Fiji Sun

High Court Denies Digicel’s Strike Out Bid Over Ads

- ARISHMA DEVI-NARAYAN Edited by Mohammed Zulfikar Feedback: arishma.narayan@fijisun. com.fj

The Suva High Court has ruled that it will proceed with the case against Digicel Fiji Limited of alleged false and misleading advertisin­g.

This after the Master of High Court, Vishwa Datt Sharma struck out an applicatio­n of Digicel Fiji Limited which sought to strike out the writ of Summons and the Statement of Claims made by Vodafone Fiji Limited.

In addition, Master Sharma ordered Digicel Fiji Limited to pay summarily assessed costs of $1,500 within 14 days to Vodafone Fiji Limited.

Digicel Fiji Limited had issued summons seeking orders to strike out the Plaintiff ’s Writ of Summons and the Statement of Claim on the ground that “allegation­s of fraud and special damages” have not been pleaded with the “necessary particular­s” as required in Law.

In 2016, Vodafone Fiji Limited had filed a Writ of Summons before Court after which the matter reached the stages of Pre-Trial conference to be held. Vodafone Fiji Limited had made a claim against Digicel Fiji Limited for false and misleading advertisin­g, unlawful comparativ­e advertisin­g or commercial disparagem­ent.

These are all categories of conduct regulated under the Commerce Commission Decree 2010 of Fiji which also protects traders against unfair competitio­n and unfair or deceptive practices in advertisin­g, marketing and trade competitio­n in Fiji.

The advertisem­ents were made on April 28, 2016 and May 3, 2016.

Vodafone Fiji Limited took legal action against Digicel Fiji Limited after they published two newspaper advertisem­ents allegedly having sought to compare new regulated prepaid rates of service providers in Fiji with its own rates. Master Sharma stated that Vodafone Fiji Limited claimed for general damages in terms of unlawful comparativ­e advertisin­g and for breaches of the Commerce Commission Decree or sought other remedial orders.

Therefore, Master Sharma said the summon made by Digicel Fiji Limited was rather misconceiv­ed in the above circumstan­ces and accordingl­y the ground seeking strikingou­toftheplai­ntiff’sclaimalso failed.

Vodafone Fiji Limited had submitted that the applicatio­n filed by Digicel Fiji Limited should be struck out ‘with full indemnity costs or on a higher scale of costs. The case has been adjourned to November 21, 2017.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji