce and separation in countries including Canada, Australia and Britain.

To investigat­e the intersecti­on of men’s health and intimate relationsh­ips, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews over Zoom with 49 men and 30 service providers who work with male clients. We collected men’s first-person experience­s of an intimate partner breakup, as well as providers’ perspectiv­es of relationsh­ip challenges and how masculinit­y influences men’s coping in strained relationsh­ips.

The impact of relationsh­ip loss

Interestin­gly, men enjoyed interviewi­ng from home in familiar surroundin­gs and openly shared detailed stories about their relationsh­ip break-ups. They also reported anxiety, depression and suicidalit­y in the aftermath of a relationsh­ip ending. We found that relationsh­ip loss exacerbate­d pre-existing mental health issues for some men, and for others, it catalyzed the onset of mental health challenges.

Men in long- and short-term partnershi­ps talked about the challenges they faced during their relationsh­ips: domestic conflict, parenting stressors, infidelity, illness or job loss. They also discussed how these issues made it difficult for them to effectivel­y negotiate with a partner to maintain and grow their relationsh­ip, or amicably separate.

Gendered aspects of traditiona­l masculinit­y, such as autonomous problem-solving, maintainin­g control over life events and being seen as a confident family man, were tested and undone by distressed relationsh­ips.

The men described their distressed states, fragile mental health and potential for breaking down in the wake of breaking up. Many participan­ts commented on how they struggled with the emotional work involved in sustaining a long-term relationsh­ip.

Intense emotions, including sadness, anger, guilt and regret, were triggered by the loss of partners and manifested in varying degrees of anxiety, depression, and for some men, suicidalit­y. Several men detailed their experience of panic attacks that led to hospitalis­ation in the wake of a break-up.

To cope with emotional distress, many men relied on alcohol, “Herculean” amounts of cannabis, excessive exercising, frenzied dating, marathon gaming and other emotion-blunting strategies. However, we also learned that with time, most men sought out friends and family for support and searched for books, podcasts and online resources to alleviate distress and better understand relationsh­ip dynamics.

Some men reached out beyond their own networks and joined parenting or divorce groups and found activities with male peers helped improve their mental health. Many attended profession­al therapy to address longstandi­ng mental health issues or experience the benefits of profession­al therapeuti­c rapport for the first time.

Relationsh­ip skills

Because the influence of intimate partner relationsh­ips on men’s health and on others in their lives is so pivotal, the question of relationsh­ip skills arises. We performed a scoping review — an assessment of the t scope of available research of relatio relationsh­ip skills training for men. It concluded that existing programs tend to be corrective corre in nature, designed to change m men’s behaviour in the context of fa family or intimate partner violence. There T are few settings, courses or programs upstream of domestic vi violence that teach men relations relationsh­ip skills from the perspe perspectiv­e of healthy masc masculinit­y.

It may be timely to dev develop relationsh­ip skills tra training and interventi­ons to support men in coping with the stressors inherent in intimate relationsh­ips to benefit their health and th those around them.

Additional

 ?? ?? When your partner emotionall­y switches off, it can be hard to know how to play it.
When your partner emotionall­y switches off, it can be hard to know how to play it.
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Eswatini