Stabroek News Sunday

GECOM cannot escape the accusation of fraud and must investigat­e

-

Dear Editor,

Since Mingo’s fiasco at Ashmins building, there have been loud and persistent cries of electoral fraud. The PPP/C and the Rest-of-the-World (ROW) are contending that the electoral process was free, fair, and transparen­t, but Mingo’s declaratio­n was fraudulent. This large grouping (which includes all the contesting parties, local and internatio­nal observers) has provided videos and other evidence that shows how Mingo added votes for APNU+AFC and reduced the votes cast in favour of the PPP/C.

Notwithsta­nding the overwhelmi­ng evidence provided by the PPP/C and the ROW, APNU+AFC refuses to accept the same. Instead, APNU+AFC is complainin­g of irregulari­ties on polling day, which included voting by the dead persons and overseas voters. While APNU+AFC is yet to provide evidence to support its claim, a small group of APNU+AFC’s supporters has embraced the narrative of voters’ irregulari­ties as ‘Divine Wisdom’ from the Supreme Being. Given this reality, APNU+AFC is milking every opportunit­y to raise as many unsubstant­iated objections as possible during the recount exercise. The APNU+AFC knows that if it

continues, some of its supporters will refuse to accept the results from the recount and join in the call for fresh elections by the party.

Regardless of which narrative we believe, GECOM cannot escape the accusation of fraud. It will have to shoulder the blame for either facilitati­ng ineligible persons to vote for a political party on March 2, 2020, or allowing Mingo to declare fraudulent results. Both narratives, therefore, must be investigat­ed to ensure that the final results for the 2020 elections are credible and prevent future electoral fraud. Fortunatel­y, the recount exercise will aid in any investigat­ion to determine whether Mingo’s declaratio­n was correct. All that GECOM is required to do is compare the Statements of Poll (SOPs) and Statements of Recount (SOR) with Mingo’s declaratio­n. I am sure that if they do this, it will confirm that Mingo’s declaratio­n cannot be used to determine the winner of the elections but the official documents they have: the SOPs and SORs. More importantl­y, by utilizing the SOPs and SORs, they will ensure that the real winner is awarded the electoral victory.

Once the winner of the elections is appropriat­ely determined, GECOM should launch a forensic audit to investigat­e the claims by the APNU+AFC. Even though I am sure such an investigat­ion will not unearth anything, it will assuage the fear harboured by APNU+AFC’s supporters that they were robbed of the elections. This investigat­ion should not prevent the declaratio­n of the winner but should be undertaken after the winning party’s swearing-in.

The GECOM is duty-bound to conduct appropriat­e investigat­ions to address both narratives. These investigat­ions will inspire confidence regarding the final declaratio­n of the winner of the 2020 elections and foster trust in this constituti­onal agency’s ability to conduct credible elections in the future. Anything less by GECOM will implicate the entire commission and staff in electoral fraud. It is time for GECOM to clear its name.

Yours faithfully, S. Pasha

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana