Stabroek News

Audit says Go-Invest’s failure to monitor made ‘large scale abuse’ of concession­s likely

-finds country didn’t benefit from exemptions to Baishanlin, Vaitarna

-

Guyana did not benefit from over $2B in concession­s that were granted to four investors, Baishanlin Internatio­nal Forest Developmen­t Inc, Vaitarna Holdings Private Inc, Diamond Tropical Wood Products Inc and Zhonghao Shipyards Inc, according to a forensic audit of the Guyana Office for Investment (Go-Invest), which has said that the failure to monitor such grants has made large scale abuse by investors likely.

“Go-Invest is a conduit for corporatio­ns and other businesses to obtain tax concession­s. However, there is also evidence that despite the fact that concession­s were granted to many investors, little or no business activity related to the Investment Agreement took place. In some instances, Go-Invest was used by businessme­n as an opportunit­y to obtain products without paying import duty and other taxes, then reselling the Goods or keeping them for personal use,” the report of the audit, which was conducted by Nigel Hinds Financial Services, states.

The audit, which was commission­ed by the government, has also concluded that GoInvest “has failed to fulfill its mandate” over the course of its two decades of existence and is “plagued” by poor governance, mismanagem­ent, no strategic plan, an absence of standard operating procedures and a lack of policy for investment agreements.

On the latter, the audit report states that senior management indicated that investment agreement proposals normally handed by Go-Invest were sometimes managed directly by the Office of the President under the former PPP/C administra­tions, including the recommenda­tions of concession­s.

It also notes that approval and denial of comparable investment­s highlighte­d that recommenda­tions for concession­s were not granted in a fair and transparen­t manner by Go-Invest. In fact, it says an examinatio­n of applicatio­ns that were rejected showed inconsiste­ncy in the granting of concession­s. (In one case that is highlighte­d, Dazzell Embroidery was not recommende­d because the type of business was never given a concession before, even though it was within Go-Invest’s remit.)

According to the report, based on a successful applicatio­n by the investor, Go-Invest would prepare a draft investment agreement, which would be sent to the Guyana revenue Authority (GRA) for review. GRA would them submit the draft to the Finance Minister for approval, after which it would be returned to the GRA. The report states that the GRA would then send the approved agreement to GoInvest indicating that the investor was required to apply to the Commission­er-General for tax exemptions on the list approved by the minister. However, it adds that all concession­s that were granted under the former administra­tions could not be verified since the related documentat­ion was not sent to Go-Invest. In fact, in some instances correspond­ence was addressed directly to the investor.

‘Abuse of concession­s

The report notes that the role of Go-Invest under the Investment Act of 2004, Section 39 or any other legislatio­n related to Go-Invest does not require the agency to monitor the concession­s granted to investors. “This has created the probabilit­y for large scale abuse of tax concession­s by investors using supplement­ary Investment Agreements and the obtaining of concession­s for products already received,” it states.

Nonetheles­s, it adds that GoInvest failed to sanction Baishanlin Internatio­nal Forest Developmen­t Inc, Vaitarna Holdings Private Inc, Diamond Tropical Wood Products Inc and Zhonghao Shipyards Inc for breaching their investment agreements.

The report cites Baishanlin’s commitment to setting up a wood processing facility at Conception, Linden Highway. Up to September 30, 2016, it says no facility was set up and the company exported raw lumber without processing and expanded into other industries, such as mining, real estate and shipping.

Baishanlin was incorporat­ed in Guyana in 2006, according to the report, and the main objective in its business plan was its utilisatio­n of the of the country’s forest resources “to produce from its processing plant a wide range of finished products.”

Based on file informatio­n, after the initial investment in 2007, there were three renewals and six supplement­al agreements between Baishanlin and GoInvest. It was noted that there was another initial investment agreement for Baishanlin related to real estate, among other sectors, although there were suggestion­s from a Go-Invest officer that the second agreement was inconsiste­nt with the agency’s policies.

“During the period 2007 to 2012 Bai Shan Lin was cutting and exporting raw lumber without processing it or creating value-added products. Bai Shan Lin benefitted from concession­s totaling G$1.8B during the period under the review 2011 – 2015,” the report says. “Concession­s were not monitored by GoInvest since there was no system in place to identify the concession given, its value or whether it is abused/illegally. It is evident that Bai Shan Lin’s real objective was to export raw lumber,” it adds.

Vaitarna is also cited for failing to fulfil a commitment to set up a wood processing facility at Wineperu, in Region 8. Up to July 31, 2016, the facility was not engaged in “any significan­t production” of wood products, the report states, while concession­s amounting to G$217M had been granted.

The company was incorporat­ed in 2010 and the initial investment agreement catered for dutyfree concession­s for equipment and machinery for forest extraction and road building. The agreement was renewed in 2012 and a tax waiver was granted for sawmill equipment. However, while the agreement was renewed the following year, then Go-Invest Chief Executive Officer Desmond Mohamed instructed that no further renewals be granted unless there was compliance with the conditions of the initial agreement.

‘Political directive’

Another investor, Toolise Persaud subsidiary Diamond Tropical Wood Products Inc, the report says, was granted over G$60M in concession­s to establish a wood processing facility but it never commenced operation at Diamond, East Bank Demerara.

It was noted that the company was granted concession­s in August, 2012. In that same year, the report says that then GoInvest CEO Mohamed, based on a political directive from then President Donald Ramotar, was advised by then GRA Commission­er-General Khurshid Sattaur to adjust an investor agreement with Diamond Tropical Wood Products Inc to reflect concession­s for a Toyota Land Cruiser. The report adds that he was also advised that as the project progressed, considerat­ion would also be given for concession­s on an additional Land Cruiser and pick-up.

“Mr. Mohamed was advised to submit the adjusted IA for the Finance Minister’s approval. The investor was told by then CEO of Go-Invest, Mr. David Mohamed that two vehicles instead of four would be recommende­d. One for the commenceme­nt of the project and the other during operations. Mr. Mohamed reiterated that GoInvest cannot recommend a 5seater Land Cruisers since such vehicles do not fall within the guidelines for concession­s,” the report states, before adding that Diamond Tropical Wood Products did not agree with the guidance from Go-Invest and had a meeting with Ramotar and Sattaur.

“…Mr. Mohamed by correspond­ence dated March 9, 2012 informed the Head of GRA that he could not comply since the President of Guyana had not given him any instructio­n. Mr. Mohamed was shortly thereafter reverted to his substantiv­e job at Guyana National Shipping Corporatio­n Ltd. Mr. Mohamed was succeeded by Mr. Keith Burrowes as CEO, the then Chairman of the Go-Invest [Board of Directors],” it adds.

Meanwhile, Zhonghao Shipyards Inc is cited in the report for also having breached its investment agreement, under which it benefitted from G$82.4M in concession­s. The company had been set up to create a shipyard and build and repair both local and foreign vessels. The report says evidence suggests that the company breached the agreement, while noting that it was unable to access all the informatio­n because the entire file could not be found by Go-Invest staff.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana