Deutsche Welle (English edition)

Will post-Afghanista­n US foreign policy shift focus to Southeast Asia?

Following the US exit from Afghanista­n, government­s in Southeast Asia are watching if their region will now have priority as Washington refocuses its foreign policy goals.

-

The calamity of the US withdrawal from Afghanista­n over the past two weeks has drawn scathing rebukes of US foreign policy, while raising serious questions over how the US intends to project power in the future.

In Southeast Asia, the US has been working to shore up regional alliances vis a vis China. Last week, US Vice President Kamala Harris concluded a weeklong trip to Singapore and Vietnam, where she reaffirmed Washington's commitment to Southeast Asia.

However, Harris' Southeast Asia trip came amid the greatest foreign policy debacle for the US in decades.

Several Southeast Asian government­s were forced to hurriedly evacuate their citizens from Afghanista­n as the result of Washington’s decisions, and there are concerns that a surge of Islamic extremism in Afghanista­n could increase the threat of terrorist attacks in Southeast Asia.

Monitoring US commitment

During a joint briefing with Harris on August 23, Singapore's prime minister, Lee Hsein Loong, said that "what will influence perception­s of US resolve and commitment to the region will be what the US does going forward."

In the decades after the end of the Vietnam War, US interest in Southeast Asia was typified in foreign policy circles as a form of "benign neglect."

However, with the rise of the region's economies, as well as the threat of a more assertive China, Southeast Asia became a key region for Washington, marked by the so-called pivot to Asia policy from the Obama administra­tion in 2011.

"Southeast Asia always has a degree of angst about US staying in power in the region, but I don't think that Afghanista­n moves the needle of their concerns very much," said Bonnie Glaser, director of the Asia Program at the German Marshall

Fund of the United States.

The United States is a key economic and security partner of most Southeast Asian government­s and has a treaty alliance with Thailand and the Philippine­s, as well as close defense ties to Singapore and Vietnam, one of its major partners in Asia today.

Washington has taken the side of Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia in their disputes with China over territory in the South China Sea.

But over the past several weeks, the hasty withdrawal from Afghanista­n has forced some government­s to question whether Washington will come to their defense if a violent conflict broke out with China.

Southeast Asia is not Afghanista­n

For the most part, however, Southeast Asian government­s are aware that US interests in their region are vastly different from what the US has tried to achieve elsewhere.

While US interventi­on in countries like Afghanista­n revolved around anti-terrorism efforts and nation-building, in Southeast Asia, Washington's interests focus on improving already close relations with stable states.

Moreover, the US in Afghanista­n tasked itself with providing much of the country's security, as well as bankrollin­g a weak and impoverish­ed state.

Southeast Asia is home to some of the world's fastestgro­wing economies, from which American businesses can profit. The Southeast Asian bloc is America's fourth-largest trading partner, according to US government data.

Will Southeast Asia now get more US attention?

Some analysts in Southeast Asia are now watching whether the US withdrawal from Afghanista­n will actually allow the US to engage more deeply in other key regions.

"The Biden administra­tion came to office stating that it intended to recalibrat­e from Central Asia and the Middle East to the Indo-Pacific," said Chong Ja Ian, an associate professor of political science at the National University of Singapore. "Withdrawin­g from Afghanista­n was part of this plan, except that it was very poorly executed," he told DW.

What matters most for Southeast Asian government­s will be how quickly the United States moves to reinforce the message that the Indo-Pacific lies at the heart of American foreign policy, said Chong.

"Should the retreat from Afghanista­n mean a more effective and robust recalibrat­ed US presence in Southeast Asia, the United States may be able to maintain a presence and expand on its options, and limit any [Chinese influence] over its actions, in the region," he added.

Many Southeast Asian government­s expressed confusion during the last years of the Trump administra­tion, especially after he seemingly snubbed the region by not sending a senior official to the ASEAN summit in 2019.

And in the first months of the Biden administra­tion, there were complaints that the US had lost interest in the region, the likely reason for vice-president Harris' visit in late August.

The trip was intended to "build on the Biden-Harris Administra­tion's message to the world: America is back," Harris' office said in a statement before her visit to Vietnam and Singapore.

"Our partnershi­ps in Singapore, in Southeast Asia, and throughout the Indo-Pacific are a top priority for the United States," Harris said while in the city-state.

As well as Harris' trip, US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin visited Singapore, the Philippine­s and Vietnam in late July. In May, US Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman visited Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has also recently participat­ed in ministeria­l meetings of the ASEAN bloc.

"The US withdrawal from Afghanista­n certainly attests to the regional uncertaint­y of the US commitment," said Yun Sun, co-director of the East Asia program at the Stimson Center in Washington. "But the region is generally convinced that the US will not be able to leave Southeast Asia," she told DW.

US building alliances against China

Then there is the fact that Southeast Asia is a key area in Washington’s rivalry with China.

"From the US perspectiv­e, it is unrealisti­c to leave Southeast Asia, with its geographic­al, economic, historical and social connection­s, which are now compounded by the competitio­n with China," said Sun. "In that framework, Southeast Asia is the frontline of the competitio­n," she added.

This can be taken two ways by Southeast Asian leaders. Because Southeast Asia is an integral region in Washington's rivalry with Beijing, especially over issues like territoria­l disputes in the South China Sea and resource conflict on the Mekong River, regional government­s can expect to maintain the attention of officials in Washington.

"Southeast Asia wants the US and China to compete for their attention, but countries in the region resent being forced to choose [between the two]," explained Sun.

However, because some regional government­s "worry the US only cares about them because of China," American "staying power" could also diminish if Washington alters its current opinion of China as a major rival, the analyst added.

 ??  ?? Southeast Asian nations often find themselves stuck choosing between China and the US
Southeast Asian nations often find themselves stuck choosing between China and the US
 ??  ?? Kamala Harris met with government, private sector, and civil society leaders in Southeast Asia
Kamala Harris met with government, private sector, and civil society leaders in Southeast Asia

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Germany