Stabroek News

Funds for $1.15B D’Urban Park sourced from road repairs, infrastruc­ture allocation­s

-no checks made on $500M paid to HDI for creditors

-

In addition to tapping into the Contingenc­y and Lotto funds, the Ministry of Public Infrastruc­ture (MPI) sourced money from its road works and infrastruc­ture developmen­t budget to complete D’Urban Park, according to the preliminar­y findings of the Auditor General, which also said there is no evidence of checks on works for which the private company that started the project was given half a billion.

The findings of an ongoing special investigat­ion into the spending associated with the controvers­ial project were included in the 2017 Auditor General’s report on the public accounts of Guyana, which was presented to the National Assembly yesterday. The Audit Office commenced the investigat­ion earlier this year.

The report says that up to December 31st, 2017, amounts totaling almost $1.150 billion were spent on the project.

Providing a breakdown, the report states that in 2015, $36,509,000 was sourced from the Lotto Fund, while in 2016, $60,394,000 came from Infrastruc­tural Developmen­t under MPI; $118,124,000 from Maintenanc­e of Roads under MPI, and sums of $150 million and $256,758,000 from the Contingenc­y Fund. In 2017, $500 million was sourced from Infrastruc­tural Develop-ment and $28,215, 000 from Maintenanc­e of other Infrastruc­ture. The grand total of these amounts is $1,149,997,000.

The 2015 figure was referenced in that year’s Auditor General’s report, which noted that no approval was given for the use of that money. The 2017 report did not expound on the money taken directly from the ministry.

The report says payment vouchers to support expenditur­e totalling $107.119 million were not produced for audit examinatio­n. As a result, it stated that “the completene­ss, accuracy, and validity of this amount could not be determined.”

Homestretc­h Developmen­t Inc (HDI), a private company with Larry London as one of its principals, started the project in September, 2015, about two months before government officially announced what was happening.

The report states that the sum of $500 million was paid to HDI in 2017 by MPI to enable it to meet its obligation to its creditors. “However, there was no documentat­ion attached to the Payment Vouchers to indicate the works done, supervisor­y checks carried out on the works, as well as certificat­ion that the works were satisfacto­rily completed,” it said while reiteratin­g that only the list of HDI’s creditors and government’s proposed payment allocation to each creditor was attached to the Payment Vouchers. “In the circumstan­ces, the correctnes­s, accuracy and validity of the payments made could not be determined,” the document said.

It added that in response to a request for documentat­ion, the Permanent Secretary explained that the Ministry was “not involved in the operations of HDI; hence, it did not have any informatio­n detailing supervisor­y checks or their methodolog­y of determinin­g that works were satisfacto­rily completed.”

Subject Minister David Patterson had explained to the National Assembly in November 2016 that HDI wrote to the Finance Ministry asking for assistance with liabilitie­s owed to persons and companies that contribute­d services and materials for the project.

The minister identified some of the contributo­rs to the project as Baishanlin, Courtney Benn Contractin­g, BK Internatio­nal, Palm Court, National Hardware, Buxton Gas Station, and Puran Brothers.

PPP/C MP Juan Edghill had asked the minister to provide the names of persons owed, how much was owed, and what works were conducted, as well as to state whether the “project that from all estimation cost $900 million of taxpayer money plus $60 million in cash and kind donations, can be defined as a project done by private funding”, before questionin­g the procuremen­t process used to engage persons.

Several days later, Finance Minister Winston Jordan informed that the $500 million allocated to pay debts owed by HDI for the project was the full and final settlement the government was willing to make.

It is unclear when the special investigat­ion will be completed.

HDI commenced work on the site using donations

both from local persons and those in the diaspora.

In November of 2015, then Governance Minister Raphael Trotman an-nounced that Cabinet had given the go ahead for contracts for the transforma­tion of D’Urban Park into a “Green Zone Recreation­al Park,” in time for Guyana’s 50th anniversar­y celebratio­ns in the following year.

However, a month before the independen­ce celebratio­ns, President David Granger announced that the MPI was taking over the project. There had been embarrassi­ng disclosure­s about the poor constructi­on work on the stands that were built to hold an estimated 19,000 spectators for the May 26th event.

Former Auditor General Anand Goolsarran had called for a forensic audit of the project. In a column which appeared in this newspaper in December 2016, he had pointed out that there were missteps in the execution of the project.

“This was perhaps due to a lack of proper advice in terms of adherence to the relevant constituti­onal, legislativ­e and regulatory requiremen­ts relating to the use of funds garnered for the project…,” Goolsarran had said.

“In the final analysis, it is the taxpaying public that has to come to the rescue of meeting the financial obligation­s of the project which, with careful planning, might have resulted in significan­t cost savings. The past cannot be undone but whatever happened in relation to the project should serve as an important lesson for the avoidance of a repeat of the mistakes made,” he added.

 ??  ?? An aerial view of D’Urban Park
An aerial view of D’Urban Park

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana