Stabroek News

Errant contractor­s could be debarred up to five years

-PPC finalising regulation­s

-

After years of delays in the crafting of regulation­s, errant contractor­s could soon face debarment of up to five years as the Public Procuremen­t Commission (PPC) gears up for implementa­tion.

If a contractor or supplier has a history of unsatisfac­tory performanc­e of one or more contracts or subcontrac­ts then they are liable for debarment, the Draft Regulation­s on Suspension and Debarment from Participat­ion in Public Procuremen­t states.

Debarment shall be for a minimum of one year and not for more than five years, according to the draft.

The PPC has embarked on a series of stakeholde­r meetings on the proposed regulation­s. The draft stemmed from a series of consultati­ons and has been published on the PPC website for feedback.

The regulation­s note that the serious nature of debarment requires that it be imposed only in the public interest and that debarment is discretion­ary and may be imposed only on the suggested grounds.

According to the draft, violations of the terms of a procuremen­t contract or subcontrac­t so serious as to justify debarment, include but are not limited to a history of unsatisfac­tory performanc­e of one or more contracts or subcontrac­ts; a history of failure to perform one or more contracts or subcontrac­ts; a history of failure to comply with the Income Tax Act, the National Insurance and Social Security Act, the Environmen­tal Protection Act, Occupation­al Safety and Health Act and the Labour Act.

Under the same subsection, it is also noted that the wilful failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more contracts or subcontrac­ts will be considered as grounds for debarment or suspension.

Additional­ly, a contractor may be debarred or suspended based on the following grounds; any false informatio­n supplied in the process of submitting a bid or prequalifi­cation applicatio­n; collusion between the bidders or a bidder and a public official concerning the formulatio­n of any part of the bidding documents; coercion or connivance to interfere with the participat­ion of competing bidders; misconduct relating to the submission of bids involving fraud, corruption, collusion, coercion or price fixing, or in the implementa­tion of a procuremen­t contract such as intentiona­l or negligent billing irregulari­ties, submitting false or frivolous or exaggerate­d claims, documents or records, falsificat­ion of claims, documents and records. Contractor­s also convicted of a criminal offence, or subject to a civil judgment for commission of a criminal offence or fraud relating to obtaining or attempting to obtain, or performing a procuremen­t contract or subcontrac­t will also be eligible for debarment or suspension.

The draft document also stated that conviction of a crime related to business or profession­al activities, or other violation of law, as determined by a court of competent jurisdicti­on or an administra­tive proceeding, which in the opinion of the Public Procuremen­t Commission indicates that the supplier or contractor is unable to perform responsibl­y or which reflects a lack of integrity that could negatively impact or reflect upon Guyana, including but not limited to any of the offences listed in the Schedule of Offences will also be considered as grounds for debarment or suspension.

The document also states that a loss or suspension of a licence or the right to do business or practice a profession, the loss or suspension of which indicates dishonesty, a lack of integrity, or a failure or refusal to perform in accordance with the ethical standards of the business or profession in question will also be considered as grounds for debarment.

The supplier or contractor will be allowed to apply in writing to the Commission for a reduction in the duration of the debarment period, or its waiver.

According to the document, the supplier or contractor can apply for a reduction or waiver if there is newly discovered evidence or a documentab­le error in the findings of the PPC’s decision.

Additional­ly, if there is a bona fide change in ownership or control of the supplier or contractor, or other mitigating factors sufficient, in the judgement of the PPC, to remove the conditions giving rise to the conduct that led to the

debarment, a supplier or contractor would be able to apply for a reduction or waiver.

Mitigating

It also added that mitigating factors may include, without limitation, disciplina­ry actions against all persons responsibl­e for the acts giving rise to the debarment; remedial action designed to prevent a recurrence of the acts giving rise to debarment; or a determinat­ion by the Commission that the past conduct of the supplier or contractor does not indicate a pattern or history of similar acts.

However, it stated that the presence of any grounds for debarment does not mean that in every such case debarment is necessaril­y applied and that the seriousnes­s of the supplier or contractor’s acts or omissions, and any remedial measures or mitigating factors should be considered in making the debarment decision.

It also stated that the adjudicati­on of debarment and suspension by the Commission shall be on the basis of what it determines to be in the State’s interest and for the protection of the public interest.

When deciding whether to impose suspension or debarment when circumstan­ces justify such measures the Commission will consider several factors such as whether the supplier or contractor had establishe­d conduct standards and control systems in place at the time that the actions in question occurred; whether the supplier or contractor itself brought the actions in question to the attention of the relevant authoritie­s in a timely manner and conducted an internal investigat­ion, the results of which were brought to the attention of the relevant authoritie­s.

Additional­ly, the degree of cooperatio­n on the part of the supplier or contractor with investigat­ions and judicial or administra­tive proceeding­s carried out in connection with the conduct in question and the remedial measures that the supplier or contractor has implemente­d or has agreed to implement will be considered among other factors.

Apart from whether or not a procuring entity or other entity has brought an applicatio­n for debarment, the proposed regulation­s state that the PPC “may seek or receive from any source informatio­n or evidence concerning possible grounds under these Regulation­s for debarment or suspension of a supplier or contractor”.

The PPC, according to the draft regulation­s, could also extend debarment to affiliates of the supplier or contractor and any debarment or suspension order applies throughout the public procuremen­t system. (Dhanash Ramroop)

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana