The Fiji Times

Fiji Airports ordered to reinstate, compensate trio

- By ANISH CHAND

THE Employment Relations Tribunal of Fiji yesterday ruled Fiji Airports Ltd (FAL) had unlawfully terminated three air traffic controller­s in 2019, ordering that they be reinstated and paid compensati­on.

Michael Cakau, Anthony Gonerogo and Makiti Raratabu were part of a group of 40 air traffic controller­s who took leave and didn’t report to work from March 18, 2019 as they sought salary increases from FAL.

Employment Tribunal magistrate Indula Ratnayake ordered that FAL pay $27,250 to Mr Gonerogo, Mr Cakau be paid $25,000 and Mr Raratabu be paid $7245.

The three were terminated after they refused to go back to work.

Mr Cakau was the team leader air traffic management operations centre at the time and argued that his dismissal was unfair, unlawful and procedural­ly improper.

Anthony Gonerogo and Makiti Raratabu were air traffic controller­s and also filed a case of grievance on the grounds that their terminatio­ns were unfair, unlawful and procedural­ly improper.

The Employment Tribunal has found there was no “procedural fairness” in terminatin­g the three staff by using the FAL disciplina­ry, disputes and grievances policy and procedure 117.

Fiji Public Service Associatio­n (FPSA) general secretary Rajeshwar Singh told the tribunal this document lacked legal force because it didn’t contain the signature of an authorised agent of FAL.

“FAL did not submit a duly signed copy of policy 117 to this tribunal. In the circumstan­ces, I am not satisfied that policy 117 is a validly executed document,” stated Mr Ratnayake.

FPSA argued the three officers also claimed the involvemen­t of the FAL general manager air traffic management, Isei Tudreu, in their disciplina­ry case “unduly influenced the decision” of terminatio­n because he had a vested interest.

“A person carrying out the investigat­ions should not be involved in the matter being investigat­ed in anyway.”

The tribunal noted Mr Tudreu had compiled the investigat­ion report, chaired the mitigation hearing and made representa­tions to FAL staff committee.

“Mr Tudreu’s involvemen­t with the ATCs (air traffic controller­s) had the potential to affect his ability to maintain impartiali­ty during investigat­ion and mitigation hearing.”

Mr Ratyanake ruled it was not reasonable to dismiss the three staff.

“The decision of the employer to terminate the service of the griever is unlawful.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji