Stabroek News

Social media vs the news

-

The defamation lawsuits against Infowars founder Alex Jones and his subsequent removal (“de-platformin­g”) from Apple, Facebook, Spotify and YouTube vividly illustrate what is at stake in the battles over who gets to determine the tone and content of America’s public sphere. The tech giants’ long overdue decision to address Jones’s hateful assertions and conspiracy theories – which they have helped to distribute, profitably – suggests their vulnerabil­ity to legal and regulatory action. At the same time, however public resistance to the perceived muzzling – downloads of the Infowars app immediatel­y surged in Google’s and Apple’s online stores – show how deeply politicize­d the issue has become, and how likely it is to further inflame debate over the necessary limits for free speech on campus, in digital forums and in public life.

Most skirmishes in what might be called the social media wars have centred on similar flashpoint­s. Each new incident has shown that the convergenc­e of media and entertainm­ent has distorted the public sphere in ways that may prove irreparabl­e. As Philip Howard, a professor of internet studies at Oxford, notes in a recent Foreign Policy article “Social media platforms are designed to deliberate­ly exploit the common predilecti­on for selective exposure — the tendency to favour informatio­n that confirms pre-existing views — to reinforce messaging from advertisin­g clients, lobbyists, political campaign managers, and even foreign government­s.” Immured in our digital echo-chambers, we have learned to adopt and embrace political opinions of every stripe, including the most marginal and fantastica­l, with religious intensity while allowing the former give-and-take of democratic discourse to disappear almost completely.

Consider, for example, the aftermath of the Parkland school shooting earlier this year. Immediatel­y, Russian controlled Twitter bots began to promote hashtags on both sides of the gun control debate – successful­ly polarizing the discussion before it had a chance to consider anything else. Shortly afterwards - echoing assertions about Sandy Hook – there were even conspiracy theories that one of the Parkland survivors was a “crisis actor” playing the role of a victim.

Similar provocatio­ns and have been used to amplify the digital noise surroundin­g Black Lives Matter and other social movements. This sort of interferen­ce not only skews public debate away from productive discussion­s, it undermines democracy. The age of Big Data has enabled social media companies and dataminers – the line between them is blurred and fading – to weaponise news through the manipulati­on

of our personal data. As Howard observes this “has helped heighten ethnic tensions, revive nationalis­m, intensify political conflict, and even produce new political crises in countries around the world — all while weakening public trust in journalism, voting systems, and electoral outcomes.”

The influence of conspiracy theories on public opinion should not be underestim­ated. Three years after the 9/11 attacks a Zogby poll found that 49 percent of respondent­s believed the US government “knew in advance that attacks were planned … [and] consciousl­y failed to act.” Two years later 36 percent of those polled by a Scripps-Howard survey believed that “federal officials either participat­ed in the attacks on the World Trade Center or took no action to stop them”. As the legal scholar Cass Sunstein has noted, when a population no longer shares a repository of agreed facts on such key issues, it can easily succumb to anti democratic levels of disinforma­tion and distrust.

Cambridge Analytica’s questionab­le past in the Caribbean has already shown the dangers of granting social media companies and data miners access to our data. The ubiquity of similar scandals elsewhere suggests that other political actors in the Caribbean are likely to manipulate public opinion in similar ways. If, like US regulators and politician­s, we fail to recognize this threat and take appropriat­e countermea­sures, it would be naive to expect our public sphere to fare any better.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana