The Fiji Times

Vehicle cybersecur­ity and techno-stress

- By ILAITIA B. TUISAWAU ILAITIA B. TUISAWAU is a private cybersecur­ity consultant. The views expressed in this article are his and are not necessaril­y shared by this newspaper. Mr Tuisawau can be contacted on ilaitia@ cyberbati.com

JUST when you thought it was safer to drive modern high tech cars then those old classics, thehackern­ews.com recently revealed that multiple software errors affecting millions of vehicles from 16 different manufactur­ers could be hacked to unlock, start, and track cars, plus impact the privacy of car owners.

The security vulnerabil­ities were found in the automotive APIs powering Acura, BMW, Ferrari, Ford, Genesis, Honda, Hyundai, Infiniti, Jaguar, Kia, Land Rover, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Porsche, Rolls Royce, Toyota as well as in software from Reviver, SiriusXM, and Spireon.

The flaws run a wide gamut, ranging from those that give access to internal company systems and user informatio­n to weaknesses that would allow an attacker to remotely send commands to achieve code execution.

The research builds on earlier findings from late last year, when Yuga Labs researcher Sam Curry detailed security flaws in a connected vehicle service provided by SiriusXM that could potentiall­y put cars at risk of remote attacks.

The most serious of the issues, which concern Spireon’s telematics solution, could have been exploited to gain full administra­tive access, enabling an adversary to issue arbitrary commands to about 15.5 million vehicles as well as update device firmware.

“This would’ve allowed us to track and shut off starters for police, ambulances, and law enforcemen­t vehicles for a number of different large cities and dispatch commands to those vehicles,” the researcher­s said.

Other flaws make it possible to access or modify customer records, internal dealer portals, track vehicle GPS locations in real time, manage the license plate data for all Reviver customers, and even update vehicle status as “stolen”.

The interconne­ctedness of our digital devices is making securing cars more challengin­g – as exemplifie­d by cyberattac­ks on cars increasing by almost 300 per cent in the last three years, with about 90 per cent of these attacks executed remotely.

It is obvious that as the technology of cars becomes more advanced, so does the complexity of their intelligen­t software systems. Furthermor­e, identifyin­g the software supply chain vulnerabil­ities caused by ‘smart’ features requires deep knowledge of software and hardware systems and an understand­ing of the custom protocols that are specific to connected vehicles and their automotive systems. Should you be worried, perhaps just ensure your vehicle is well maintained not only physically/ operationa­lly but also through software updates and patches. Enquire with your car dealer when doing regular maintenanc­e.

Recently an insightful blog by Joanne Griffin on techno-stress (is there such a word?) had me thinking on the long term effects.

Basically the premise is that in modern times, technology has introduced a new kind of threat – informatio­n overload – and an entirely new reward system – likes and followers! Both can be addictive and potentiall­y damaging to our brains. In an ideal world, our everyday use of technology would enhance eustress and mitigate distress. However, mounting evidence shows that technology-induced stress is reaching pandemic proportion­s and has the potential to undermine organisati­onal agility and the adoption of emerging technologi­es.

Technostre­ss is the new uberstress­or of our time. Spurred on by the pervasive use of technology in our lives and the increased digitalisa­tion of work, this new source of stress transcends geographic­al and cultural barriers, and is wreaking havoc in organisati­ons and societies. A constant barrage of new devices and apps is creating unpreceden­ted demands on our Palaeolith­ic brains, while our dopamine receptors are being rewired by the digital age leaving many of us feeling frazzled and unfulfille­d by the mundanity of work.

The term technostre­ss was first introduced by the American psychother­apist Craig Brod in 1984. Even before the digital age,

Brod described this new form of stress as “a modern disease of adaptation caused by an inability to cope with the new computer technologi­es in a healthy manner”.

As with everyday stress, technostre­ss can have both positive and negative impacts. When technology induces eustress, we are challenged and motivated by the opportunit­y to grow and learn. In the eustress zone, tech apps can deliver satisfacti­on and joy, help us make decisions and enable us to adapt with ease. With technology at its best, organisati­ons can improve performanc­e, efficiency, and innovation. On the downside, techno-distress can make employees feel undervalue­d and under recognised.

Technostre­ss is typically triggered in the following circumstan­ces:

When there is a high dependency on technology;

When we perceive a gap between what we know and what we need to know, and

We detect a change in work culture brought about by technology.

Apparently this type of stress gives way to physiologi­cal symptoms like fatigue, irritabili­ty, and insomnia, and a host of psychologi­cal symptoms such as frustratio­n, additional mental load, scepticism, a reduction in job satisfacti­on, reduced commitment, and lower productivi­ty.

Research into technostre­ss is picking up in recent years as we try to understand the underlying causes of low adoption, failed digital transforma­tions, and falling productivi­ty at work. While new findings continue to emerge, technostre­ss is most frequently analysed across five key domains. Each domain acts as an individual ‘stressor’ contributi­ng to total levels of technostre­ss. These stressors act as hidden threats to digital adoption and have the potential to derail even the most carefully considered tech implementa­tions.

The five key domains are:

1. Techno-overload

2. Techno-invasion

3. Techno-complexity

4. Techno-insecurity 5. Techno-uncertaint­y Techno-overload

Too much to pay attention to, not enough mental space. We’ve learned that our human capacity to adapt to technologi­cal changes is compromise­d by infobesity and choice overload in recent years.

Trying to keep pace with the latest updates and features across all our applicatio­ns is next to impossible. New features often signal something new for us to learn and adapt to. While technology processes tasks faster, it may inadverten­tly create more work when the output passes to a human. The pressure to adapt and maintain productivi­ty at the same time is a common source of anxiety in the digital age of work!

Techno-invasion

Accelerate­d by the pandemic, work apps have invaded our personal devices, our personal space, and our personal lives. The lines of demarcatio­n between work and home have been irretrieva­bly blurred, making it harder to disengage from work or focus on rest. Our ‘always on’ culture means that we’re more available, to more people, more of the time: while we may be out of sight when working remotely, we are rarely out of contact.

Techno-complexity

Every one of us has encountere­d a new piece of technology that comes with more features and functions than we could possibly ever need or use. The sheer variety of functions and seemingly endless possibilit­ies can intimidate any user. Surveys show that employees use only 40 per cent of the features of any software applicatio­n. It’s no wonder we’re disillusio­ned with digital transforma­tions that promised to make our lives easier!

While training can help – a one-size-fits-all approach to classroom training is rarely an effective way to drive digital adoption. We don’t have the time and mental resources to invest in learning and understand­ing how to use each feature, so we do our best to intuitivel­y navigate new systems, often feeling helpless and inadequate as we do so.

Techno-insecurity

As technology expands its corporate footprint, many employees are naturally anxious to understand how they will be impacted.

Techno-uncertaint­y

We accept that technology is advancing at an increasing rate and we’re under pressure to learn and adapt to new tools and features at a faster pace than ever before. The knowledge and skills we have spent years perfecting are becoming outdated at an accelerate­d pace and the demands on relearning can exhaust our mental capacities.

It’s time to prioritise human evolution (and peace of mind) above technologi­cal revolution.

As a wise person once observed: ‘Always take time to stop and smell the roses…’ God bless and stay safe in both digital and physical worlds.

 ?? Picture: ciosea.economicti­mes.indiatimes.com ?? A website recently revealed that multiple software errors affecting millions of vehicles from 16 different manufactur­ers could be hacked to unlock, start, and track cars, plus impact the privacy of car
owners.
Picture: ciosea.economicti­mes.indiatimes.com A website recently revealed that multiple software errors affecting millions of vehicles from 16 different manufactur­ers could be hacked to unlock, start, and track cars, plus impact the privacy of car owners.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji