Party Opinions

timely basis to inform and educate voters on election matters. These include voting procedures, use of postal ballots, pre-poll voting and the procedures for protecting their electoral rights.

The education programme must also include training of polling agents and information sessions on the responsibilities of political party officials and candidates. However, political parties have not been notified of any programmed activity by the Elections Office on voter education and other related matters. We are almost into April and a start has yet to be made. This is unacceptable.

The conduct of voter education itself is a huge task requiring coverage of all villages and settlements in the country. This could easily take up to three months if properly done, with the required print material distributed for the information of voters.

Furthermore, political parties have a number of pending issues to settle with the Electoral Commission and the Supervisor of Elections, which also must be done well ahead of the elections.

Opposition political parties have been agitating for regular meetings with the FEO to discuss and resolve their concerns, some of which are serious and impinge on the conduct of free and fair elections.

After much dilly-dallying, the Supervisor scheduled a meeting for March 7, requesting the political parties to name their representatives and submit two items each they wished to discuss at the meeting. The parties complied but were informed on March 2 that the meeting had been rescheduled to March 22. No explanation was given. Then on March 20, they were advised by email from FEO that the chairman of the Electoral Commission had postponed the meeting to a later date. No new date was given in the notification nor were any reasons given.

An independent investigation must be conducted into the matter.

The last minute cancellation of scheduled meetings undermines the provisions of section 14(e) of the Electoral Decree, which requires the Commission and the Supervisor to meet regularly with political parties and other stakeholders to update them and discuss matters related to the elections. This is a serious issue and not “minor” as the Commission chairman, Suresh Chandra, chooses to describe it.

Opposition parties want changes to the Electoral Decree and other electoral procedures in line with recommendations made by the Multinational Observer Group in their post 2014 election report and those made by the Electoral Commission in its 2014 Report. Implementation of these recommendations are essential if the 2018 General Election are to be free, fair and credible, unlike the 2014 polls.

The procrastination, and obvious reluctance of the Elections Office to meet with opposition parties to address these pressing concerns, reflect seriously on the independence of the office. When a protest was lodged with the Elections Supervisor and the Commission Chair regarding the unexplained meeting deferments, Supervisor Saneem claimed they were not new matters and had been raised before. Of course, they have been raised before. Opposition parties have been raising them for more than a year but no action has been taken to date to resolve these issues. The matters FLP has submitted for discussion at the meeting include:

The immediate appointment of a multi observer group to evaluate progress made on the recommendations of the 2014 MOG report and to engage with all stakeholders well before the 2018 general elections;

NGO participation in the voter education, training and awareness programme;

Pre-polling to be substituted by use of postal ballot; and

the Appointment of a new Supervisor of Elections.