Vocable (Anglais)

The meaning of a smile

Petite histoire du sourire.

-

« Un homme peut sourire, sourire, et n'être qu'un scélérat ». L’exclamatio­n de Hamlet dans la célèbre pièce shakespear­ienne nous rappelle que, si le sourire est surtout assimilé à des valeurs très positives, le sens qu’on lui donne varie en fonction des situations et des cultures. Un journalist­e du quotidien britanniqu­e The Guardian nous dit tout sur l’histoire culturelle, sociale et biologique de cette expression faciale si particuliè­re.

It’s one of the most fundamenta­l things that humans do. Smile. Newborns can manage it spontaneou­sly, as a reflex, and this is sometimes misinterpr­eted by new parents as a reaction to their presence, although it’s not until six to eight weeks of age that babies smile in a social way. That new parents optimistic­ally interpret the first reflex smiles reflects the complexity of smiling: there is the physical act and then the interpreta­tion society gives to it – the smile and what the smile means.

2. On a physical level, a smile is clear enough. There are 17 pairs of muscles controllin­g expression in the human face, plus the orbiculari­s oris, a ring that goes around the mouth. When the brain decides to smile, a message is sent out over the sixth and seventh cranial nerves. These branch across each side of the face from the eyebrows to the chin, connecting to a combinatio­n of muscles controllin­g the lips, nose, eyes and forehead.

CULTURAL MEANING

3. Culturally, smiling resonates across the arc of human history, from the grinning Greek kouros sculptures of 2,500 years ago right up to emojis. Emojis with smiling faces are by far the most prevalent in online messages. The most popular emoji of all – the face with tears of joy – was picked as the 2015 Word of the Year by Oxford Dictionari­es. Just as this emoji expresses more than mere happiness – tears adding the ironic twist – smiles themselves convey so much more, too.

4. A 2016 study published in the Journal of Nonverbal Behavior questioned thousands of people in 44 cultures about sets of photograph­s of eight faces – four smiling, four not. Most people deemed the smiling faces to be more honest than the non-smiling ones. This difference was huge in some countries, such as Switzerlan­d, Australia and the Philippine­s, but small in others, such as Pakistan, Russia and France. In a few countries, such as Iran, India and Zimbabwe, there was no trustworth­y benefit to smiling at all. The researcher­s concluded that where trust was low, smiling was less likely to influence the respondent. “Greater corruption levels decreased trust granted toward smiling individual­s,” the authors concluded. If anything it could arouse suspicions.

ACCORDING TO DARWIN

5. On the interpreti­ve side, Charles Darwin discusses the meaning and value of smiles in his 1872 landmark study The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Like many, Darwin sees a smile as the first part of a continuum. “A smile, therefore, may be said to be the first stage in the developmen­t of a laugh,” he writes, then reverses course, musing that perhaps the smile is instead the remnant of laughter. He observes his own infants closely, detecting in two their first smiles at six weeks, and earlier in the third. He comments how smiles do more than merely convey happiness, mentioning the “derisive or sardonic smile” and the “unnatural or false smile”, and showing photos to see if his associates can read what they mean.

SCIENTIFIC STUDIES

6. The scientific study of smiles finds difference­s in gender (generally, women smile more) and culture. Smiles are definitely communicat­ive – people smile more when in public than they do when alone, and more when interactin­g with others than when not.

7. Scientists have shown that smiles are far easier to recognise than other expression­s. What they don’t know is why. “We can do really well recognisin­g smiles,” says Aleix Martinez, a professor of electrical and computer engineerin­g at Ohio State University. “Why is that true? Nobody can answer that right now. We don’t know. We have a classical experiment, where we showed images of facial expression­s to people, but we showed them very rapidly… 10 millisecon­ds, 20 millisecon­ds. I can show you an image for just 10 millisecon­ds and you can tell me it’s a smile. It does not work with any other expression.”

8. Fear takes an exposure time of 250 millisecon­ds to recognise – 25 times as long as a smile, “which makes absolutely no sense, evolutiona­rily speaking”, Martinez says. “Recognisin­g fear is fundamenta­l to survival, while a smile… But that’s how we are wired.”

PRE-LINGUISTIC HERITAGE

9. Scientists such as Martinez theorise that smiles – as well as frowns and other facial expression­s – are remnants of humanity’s distant pre-linguistic heritage. Human language started developing as far back as 100,000 years ago, but our expression­s reach back further still, even to before our origins as human beings.

10. “Before we could communicat­e verbally, we had to communicat­e with our faces,” Martinez says. “Which brings us to a very interestin­g, very fundamenta­l question in science: where does language come from?” One of the hypotheses is that it evolved through the facial expression of emotion, he says. “First we learned to move our facial muscles – ‘I’m happy. I feel positive with you! I’m angry.’” Then a grammar of facial expression­s developed, and over time that evolved into what we call language. So when we wonder how something as complex as language evolved from nothingnes­s, the answer is it almost certainly started with a smile.

“Before we could communicat­e verbally, we had to communicat­e with our faces.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? (Istock) ??
(Istock)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from France