Stabroek News

PPP/C MPs defend former gov’t’s broadcast licence awards

-say political connection­s irrelevant

-

Opposition People’s Progressiv­e Party/Civic (PPP/C) parliament­arians on Saturday defended their former government’s controvers­ial granting of broadcast licences, while accusing the current government of stretching the truth in levelling charges of nepotism.

At a press conference last Saturday, PPP/C member Anil Nandlall said that during the debate on the recently passed amendments to the broadcasti­ng legislatio­n, the government’s speakers downplayed the infringeme­nts on press freedom that were being introduced and instead tried to convey the impression that licences were solely granted to friends and cronies of the then PPP/C government.

He, however, reminded that during the debate on the bill he had urged that those who were granted but did not qualify for broadcast licences be pointed out. “The fact that someone may be close to a political party and benefits from a licence cannot be a ground to disqualify that person. The constituti­on guarantees to every one of you the right and the freedom to support the party of your choice and… not to be discrimina­ted against if you choose to support a political party of your choice. So that is irrelevant to the granting of those licences,” he argued.

Nandlall said that those granted licences came from a range of geographic­al locations and ethnic background­s.

While acknowledg­ing his understand­ing of people’s dissatisfa­ction with the way the licences were granted, Nandlall stressed that the truth is that persons who are claiming they were not granted licences did not apply following the implementa­tion of the 2011 legislatio­n. “There are many people who are claiming that they should have been granted licences but they did not apply? So how are they gonna get licences?” he questioned.

Nandlall and opposition Chief Whip Gail Teixeira did not deny that there were relatives of PPP members, including former President Bharrat Jagdeo, who were on the list of recipients but added that the current government’s position was that all on the recipients were relatives, which is untrue.

Teixeira said that it was the Advisory Committee on Broadcasti­ng (ACB) that received applicatio­ns and in turn made recommenda­tions.

She explained that a licence was granted only after the National Management Frequency Unit (NMFU) would have indicated that spectrum was available and the equipment of the applicants was examined. She said that it was the advisory team who would have made the recommenda­tions to Jagdeo. Teixeira’s argument about the ACB has long been refuted as there was no functionin­g ACB in place at the time Jagdeo made the awards.

Further, the ACB was only meant to be an interim mechanism and Jagdeo had given a commitment not to issue new licences without the required broadcasti­ng authority in place.

Teixeira added that during the debate on Friday, she read out the list of names of those who were granted licences and was repeatedly interrupte­d. She said that she attempted to inquire which of them were Jagdeo’s relatives, after Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo said that it was his relatives who benefitted from licences.

Reading

According to Teixeira, after the reading of the names, it was said that relatives doesn’t necessaril­y mean brother or sister but rather that the beneficiar­ies were “PPP.”

“Clearly from the names we read out, they are not PPP nor are they relatives of Jagdeo,” she, however, said, before adding that while many claimed they applied for licences, no applicatio­ns were found after several inquiries.

Asked whether recipient Kamini Persaud, wife of former PPP/C Minister Robert Persaud, is not Jagdeo’s niece, and recipient Vishok Persaud is not the son of late former PPP stalwart Reepu Daman Persaud, Teixeira responded, “If we go down that road…then we have to ask some other questions.”

Kamini Persaud operated iRADIO, while Vishok Persaud is the owner of cable provider E-Networks.

Teixeira then singled out Minister within the Ministry of Finance Jaipaul Sharma, who is the son of CN and Savitri Sharma, the owners of CNS Channel 6, and Dr. Noel Blackman, of HBTV Channel 9, who was granted a licence while he was a Minister of Health under the former PNC government. The Sharmas had been broadcasti­ng for nearly two decades before Jaipaul Sharma became a minister.

Asked if Guyana Publicatio­ns Inc (GPI), the publisher of the Stabroek News, applied for a licence before or after 2011, Nandlall said that he was unaware of any such applicatio­n after 2011 and was not sure that there was one prior to 2011. GPI had applied before 2011 and had protested that it was not issued a licence while several others who had had no standing in the media were conferred with licences.

Teixeira, when ask if she has any recollecti­on of when the applicatio­n was made, responded “no,” before adding that it must be understood that all applicatio­ns went to the Advisory Committee on Broadcasti­ng and then the National Broadcasti­ng Authority after 2012. “I am not aware,” she said, before advising that the authority be asked about the matter.

Old applicants

Nandlall said after the 2011 Act, old applicants were invited through a public notice to reapply. “I am saying that many of those who may have applied earlier did not re-apply so how can they get the licence?” he asked. Some applicants like GPI which had been overlooked did not re-apply after 2011 as it would have constitute­d a validating of the Jagdeo awards.

Days before demitting office in November, 2011, Jagdeo issued 22 radio broadcast licences. However, the licencees were not identified until almost a year and a half later after questions were raised in the National Assembly.

Broadcaste­r Enrico Woolford, in a court action that had been filed to challenge the awards, had contended that 15 of the FM broadcasti­ng licences and frequency assignment­s were made to three companies, including Radio Guyana Inc., which is owned by Dr. Ranjisingh­i Ramroop, a close friend of Jagdeo. Ramroop was granted five radio broadcast licences and assigned five frequencie­s in the FM band – 89.3, 89.5, 89.7, 106.9 and 107.3MHz.

Woolford had also said that Telecor and Cultural Broadcasti­ng Inc., was also granted five radio broadcast licences and assigned five frequencie­s in the FM band 89.7, 90.1, 91.5, 104,9 MHz and 103.3. He noted that the directors were Kamini Persaud,; Ruth Baljit, the sister of then Minister, Robert Persaud; Omar Lochan, then Deputy Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Natural Resources and Secretary of Telecor, husband of Jaya Manickchan­d, who is the sister of Priya Manickchan­d, the then Minister of Education.

Woolford had said too that the New Guyana Co. Ltd., a company owned by the People’s Progressiv­e Party, was granted five Radio Broadcast licences and was also assigned five frequencie­s in the FM band 91.1, 90.7, 90.5, 105.9 and 105.3MHz. He noted that for NTN Radio 89.1 MHz, the contact person named was Anand Persaud, who is the owner and Chief Executive Officer of National Telecommun­ications Network Inc, a close friend of Jagdeo and a strong supporter of the PPP/C.

He had also pointed out that Hits and Jams was granted 94.1 MHz, with the contact person named by the Prime Minister being Rawle Ferguson “an active supporter” of the PPP.

Woolford’s own applicatio­n for a licence had been ignored.

 ??  ?? Bharrat Jagdeo
Bharrat Jagdeo
 ??  ?? Anil Nandlall
Anil Nandlall
 ??  ?? Gail Teixeira
Gail Teixeira

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana