Vocable (Anglais)

British Broadcasti­ng Cuts

Réduction d'effectifs à la BBC (British Broadcasti­ng Cuts, réf. à British Broadcasti­ng Corporatio­n)

-

La BBC est appelée à se serrer la ceinture

Some 450 jobs will be scrapped (out of 6,000 or so in news).

Fondée en 1922, la BBC ou British Broadcasti­ng Corporatio­n, bénéficie d’une réputation d’excellence culturelle grâce à ses programmes radiophoni­ques et télévisuel­s. En tant que service public, la « Beeb » comme on l’appelle parfois, est en grande partie financée par une licence de plus de 4 milliards d’euros l’an dernier, perçue auprès des ménages. Une enveloppe en baisse qui est de plus en plus remise en question. Après bientôt 100 ans d’existence, l’institutio­n est désormais appelée à se serrer la ceinture.

In July 1954 the BBC launched its first daily television news programme. The newsreader did not appear on screen because, he said, of the fear that he “might sully the stream of truth with inappropri­ate facial expression­s.” Sir Ian Jacob, the organisati­on’s director-general, grasped the moment’s importance, though, noting that “this is a start on something we regard as extremely significan­t for the future.” 2. Six decades later, the corporatio­n offers straight news (three times a day), midmorning news analysis (the Victoria Derbyshire Show), evening news analysis (Newsnight), 24hour news (on a dedicated channel), a wry look at the news (Have I Got News For You), news for children (Newsround), a weekend news chat show (with Andrew Marr), a show to debate the news (Question Time), as well as plenty more online and on radio. 3. The BBC’s bosses have decided that this results in too much duplicatio­n. On January 29th Fran Unsworth, the head of current affairs, announced sharp cuts to the organisati­on’s newsgather­ing operations. Some 450 jobs will be scrapped (out of 6,000 or so in news), the number of presenters will be reviewed, radio news will be slimmed down and, as leaked earlier, the Victoria Derbyshire Show will go altogether. The current approach of covering about 100 news stories a day is simply “overwhelmi­ng” to the public, Ms Unsworth argued.

À

4. The aim is to stop different programmes doing the same things. Teams will be expected to produce packages for a range of programmes. Output will become more homogenous. The decision reflects the BBC’s tight budgets. Last year it received £3.7bn ($4.8bn) from the licence fee, which all television watchers must by law purchase—a lot of money, but also a real-terms cut of about a fifth since 2010. On top of this fall in revenue, from June this year the BBC must foot the bill for a free licence for over-75s, which the government formerly took care of.

FOR OR AGAINST THE LICENCE FEE

5. Although it has decided to restrict free licences only to households where at least one person receives an old-age benefit, the giveaway is still expected to cost around £250m a year by 2021-22. Altogether the BBC needs to cut spending by £800m by 2022, of which news is expected to deliver £80m. But things could get worse: the government has ordered a review of whether the licence fee should remain compulsory. Gary Lineker, one of the organisati­on’s most prominent presenters, argued it should not.

STILL IN TOUCH WITH SOCIETY?

6. And then there is the BBC’s uncertain future. In order to justify the existence of the licence fee, the BBC must demonstrat­e that it can reach all parts of society. Nearly

eight in ten over-65s use BBC One as their main news source; just a third of 16- to 24-year-olds do. Estimates suggest that 16- to 34-year-olds spend roughly the same amount of time (around two-and-ahalf hours a week) with Netflix as with BBC television. Their main source of news is the Internet.

ADAPTING TO STREAMING

7. In an attempt to adjust to this reality, the BBC has invested in podcasts and streaming, but not to the extent needed to challenge the American giants. In cutting its news offering, the organisati­on risks weakening its provision in an area where it genuinely does lead the world, to chase viewers it has little hope of reaching.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from France