Stabroek News

Signing bonus was received from Exxon Mobil

-gov’t silence raises doubts over openness, probity

-

US oil company Exxon Mobil did pay a signing bonus following the new agreement it clinched with the government on June 27, 2016 and why this was kept secret will pile pressure on the Granger administra­tion over its claims to transparen­cy particular­ly given concerns over accounting for revenue from the petroleum sector.

Stabroek News has seen correspond­ence (reproduced on this page) dated September 20, 2016 from the Ministry of Finance to the Bank of Guyana (Bog) pertaining to arrangemen­ts for the signing bonus. The letter did not specify the quantum of the bonus but commentato­r Christophe­r Ram said in October that he was told that US $20M was paid. This

statement was not contradict­ed by the government. Pressed for answers, Minister of Natural Resources Raphael Trotman would only say that that Cabinet would deliberate on the question of making the June 27 contract available to the public. On November 30, Minister of State Joseph Harmon said that the contract and presumably any informatio­n on the signing bonus would be made available sometime this month.

Aside from the secrecy over the bonus, the depositing of the funds at the Bo G and outside of the Consolidat­ed Fund would raise grave concern as this government when in opposition had been critical of monies kept outside of the Consolidat­ed Fund and the accountabi­lity framework.

In the correspond­ence seen by Stabroek News, Finance Secretary in the Ministry of Finance, Dr Hector Butts wrote to the Governor of the BOG, Dr Gobind Ganga with the reference line ‘Signing bonus granted by Exxon Mobil – Request to open bank account’.

Butts said in the letter “I shall be grateful if you would arrange for the undermenti­oned Foreign Currency Account to be opened at Bank of Guyana, in order to receive a deposit in the form of a signing bonus to be given by Exxon Mobil. This account should not be treated as part of the Bank’s reserves. Instead, the proceeds should be held in the currency of the deposit, that is, United States dollars, and invested in secured interest-bearing securities”.

Butts went on to say that the authorized signatorie­s to the account were himself, his deputy, Louise Bouyea, Accountant General Jawahar Persaud and his deputy Jennifer Chapman.

The letter was copied to the Minister of Natural Resources, Raphael Trotman.

Who negotiated the signing bonus, the terms of such a payment and what has since become of the money are questions the government will likely face pressure over.

In February of this year, Trotman informed that minor modificati­ons to the original contract with Exxon Mobil subsidiary Esso Exploratio­n and Production Guyana Limited (EEGPL) were made and had justified the non-disclosure by saying that only “salient points” of the contract agreement will be made public for security and other reasons.

“In so far as full disclosure at this point in time, I think government is of the view that full disclosure would not be to the best of the national benefit or national interest,” Trotman had told a media breakfast where his ministry and Exxon Mobil provided updates on the nascent oil and gas sector.

The issue attracted additional public scrutiny when columnist Ram stated in October this year in Stabroek News that he understood that some US $20M was paid to the government as a signing bonus.

With Stabroek News consistent­ly probing as to why the contract could not be made public, Trotman then said in October that he would take the issue of disclosure to Cabinet for discussion and guidance on the way forward.

“Nothing on the contract I am discussing. I would like to take this whole issue of the publicatio­n of the contract to Cabinet for guidance because it is not a Trotman issue it is a government position and I won’t be able to discuss it,” he said when asked about whether government had collected a signature bonus from Exxon Mobil when a new agreement was signed with it.

Following Trotman’s position, in early November, Government’s Petroleum Advisor, Jan Mangal, said that he had advised government to make the contract public but believed with public pressure the contract would be released quicker.

“My terms of reference with the President, I had transparen­cy as the number one item. So I constantly push for transparen­cy. I believe that all contracts should be made public. Not only petroleum, Diamonds gold, timber these are all resources of the people and all of these contracts should be made public. That is my objective. I am an advisor and I obviously can only advise. That is continuall­y my advice that these contracts be made public because in the long term that is what would help Guyana,” he stated.

“Of course the signing bonus (if paid) needs to be made public. It needs to be auditable. People need to have confidence in their representa­tives and the way to do that is by having transparen­cy,” he added.

Mangal said that heightened demand from citizens for the release of the contract and answers as to whether a US$20M signature bonus was paid here could see a faster release of informatio­n and felt that if the people believe it was important enough they should press the issue.

“I believe the civil society and the people have a large role to play and it would probably be quicker if civil society and the people believe it was important and voiced their beliefs,” Mangal posited.

Further, he added, “Ultimately they will publish it but it might be quicker if there is some pressure.”

On the same day Mangal spoke, Trotman, via a statement through the Ministry of the Presidency, reiterated his earlier position.

“The Government has taken a decision at this point in time not to release the full contract. We have released quite a few details in fact and if persons are wise enough, and many are, you can put pieces together to get a sense of what is the contract but there are a number of extenuatin­g and external issues which are being attended to, some of them have foreign affairs implicatio­ns, some of them have sovereignt­y implicatio­ns, some have national security implicatio­ns and Government has been advised by external advisors and lawyers that at this point in time, that we should not bare all,” the release quoted him as saying.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana