Stabroek News

Auditor General wants info from private developer for D'Urban Park probe

-

With the Republic flag-raising ceremony set to be hosted at the D’Urban Park facility again on Thursday, Stabroek News remedial works on the VIP section have started. When visited the facility yesterday, the entire floor of the VIP area was being replaced. The workers had already removed half of the plywood floor and were in the process of repairing it with new materials. Last year, in May, remedial works were also done on the facility, including the VIP section in preparatio­n for the 51st anniversar­y celebratio­ns. Director of National Events, Colonel Godfrey Bess had confirmed that the works featured a major overhaul of the floor of the VIP section. Despite the more than $1b spent on the facility, critics have said poor work and substandar­d material have created more expense.

Auditor General Deodat Sharma says that he is awaiting some informatio­n from Homestretc­h Developmen­t Inc (HDI) before he completes his investigat­ion of the controvers­ial billion-dollar D’Urban Park Developmen­t Project.

“We need the informatio­n in order to finalise that aspect of the investigat­ion,” he told Stabroek News on Monday, while noting that if needs be he will conclude his investigat­ion without it. Sharma dispatched a letter about two weeks ago requesting specific informatio­n.

He said that he is not satisfied that he will be able to make a definitive conclusion without the documents requested. “That company, they would have collected money. We don’t know how much money they collected and we don’t know what type of expenditur­es they did before the Ministry of Public Works took it (the project) over,” he said.

Sharma recalled that it was previously said in Parliament that the company had handed over all the documents to the Ministry. He said that he subsequent­ly wrote to the ministry’s Permanent Secretary, who said that he didn’t have any informatio­n. It was based on this fact that he took the decision to write the company, requesting the required informatio­n.

The financing of this controvers­ial project has been seen as a test of the government’s openness and willingnes­s to be accountabl­e on the expenditur­e of public funds.

It is difficult to ascertain when exactly the idea of the project was born but based on what has been published in the media the idea was birthed soon after President David Granger took office on May 16th, 2015.At the time, the area was covered with thick vegetation and trees; residents of Hadfield Street and surroundin­g areas grazed their horses and cows there.

The clearing of D’Urban Park was part of a massive cleanup campaign in Georgetown ahead of the country’s 50th Independen­ce celebratio­ns. In May that year, the area immediatel­y behind the 1763 monument was cleared of the thick bush.

A flag raising ceremony was held at the nearby Independen­ce Arch on the morning of May 26. Over time, the area cleared was extended. From all the informatio­n available, government shouldered the cost up to this point.

It later became evident that the area would be used as a green space for recreation­al activity. By October that year, the entire area was transforme­d; it was free of bushes and trees and had been filled with sand.

In November of 2015, Minister Raphael Trotman had announced that Cabinet had given the go ahead for contracts for the transforma­tion of D’Urban Park into a “Green Zone Recreation­al Park,” in time for Guyana’s 50th Anniversar­y celebratio­ns the following year.

The goal of the rehabilita­tion works was to redesign the location into a site similar to that of the Washington Monument area in Washington, DC in the US. Trotman had explained that the overgrown vegetation would be removed in order to create a recreation­al facility, where persons of all ages could exercise or simply relax.

It was around this time that the name Larry London became associated with the project. It would subsequent­ly be revealed that London was a part owner of HDI. However from all indication­s, HDI, through donations both from local persons and those in the diaspora, commenced work at the site in September, 2015, about two months before government officially announced what was happening there.

By the time Trotman made the announceme­nt, questions were being asked as to who was paying for the works being done at the site. PPP/C MP Gail Teixeira would later state that HDI, despite overseeing the work at the site, was never registered until January, 2016. Things began to unravel in April, 2016 when this newspaper reported that the wooden stands were poorly built and with inferior materials.

A few weeks after this newspaper’s report, Granger announced that Public Infrastruc­ture Minister David Patterson would immediatel­y assume full responsibi­lity for the project. Patterson and his ministry, with some assistance from the Guyana Defence Force, saw the project to completion in time for the May 26th flag raising ceremony.

Approximat­ely half a billion dollars were spent by government on the project and despite this, the National Assembly was asked to approve extrabudge­tary spending.

In August 2016, Minister of Finance Winston Jordan tabled Financial Paper 1/2016 in the House, which covered $931,018,292 in extra government spending from January 1st to July 28th of that year.

The figures showed that an initial $72.8 million was previously approved for the D’Urban Park Developmen­t Project and government was seeking approval for a further $406.7 million, which had already been spent. The $479.6 million total which was spent by government does not include donations from companies and citizens. Previously, Patterson had said that $150 million was provided from the Contingenc­ies Fund to complete Phase 1 of the project. In a statement in May that year, he had also revealed that donations were made to a registered company under a separate head outside of the ministry.

It has been revealed that then Education Minister Dr Rupert Roopnarain­e was a director of HDI. Granger has defended him saying that the minister’s role was only to represent the government’s interest.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana