Stabroek News

Court says Slovenia should have corridor to int’l waters in dispute with Croatia

-

THE HAGUE, (Reuters) - An internatio­nal arbitratio­n court yesterday handed Slovenia victory in a longstandi­ng maritime dispute with Croatia, granting it direct access to internatio­nal waters in the Adriatic Sea. The Permanent Court of Arbitratio­n’s decision is final and binding, but Croatia, which withdrew from the proceeding­s in 2015, said it would ignore the ruling.

The court found that Slovenia should have “uninterrup­ted access” to the sea it shares with Croatia, presiding Judge Gilbert Guillaume said, in the case between the European Union neighbours. “This decision is not legally binding for us in any way and we have no intention to implement it,” Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic said in a reaction.

“We’re open for a bilateral dialogue with Slovenia and we do not expect from Slovenia any one-sided action on this issue,” Plenkovic said.

Slovenia’s government welcomed the ruling, calling it “definitive and legally binding”.

“Slovenia will continue its good cooperatio­n with Croatia and will not do anything that would aggravate mutual relations,” Slovenian Prime Minister Miro Cerar told a news conference. The countries have been arguing over a stretch of their sea and land border since both declared independen­ce from the former Yugoslavia in 1991 as it disintegra­ted into war and broke up. The dispute, which centres on the bay of Piran, held up Croatian accession to the EU for many years. Only after both parties agreed to arbitratio­n was Zagreb granted entry to the bloc in 2013. The court has now ruled that Slovenia gets the vast majority of the Piran bay area recognised as its territoria­l waters. In addition, the tribunal establishe­d a 2.5 nautical-mile wide and some 10 nautical-mile long corridor through Croatian waters to give Slovenia much-coveted direct access to internatio­nal waters.

“The zone shall give freedom of communicat­ion to all ships and aircraft, civil and military, of any state for the purpose of access to Slovenia,” the court ruled.

Croatia withdrew from the arbitratio­n procedures in 2015 after a leaked tape showed a Slovenian judge on the panel improperly exchanging confidenti­al informatio­n with the Ljubljana government.

The judge involved resigned and the court decided to continue with the case, saying the incident had not compromise­d the court’s ability to reach a final verdict.

It added that rule violations did not allow Croatia to withdraw from the arbitratio­n process.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana