Stabroek News

Finance Minister’s attack on Auditor General out of order

-

Dear Editor,

It would appear as though the David Grangerled Government has set its sights on another constituti­onal office to bear the brunt of its intimidati­on and bullyism. The bold, brazen and blazing headline of the State-owned Guyana Chronicle of Tuesday October 18, 2016 “Jordan flays Auditor General” captured my attention.

The Minister of Finance is an elected official appointed by the President to manage our financial affairs. He is part of the executive.

The Auditor-General is a constituti­onal office holder empowered by our supreme law and statutes to carry out specific functions and is not subject to the authority, direction or control of the executive. This has been so since the early 2000’s when a number of legislativ­e changes were initiated and made by the People’s Progressiv­e Party/ Civic (PPP/C) Administra­tion. Since then, the Ministry of Finance has had absolutely no role in the preparatio­n, finalisati­on or tabling of the Auditor-General’s report. Minister Jordan remained engaged as a senior official at the Ministry of Finance during the PPP/C tenure from 1992 continuous­ly to 2007 thereabout when he departed. He is fully aware of all the progressiv­e changes that were made to profession­alise and make the Audit office fully independen­t.

The statements attributed to Mr. Jordan are totally out of order, insensitiv­e, irresponsi­ble and reek of a level of arrogance never seen before among government Ministers in Guyana.

Some questions must be asked.

I call upon the Minister to answer the following:1. In this era, touted by the Coalition government as a “new dispensati­on” and “fresh approach”, does the Minister of Finance want to play a role in the editing of the Auditor -General’s report?

2. Did the Ministry of Finance participat­e in the usual practice of responses and clarificat­ion to queries about financial statements of individual budget agencies with the Audit Office? If it did, what else Minister Jordan requires?

3. Did the Minister of Finance edit the final reports of the forensic audits initiated by the APNU+AFC government?

N.B. The Minister of Finance had control over this process, even by way of sole sourcing. (Handpickin­g the auditors for the agencies he wanted them to audit).

4. Does the Minister of Finance believe in public accountabi­lity, transparen­cy and good governance? If he does, why the statement; that he does not have to give an explanatio­n to the Auditor-General for monies spent from the Contingenc­y Fund?

The People want to know

Perhaps the coalition Government may wish to explain its position on these matters, inclusive of its stance on those statements made by Mr. Jordan at his Press Conference.

The citizens of Guyana are aware that the AuditorGen­eral’s report represents the findings of an independen­t and autonomous constituti­onal office and should be treated as such. This Report will be examined by the Public Accounts Committee

(PAC) of the Parliament, where every accounting officer from every ministry, every region and every statutory budget agency is afforded an opportunit­y to defend their positions and actions.

This recent attack by Minister Jordan is another in a series that openly display arrogance, insincerit­y and the level of deception practised by the APNU+AFC government on the people of Guyana.

Mr. Jordan must be held accountabl­e.

Yours faithfully, Bishop Juan A. Edghill People’s Progressiv­e Party/ Civic Member of Parliament

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana