Stabroek News Sunday

PPP/C MPs challenge DPP over discontinu­ation of charges against ministers

-

PPP/C Members of Parliament (MPs) Juan Edghill and Vickram Bharrat on Friday filed applicatio­ns in the High Court challengin­g the decision of Director of Public Prosecutio­ns (DPP) Shalimar Ali-Hack to discontinu­e the private criminal charges filed against two sitting ministers.

This move comes weeks after Transparen­cy Institute of Guyana Inc. (TIGI) urged that the matter be taken before the court.

“We…believe that the decision of the DPP can and should be challenged in court. Such a challenge will clarify the appropriat­e procedure and serve as a guide for future actions,” the transparen­cy body had said while pointing out that it had been unable to verify the claims that the allegation­s ought first to have been reported to the Guyana Police Force for an investigat­ion to be launched and the advice of the DPP sought before the charges were filed.

Attorney and PPP/C MP Anil Nandlall filed the applicatio­ns on behalf of Edghill and Bharrat, while the DPP is listed as the respondent.

Both applicants are asking the court for a Writ of Certiorari quashing the decision made by the DPP on April 23rd, 2018, to discontinu­e private criminal charges of Misconduct in Public Office, filed against Minister of Public Health Volda Lawrence and Minister of Social Cohesion Dr. George Norton on the grounds that the decision is capricious, whimsical, irrational, based upon irrelevant and extraneous considerat­ions, contrary to the rules of natural justice, unreasonab­le, unlawful, null, void and of no effect.

They are also asking the court to grant any other order that it deems fit and just in the circumstan­ces.

The charges against Lawrence and Norton were the first of two sets of private charges that were filed. They were filed in the Georgetown Magistrate’s Court on April 19th, 2018.

Identical grounds were listed in both appeals.

Firstly, they contend that in the exercise of the powers vested in the Office of Director of Public Prosecutio­ns by virtue of Article 187 (c) of the Constituti­on of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana, Ali-Hack is bound to act in accordance with the relevant principles of public law and cannot act capricious­ly, whimsicall­y, irrational­ly, based upon irrelevant and extraneous considerat­ions, contrary to the rules of natural justice, unreasonab­ly and unlawfully.

Secondly, they say that her decision is capricious, whimsical, irrational, based upon irrelevant and extraneous considerat­ions, contrary to the rules of natural justice, unreasonab­le, unlawful, null, void and of no effect.

The charge brought by Edghill against Lawrence related to a controvers­ial $605.9 million drug purchase last year for the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporatio­n from Ansa McAl Trading Limited. It is being alleged that she willfully misconduct­ed herself in a way which amounted to an abuse of public trust without reasonable excuse or justificat­ion when she authorised or caused the unapproved single sourcing and purchase of the drugs and medical supplies.

The charge against Dr. Norton, which was brought by Bharrat, related to the contentiou­s rental of a Sussex Street building for use as a medical bond. It is alleged that Norton in June, 2016, willfully misconduct­ed himself in a way which amounted to an abuse of public trust without reasonable excuse or justificat­ion when he authorised or caused the rental of the property from Linden Holdings Incorporat­ed, for the sum of $12.5 million, which has been described as “an excessive rate of rental.”

Edghill and Bharrat, in their appeals, noted that after the charges were filed, the Chief Magistrate issued a summons for Lawrence and Norton to appear before the court on April 24th. However, one day before the court date, they learnt via the press of the discontinu­ation of the charges.

They noted that a press statement issued by the Office of the DPP stated that the charges “concern a grave issue under the criminal law in relation to two serving Ministers. In the interest of good governance in the State of Guyana such allegation­s ought first to have been reported to the Guyana Police Force for an investigat­ion to be launched and the advice of the DPP sought.”

While both appellants acknowledg­e that the DPP has the authority to discontinu­e at

any stage before judgment is delivered any such criminal proceeding­s instituted or undertaken by any person or authority, they contend that her decision was unjust and unlawful. They say the DPP has no functional responsibi­lity whatsoever touching or concerning “the interest of good governance in the State of Guyana.” They further said they have been advised that there that there is “no legal requiremen­t for an allegation of criminal misconduct to be reported to the Guyana Police Force for an investigat­ion as a preconditi­on to the institutio­n of any private criminal charge” and that the right to institute a private criminal charge with or without a report first being made to the Police is a “common law right of the citizenry hallowed by time.”

Sunday Stabroek understand­s that the DPP’s decision to discontinu­e the second set of charges brought against Finance Minister Winston Jordan, Public Infrastruc­ture Minister David Patterson and Public Service Minister Dr Rupert Roopnarain­e will also be challenged. Those charges related to the funds spent on the billion-dollar D’Urban Park project.

After the discontinu­ation of the charges, the PPP, in a statement, had questioned the DPP’s motive, saying that she had not taken a similar position in similar cases.

“The discontinu­ance by the [DPP] of the private criminal charges filed… and her failure to do likewise, in relation to similar charges… is a clear demonstrat­ion that the DPP has buckled under pressure exerted by a government that has caused criminal investigat­ions to commence against her, in relation to a plot of land allocated to her, under the [PPP/C] Administra­tion,” the party had said, while describing the reasons given as “comical at best”.

The applicatio­ns have been fixed for hearing on the 10th of July, 2018, at 9.30 am before Justice Fidela Corbin-Lincoln.

 ??  ?? Shalimar Ali-Hack
Shalimar Ali-Hack
 ??  ?? Juan Edghill
Juan Edghill
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana