Deutsche Welle (English edition)
US Capitol riot: Critics see police double standards at play
Police treated the rioters at the US Capitol very differently from Black Lives Matter protesters last summer. Many critics believe they were more lenient on Wednesday because the crowd was mostly white.
The rioters in Washington, DC, did not succeed in their endeavor to overthrow the election results. In the early morning hours on Thursday, US House representatives and senators certified Joe Biden's victory and formally made way for him and Kamala Harris to become the next president and vice president of the United States. But it's what came before that will go down as one of the darkest days in US history.
Encouraged by President Donald Trump, a violent, overwhelmingly white crowd overpowered Capitol police and forced its way into the building. They waved flags, posed for pictures on the Senate floor and stole items from leaders like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
When the storm on the Capitol was over, four people were dead – one woman had been shot and three people died in "medical emergencies," DC Metropolitan Police Department Chief Robert Contee said at a press conference. As of 9:30 p.m. on Wednesday, there had been roughly 52 arrests, according to DC police. Most of those people were detained because they were violating the 6 p.m. curfew instituted by Washington's mayor Muriel Bowser.
Black vs. white protesters
In the hours following Wednesday's events, many people began contrasting law enforcement's behavior during the riot with how officers had
treated Black Lives Matter protesters last summer. Thousands of demonstrators from across the US had taken to the streets after African American George Floyd was killed by a white police officer in Minneapolis in May 2020. In Washington, DC, the protests had centered on what became Black Lives Matter Plaza, a stone's throw from the White House.
The situation had escalated on June 1, 2020, when militarized law enforcement officers in riot gear had used tear-gaslike chemical agents and brute force to push back peaceful protesters so that Trump could walk to a nearby church for a photo op.
"When Black people protest for our lives, we are met by National Guard troops or police equipped with assault rifles, tear gas and battle helmets," the official account of the Black Lives Matter movement tweeted on Wednesday. "When white people attempt a coup, they are met by an underwhelming number of law enforcement personnel who act powerless to intervene."
Steven Sund, the head of the US Capitol police (USCP), the law enforcement agency responsible for the Capitol and its surroundings, resigned on
Thursday in reaction to Wednesday's events. Before his resignation, he released a statement saying that Capitol police and other law enforcement officers "responded valiantly" when faced with the rioters.
"The USCP had a robust plan established to address anticipated First Amendment activities. But make no mistake – these mass riots were not First Amendment activities; they were criminal riotous behavior," Sund stated.
"The actions of the USCP officers were heroic given the situation they faced, and I continue to have tremendous respect in the professionalism and dedication of the women and men of the United States Capitol Police." Paul Irving, the House Sergeant at Arms, as well as the Senate Sergeant at Arms, Michael Stenger, have also resigned.
'A difference in the level of force'
Melvin Edwards, an AfricanAmerican author and cultural observer based in Maryland, said he wasn't surprised by how the events on Wednesday unfolded.
"There certainly seems to be a difference in the level of force and how quickly force is enacted on different groups," said Edwards, the author of "The Eyes of Texans: From Slavery to the Texas Capitol."
He went on to tell DW that part of this was due to "predetermined reactions by police that certain people are more violent than others. I think it's generally considered, even today unfortunately, that Black males are more dangerous than white males."
Edwards also pointed out, however, that he didn't blame the officers working at the Capitol on Wednesday for the way the situation escalated. Instead, he said he couldn't fathom why the people in charge of security that day didn't plan for more officers to protect the Capitol.
"Why didn't they take this more seriously?" Edwards asked. "They had plenty of notice. The president had been tweeting for weeks, encouraging people to come to Washington yesterday. And people on social media were actively excited about the idea of bringing their guns to the nation's capital and physically fighting for Trump. It wasn't a surprise to anybody who paid attention."
' If Black people had stormed the Capitol'
The fact that police hadn't arrested a significant number of the rioters who violently and illegally broke into a federal building, forcing politicians to seek shelter in their offices or under desks, caused anger and disbelief among many.
On Thursday, US Vice President-elect Kamala Harris said on Twitter that Americans have now witnessed two systems of justice: "One that let extremists storm the US Capitol yesterday, and another that released tear gas on peaceful protestors last summer. It’s simply unacceptable."
And Chasten Buttigieg, the husband of Biden's nominee for Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, tweeted that "White privilege is violently storming the US Capitol and just … being sent home."
Several athletes and coaches in the National Basketball Association (NBA), a league whose members have previously been vocal about racial injustices, spoke out about Wednesday's events as well.
"Can you imagine today if those were all Black people storming the Capitol and what would have happened?" Philadelphia 76ers head coach Doc Rivers said to reporters before a game.
He pointed out that during the riot there had been "no police dogs turned on people, no billy clubs hitting people. People peacefully being escorted out of the Capitol. So it shows you can disperse a crowd peacefully, but it's a sad day in a lot of ways."