Duterte Tells UN Expert ‘To Go To Hell’ in Warning Against Interference In Domestic Affairs
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte lashed out on Sunday at another UN human rights expert for making critical remarks about his supposed role in the expulsion of the chief justice, telling him “to go to hell”.
Mr Duterte dismissed the remarks of Diego Garcia-Sayan and told him not to meddle in domestic problems. He was replying to a reporter’s question before flying on a visit to South Korea.
“Tell him not to interfere with the affairs of my country. He can go to hell,” Mr Duterte said.
“He is not a special person and I do not recognise his rapporteur title.”
Mr Garcia-Sayan told reporters in Manila last Thursday that the unprecedented removal of Maria Lourdes Sereno as chief justice after Mr Duterte lambasted her in public is an attack on judicial independence that could put Philippine democracy at risk. Mr Duterte has reacted with similar public outbursts in the past against other UN rapporteurs who raised alarm and sought an independent investigation into his bloody campaign against illegal drugs, which has left thousands of mostly poor drug suspects dead.
Police blamed the deaths on clashes with law enforcers. Sereno’s expulsion has generated “a climate of intimidation” in the 15-member High Court and other levels of the judiciary, Garcia-Sayan said in an interview with The
Associated Press in Manila.
He added that there was no formal UN investigation into Sereno’s removal, but as the UN rapporteur who looks into threats to independence of judges and lawyers worldwide, he had to speak up when problems are reported anywhere in the world.
He cited his upcoming report on such a threat to the judiciary in Poland.
“For a rapporteur of the UN on independence of justice to keep silent when a chief justice in any country in the world, even in my country, would be dismissed in such way is impossible, and it will be immoral to stay silent,” Garcia-Sayan, a former justice and foreign minister of Peru, said.
He said he sent questions to the Philippine government about the circumstances leading to the May 11 removal of Sereno and expressed hopes that the Duterte administration would reply within 60 days and agree to a dialogue on issues that could threaten the judiciary’s independence.
Sereno, 57, was expelled by an 8-6 vote on a petition filed by government lawyer General Jose Calida, who accused her of failing to file asset disclosures as a state university law professor years ago, a charge she denies. It pre-empted impeachment proceedings against Sereno that were then underway in Congress. Sereno has appealed the ruling, citing a constitutional principle that top judiciary officials can only be removed by congressional impeachment.
A majority of the 23-member Senate, including some Mr Duterte allies, has asked the Supreme Court to review its decision, calling it a “dangerous precedent” that infringed on Congress’ power to impeach senior officials. Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said Garcia-Sayan was misinformed and added that while Mr Duterte has been critical of Sereno for claiming that he plotted against her, the president had no hand in her expulsion.
His dislike of Sereno “is not an attack to the judiciary or an affront to judicial independence,” Mr Roque said.