Stabroek News

Australia slaps 12-month bans on Smith and Warner

-

JOHANNESBU­RG, (Reuters) Sacked Australia captain Steve Smith and David Warner have both been banned for 12 months for their roles in the ball-tampering scandal in Cape Town, Cricket Australia (CA) announced yesterday, after uncovering a web of lies told by the players after they were caught.

Opening batsman Cameron Bancroft was banned for nine months following the scandal, which has outraged the fans, jolted the sponsors and prompted CA to send the players home from South Africa.

The trio will be allowed to compete in club cricket, but cannot take part in state or internatio­nal games for the duration of their bans.

“David Warner will not be considered for team leadership positions in the future,” CA said in the statement, having fingered him in developing the plot.

Smith and Bancroft will have to wait two years before they are considered for leadership roles, and even then it will “be conditiona­l on acceptance by fans and the public”, according to CA.

Each player must also complete 100 hours of community service before being considered for future selection, while it was confirmed that the cheat had been confined to the trio only, exoneratin­g team mates and coach Darren Lehmann of any wrong-doing.

“This is a terrible situation. There are three guys going home that have been offered sanctions that are lifechangi­ng,” Cricket Australia CEO James Sutherland told reporters yesterday.

“There is a rebuild that needs to happen to reinstate the faith and the confidence, and I guess the pride that the Australian public had and should have in the Australian cricket team.”

SANDPAPER USE

A key finding was that Bancroft had in fact used sandpaper to rough up the ball in the third test at Newlands, and not sticky tape as he stated, though Sutherland doubted this showed the cheat had been planned prior to the match or the days’ play.

“I’m not sure it’s normal procedure, but I do understand that sandpaper is often in the dressing room or in the players’ kit bags,” he said.

Warner was also found guilty of “provision of advice to a junior player (Bancroft) regarding how a ball could be artificial­ly altered including demonstrat­ing how it could be done”.

Part of the findings against Smith and Bancroft were that they had mislead both the umpires on the field of play, and the public in a press conference as to the “the nature, extent and participan­ts of the plan”.

While Smith and Bancroft were both found guilty of “knowledge” of the plan to cheat, a CA statement credits Warner with the “developmen­t” of the plot, suggesting he was the instigator.

All three have the right to appeal their sentences.

Sutherland also said that there would be a review into the team culture and conduct of players.

“Questions (are) obviously being asked of lots of people as to why or how that might have happened,” he said.

“That’s part of the purpose of later discussion and review. We’ll clearly take on board whatever comes out of such investigat­ions.

“We cannot have this happen again. It’s just unquestion­able and so obvious. If there are things that allow little things to turn into big things that allow this to happen, then you’ve got to go back to the core and find out what the little things are and address them. That is what we’ll be doing.”

FINANCIAL FALLOUT

Smith and Warner have also been stood down from their Indian Premier League (IPL) teams for 2018, representi­ng a significan­t loss of income after the Rajasthan Royals and Sunrisers Hyderabad had paid $1.84-million respective­ly for their services.

“We have decided to bar them from this season. The replacemen­ts will be made available to the two teams,” IPL chairman Rajeev Shukla told reporters.

There is more financial fallout possible with multinatio­nal electronic­s company LG having already said they will not renew a sponsorshi­p with Warner, while several other partners of CricketAus­tralia are reviewing their positions in light of the embarrassi­ng scandal.

The trio will be replaced for the fourth and final test at The Wanderers in Johannesbu­rg by opening batsmen Matthew Renshaw and Joe Burns, as well as all-rounder Glenn Maxwell.

South Africa lead what has been a tempestuou­s series 2-1 having not enjoyed a home test series success against the Australian­s since 1970.

Steve Smith, David Warner and Cameron Bancroft have been charged with a breach of Article 2.3.5 of the CA Code of Conduct, namely that their conduct: (a) was contrary to the spirit of the game; (b) was unbecoming of a representa­tive or official; (c) is or could be harmful to the interests of cricket; and/or (d) did bring the game of cricket into disrepute.

In respect of the individual players concerned, Cricket Australia advises the following:

Steve Smith was charged with a breach of Article 2.3.5 of the CA Code of Conduct based on:

(a) knowledge of a potential plan to attempt to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball;

(b) failure to take steps to seek to prevent the developmen­t and implementa­tion of that plan;

(c) directing that evidence of attempted tampering be concealed on the field of play;

(d) seeking to mislead Match Officials and others regarding Bancroft’s attempts to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball; and

(e) misleading public comments regarding the nature, extent and participan­ts of the plan

David Warner was charged with a breach of Article 2.3.5 of the CA Code of Conduct based on:

(a) developmen­t of a plan to attempt to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball;

(b) instructio­n to a junior player to carry out a plan to take steps to attempt to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball using sandpaper;

(c) provision of advice to a junior player regarding how a ball could be artificial­ly altered including demonstrat­ing how it could be done;

(d) failure to take steps to seek to prevent the developmen­t and/or implementa­tion of the plan;

(e) failure to report his knowledge of the plan at any time prior to or during the match;

(f) misleading Match Officials through the concealmen­t of his knowledge of and involvemen­t in the plan; and

(g) failure to voluntaril­y report his knowledge of the plan after the match

Cameron Bancroft was charged with a breach of Article 2.3.5 of the CA Code of Conduct based on:

(a) knowledge of the existence of, and being party to, the plan to attempt to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball using sandpaper;

(b) carrying out instructio­ns to attempt to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball;

(c) seeking to conceal evidence of his attempts to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball;

(d) seeking to mislead Match Officials and others regarding his attempts to artificial­ly alter the condition of the ball; and

(e) misleading public comments regarding the nature, extent, implementa­tion and participan­ts of the plan

SUMMARY OF SANCTIONS

The range of sanctions available to Cricket Australia under Article 2.3.5 are extensive. The CA Board determined sanctions that would be appropriat­e in each player’s case, following their review of the report.

The Board has considered the recommenda­tions and determined that the following sanctions will be offered to each player in accordance with the CA Code of Conduct process:

Steve Smith Suspension of 12 months from all internatio­nal and domestic cricket

David Warner Suspension of 12 months from all internatio­nal and domestic cricket

Cameron Bancroft Suspension of 9 months from all internatio­nal and domestic cricket

All three players will be permitted to play club cricket and will be encouraged to do so to maintain links with the cricket community.

In addition, all three players will be required to undertake 100 hours of voluntary service in community cricket.

 ??  ?? Steve Smith
Steve Smith
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana