Stabroek News

GECOM to tell president can’t meet poll deadline

-to launch house-to-house registrati­on -PPP calls for internatio­nal interventi­on

- By Thandeka Percival

By majority decisions that saw Chairman James Patterson use his casting vote, the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) has determined that it will advise President David Granger that the 90-day constituti­onal deadline for general elections cannot be met and will continue with its approved work plan for the year, including a national house-to-house registrati­on process. The decisions were based on advice received from the Ministry of Finance, which noted that the approved annual budget of a constituti­onal agency, such as GECOM, shall not be altered without the approval of the National Assembly. However, the opposition PPP yesterday challenged the advice and accused GECOM of toeing the government line and pushing the country closer to a constituti­onal crisis. As a result, it made a call for internatio­nal interventi­on. Following a statutory Commission meeting yesterday, PPP/C-nominated commission­er Robeson Benn told reporters that the Commission had voted to advise that GECOM cannot make the 90-day timeline as was establishe­d by the passage of a no-confidence vote against the government; that it needs money for elections; and that it would continue with its normal activities.

GECOM Public Relations Officer Yolanda Ward confirmed that following discussion­s on the advice received from the Ministry of Finance, the coalition-nominated commission­ers moved three motions, which were passed by a vote of 3 to 2 commission­ers on the 90day timeline, and 4 to 3 on the two other issues.

The vote on the motion pertaining to the deadline saw controvers­y over the recording of the vote of PPP/C-nominated commission­er Sase Gunraj. According to Ward, Gunraj did not indicate a yes or a no and was therefore recorded as having abstained. “On the second motion, he voted no and added ‘I said no for the first and I will say no again.’ However, [there was] no recording [of] him saying no to the first,” Ward explained.

Patterson cast his vote with the coalition commission­ers, resulting in a majority vote in favour of motions that President Granger be informed that based on advice the current appropriat­ion cannot be used for elections and that GECOM will continue with its approved work plan as decided before December 21st, 2018, when the vote on the noconfiden­ce motion was declared carried.

The advice from the Finance Ministry was contained in a letter sent to Chief Election Officer Keith Lowenfield by Finance Secretary Michael Joseph, who offered two areas of guidance. Joseph explained that Section 277(1) (b) of the constituti­on indicated that no moneys shall be withdrawn from the Consolidat­ed Fund, except where the issue of these monies has been authorised by an Appropriat­ion Act. He noted that in keeping with this provision, $5.37 billion was allocated to GECOM via Appropriat­ion Act No. 22 of 2018; $3.36 billion of this sum was allocated for house-tohouse registrati­on in 2019.

He further noted that the Fiscal Management and Accountabi­lity (Amendment) Act, No. 4 of 2015 in Section 80B (7) states that the annual budget of a constituti­onal agency approved by the National Assembly shall not be altered without the prior approval of the National Assembly and stressed the ministry cannot therefore alter the allocation of GECOM a constituti­onal agency. “The Office of the Finance Secretary has no locus standi in this matter,” Joseph concluded.

In a statement issued yesterday after the meeting, the PPP while not disagreein­g with Joseph’s conclusion that the ministry cannot interfere, disputed his interpreta­tion of Section 80B (7).

The party argued that Section 80B (8) makes clear that “the appropriat­ion of a constituti­onal agency approved by the National Assembly shall be disbursed as a lump sum” and contends that 80 B(7) does not prevent GECOM from utilising the lump sum allocated to it as it sees fit to carry out its functions.

The party has claimed that GECOM’s actions guarantee that Guyana is pushed towards a constituti­onal crisis and has called for internatio­nal interventi­on.

The PPP charged that the APNU+AFC coalition government-nominated Commission­ers and the unilateral­ly-appointed GECOM Chairman demonstrat­ed “their illogical willingnes­s to toe the government line, and in so doing have made the Constituti­on of Guyana subservien­t to the will of GECOM.”

It said GECOM is subservien­t to the Constituti­on whose provisions on the consequenc­e of a no-confidence vote are clear. “GECOM’s refusal to begin preparatio­ns for General and Regional Elections, after the December 21, 2018 vote on the no-confidence motion finds it complicit in frustratin­g the timeline for the constituti­onally due elections and there was no clear timeline on when that elections management authority could hold elections,” the party said, before adding that “there has been no effort to make a decision on what obtains in the short-term [and] no decision at the level of the Commission on when GECOM will be ready for elections.”

(Lowenfield has previously indicated that the GECOM Secretaria­t will need 148 days to run off an election.)

As a result, it concludes that “the time is opportune for internatio­nal action- as was needed in 1990 to ensure constituti­onal compliance.”

“As was the case then, Guyana is faced with a situation where GECOM is dominated by the PNCR. At risk are the democratic gains that have been made over the past two decades,” the party stressed before calling on the internatio­nal community and all Guyanese to condemn GECOM’s complicity “in the violation of the constituti­on.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana