Stabroek News

WPA pillories gov’t on stalled constituti­on reform

-President says progress being made

-

Though the Working People’s Alliance (WPA) a member of the governing coalition - has expressed dissatisfa­ction with the APNU+AFC government’s failure to honour its manifesto promise of constituti­onal reform, President David Granger is insisting that progress is being made.

“We fought for the inclusion of Constituti­onal Reform as a very important and central plank of this (the APNU+AFC) manifesto. We are not satisfied that the government has moved purposeful­ly in terms of dealing with Constituti­onal Reform”, WPA member Dr. David Hinds told a press conference at the party’s Queenstown Headquarte­rs on Monday.

He said that the WPA has included constituti­onal reform in each of its manifestos since 1985.

Constituti­onal reform was one of the manifesto priorities of the APNU+AFC government during its 2015 elections campaign. Critics say it has spectacula­rly failed to live up to this key commitment.

The manifesto said that within three months of taking office, an APNU+AFC government would appoint a Commission to amend the Constituti­on with the full participat­ion of the people, which among other things, would reduce the powers of the president.

“APNU+AFC recognizes that the Constituti­on, in its current form, does not serve the best interest of Guyana or its people. Within three months of taking up office, APNU+AFC will appoint a Commission to amend the Constituti­on with the full participat­ion of the people. The new Constituti­on will put the necessary checks and balances in place to consolidat­e our ethos of liberal democracy. Freedom of speech, reduction of the power of the President and the Bill of Rights will be enshrined in the document,” the document stated.

The manifesto further stated that constituti­onal, electoral and parliament­ary reforms are imperative. In this regard, an APNU+AFC government upon taking office will immediatel­y appoint a Constituti­onal Reform Commission consisting of representa­tives of all major stakeholde­rs – trades unions, the private sector, religious and faith-based organisati­ons, women, youths, profession­al organizati­ons and the University.

It has not met this commitment. Months after it entered power, it set up a Steering Committee on Constituti­onal Reform (SCCR) in August, 2015. Attorneys Nigel Hughes, Gino Persaud and Geeta Chandan-Edmond, as well as Professor Harold Lutchman and the late Haslyn Parris were on the committee. The remit of the committee was to give direction and scope within which the constituti­onal reform process should take place. The SCCR submitted a report to the government on April 30, 2016 but this to date has not been released by the government to the public although Stabroek News has reported on its contents.

In February, in what many saw as a delaying tactic, a team of constituti­onal experts from the United Nations (UN) system arrived here to conduct a constituti­onal reform needs assessment mission. The report produced by the UN experts was also not made public by the government but Stabroek News has reported on it.

Hinds told reporters that since the submission of the SCCR report, Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo keeps saying “we are going to bring things on stream, we are going to bring things on stream (but) we are dissatisfi­ed with that. We feel that Constituti­onal Reform is critical to everything that we are doing because constituti­onal reform has to do with the way the state for example is reconstruc­ted…with the allocation of power…with the whole question of ethnicity and the sharing of power in this country.”

Hinds said that the party feels verily strongly about the “reduction of the powers of the President. We feel that despite some modificati­on, the last time around in 1999/2001 that the presidenti­al powers are still too much and we will like to see a modificati­on of those powers”. Immediatel­y According to Hinds that reduction of powers is among the things the WPA feels needs to be done immediatel­y. “…that constituti­onal reform should be put on the table as a central plank. Ultimately government­s come and government­s go but it is

important that we have rules of engagement which is what a constituti­on is, rules of engagement that assure the population of this country that their security whether they be working people or whether they be ethnic communitie­s that their securities are guaranteed constituti­onally and so therefore we feel that constituti­onal reform is extremely important and we would argue within the APNU and the wider government for a kick-starting of the constituti­onal reform process and to make good on our promise in the manifesto”, he said.

However, when quizzed on this at State House yesterday, Granger said that government is now looking at money to finance the process. Noting that Prime Minister Nagamootoo is responsibl­e for moving the constituti­onal reform pro-cess along, Granger told reporters, “we have made some progress... we had the first proposal. I think there is a question now of financing the process because we want to have a consultati­ve process but it is moving it hasn’t been halted”.

It is unclear why money is not yet available as Finance Minister Winston Jordan in his budget presentati­on for 2017 on November 28 last year had said that $80m had been allocated in the 2017 budget for constituti­onal reform. With half of the year almost finished there is no sign from the Prime Minister’s office of any consultati­ons beginning.

Jordan had said “Mr. Speaker, the Constituti­on of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana is the bedrock of governance and serves to secure the fundamenta­l rights and establish the rule of law for all Guyanese. Therefore, in a young democratic society such as ours that is still evolving, constituti­onal and parliament­ary reforms will continue to attract the attention of this Administra­tion.

“In the new year, the Government will work assiduousl­y to accelerate the constituti­onal reform process. In this regard, an administra­tive secretaria­t will be establishe­d to manage the reform process and support the consultati­ons, which are scheduled to begin in 2017. Consistent with the broad tenets of participat­ory democracy, the Constituti­onal Reform Commission will hold consultati­ons in all ten administra­tive regions. Over one hundred communitie­s will be engaged in consultati­ons and hearings and the entire process is expected to last for at least two years. A sum of $80 million has been set aside for this process, in 2017”.

The Guyana Human Rights Associatio­n, while welcoming the UN systems experts in February, said it was discourage­d by government’s seeming ambivalenc­e to constituti­onal reform and expressed the hope that domestic interest in the issue would be revitalize­d.

The Carter Center in collaborat­ion with the UK High Commission in Guyana held a public symposium on the country’s constituti­onal reform process on March 31. Despite much talk and expression­s of concern about the current state of the constituti­on, the attendance was not as big as expected. Very few youth turned up at the forum which was held at the University of Guyana’s Turkeyen campus. There was no senior member of the APNU+AFC government present at this event.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana