Deutsche Welle (English edition)

Could Afghanista­n under Taliban rule become a haven for Islamist militants?

Although US military withdrawal raises the risk of terrorist activity, experts say the Taliban will likely value pursuing internatio­nal recognitio­n of their rule over harboring militants.

-

As the US withdraws its military from Afghanista­n, it is clear that Washington's goal in the country has always been to guarantee American security. President Joe Biden left little doubt to this effect during a speech last week.

"Our single most vital interest in Afghanista­n remains what it always was, to prevent a terrorist attack on our country."

Biden's assertion that this interest can be preserved without US military presence is not shared by all US politician­s.

Republican member of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee Michael McCaul said last week that Afghanista­n was returning to the "terrorist safe haven" it was before the US invasion in 2001.

US Army General Mark Milley has also said he is concerned that militant groups like alQaeda and the "Islamic State (IS)" could quickly rebuild their networks in Afghanista­n.

Will the Taliban change?

While there is a real risk that these groups can now reorganize in Afghanista­n, terrorism expert Daniel Byman wrote recently in Foreign Affairs that Afghanista­n is unlikely to again become a base for internatio­nal Islamist militants, even if the US troop withdrawal makes counterter­rorism operations more difficult.

Byman asserts that the Taliban have learned from the past and will behave differentl­y. He added that al-Qaeda has lost a large part of its former strength, and that the Taliban and "Islamic State" are enemies.

South Asian expert Christian Wagner from the German Institute for Internatio­nal and Security Affairs (SWP) in Berlin also considers it unlikely for Islamist militants to reestablis­h their former strength and presence in a Taliban-ruled Afghanista­n.

"They no longer want to be a pariah state and are trying to work towards internatio­nal recognitio­n," Wagner told DW.

When the Taliban ruled Afghanista­n from 1996 to 2001, Wagner points out that the socalled Islamic Emirate Of Afghanista­n was only recognized by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

"The Taliban now want to change that," Wagner said. The Taliban also know greater internatio­nal recognitio­n is only possible if they can adapt their politics, and this especially includes how they deal with internatio­nal Islamist militant groups, he added.

The world is watching the Taliban

Western countries are not the only ones worried about the Taliban using Afghanista­n to harbor internatio­nal terrorist militias.

To keep tabs on their intentions, Russia has maintained channels of communicat­ion with the Taliban for years. China has also increasing­ly been speaking with Taliban representa­tives over the past few months. And Iran has also opened dialogue with the Taliban, offering to assist with possible peace talks in the future.

All three of these Afghan neighbors are united in fighting Islamist terrorism, and the Taliban are likely aware of this.

And even after its withdrawal from Afghanista­n, the US isn't trusting the Taliban to keep out new terrorist threats.

According to analyst Byman, the US still has well-engineered reconnaiss­ance options available to observe and combat the emergence of Islamist terrorism in Afghanista­n should it become necessary.

"The US military has explored ways of using its air bases outside Afghanista­n for strikes against al-Qaeda camps, or other methods of operating in the country should it become necessary," Byman writes in Foreign A airs.

The Taliban, 'IS' and alQaeda

Neverthele­ss, ties between the Taliban and al-Qaeda remain close, according to Edmund Fitton-Brown, head of the UN mission to monitor "IS," alQaeda and the Taliban.

"We assume that the leadership of al-Qaeda will continue to be under the protection of the Taliban," Fitton-Brown told US broadcaste­r NBC in October.

"IS" in Afghanista­n, however, has encountere­d resistance from the Taliban. According to a report published by the UN Security Council in May 2020, "IS" has suffered significan­t setbacks in Afghanista­n, with the Taliban playing a major role.

Militant groups like "IS" and al-Qaeda also have different goals than the Taliban, which is almost entirely focused on expanding its rule in Afghanista­n.

The other two groups, however, operate on an internatio­nal level, and borders do not matter to them.

Analyst Wagner said that these diverging goals affect relations between IS and the Taliban.

According to Wagner, 'IS' accuses the Afghans of concentrat­ing only on their own country and thus valuing it higher than Islam and the goal of spreading Islam.

Al-Qaeda also pursues the goal of spreading Islam, but does so in a different way than "IS," and this does not lead to tension with them Taliban, Wagner said.

"Both groups [Taliban and alQaeda] are linked to one another through their common combat experience in Afghanista­n, and in some cases, they can hardly be separated from one another," said Wagner.

As the Taliban comes to power in Afghanista­n, this could make it difficult for them to define their relationsh­ip with alQaeda.

Wagner said the dynamic of how relations between the two groups are carried out will likely take place on a local, rather than national, level, and depend heavily on interperso­nal relationsh­ips.

 ??  ?? Before 2001, the Taliban harbored terrorist groups like al-Qaeda
Before 2001, the Taliban harbored terrorist groups like al-Qaeda

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Germany