Stabroek News

Trump administra­tion retreats on census citizenshi­p question

-

NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, (Reuters) - In a stinging defeat for President Donald Trump, his administra­tion ended its effort to add a citizenshi­p question to the 2020 U.S. census, saying that it will begin printing forms that do not include the contentiou­s query.

White House and Justice Department officials confirmed the decision, which came in the aftermath of a Supreme Court ruling on June 27 that faulted the administra­tion for its original attempt to add the question.

“I respect the Supreme Court but strongly disagree with its ruling regarding my decision to reinstate a citizenshi­p question on the 2020 census,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in a statement.

“The Census Bureau has started the process of printing the decennial questionna­ires without the question. My focus, and that of the bureau and the entire department, is to conduct a complete and accurate census,” Ross said.

Although the Supreme Court left open the possibilit­y of the administra­tion adding the question, there was little time left for the government to come up with a new rationale.

The government had said in court filings that it needed to finalize the details of the questionna­ire by the end of June.

After the ruling, Trump tweeted that he was consulting lawyers about delaying the census so that the question could be added.

Critics have called the citizenshi­p question a Republican ploy to scare immigrants into not taking part in the population count and engineer an undercount in Democratic-leaning areas with high immigrant and Latino population­s. That would benefit nonHispani­c whites and help Trump’s fellow Republican­s gain seats in the U.S. House of Representa­tives and state legislatur­es, the critics said.

“In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Trump administra­tion had no choice but to proceed with printing the 2020 census forms without a citizenshi­p question. Everyone in America counts in the census, and today’s decision means we all will,” said Dale Ho, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, which had fought the Trump administra­tion in court.

The Trump administra­tion had told the courts that its rationale for adding the question was to better enforce a law that protects the voting rights of racial minorities. Critics called that rationale a pretext, with the Supreme Court’s majority embracing that theory.

The court’s 5-4 ruling, which saw conservati­ve Chief Justice John Roberts join the court’s four liberals in the majority, ultimately proved decisive.

“While the Trump Administra­tion may have attempted to politicize the census and punish cities and states across the nation, justice prevailed, and the census will continue to remain a tool for obtaining an accurate count of our population,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James, who also challenged the question.

The census is used to allot seats in the U.S. House of Representa­tives and distribute some $800 billion in federal funds. Opponents have said the citizenshi­p question would instill fear in immigrant households that the informatio­n would be shared with law enforcemen­t, deterring them from taking part.

Citizenshi­p status has not been asked of all households since the 1950 census. Since then, it was included only on questionna­ires sent to a smaller subset of the population.

 ??  ?? Wilbur Ross
Wilbur Ross

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana