All files appeal e for ruling on nge to Cabinet

dnesday filed is intention to cision on his ’s resignation. cation asking other things,

ng a notice of lall’s applicaof the process he doctrine of Chief Justice ders asked for andlall to pay

med the Chief ue Nandlall’s onsidered and an Court of appeal court, ne 18th deciuential orders. h was filed on Ramkarran, bmits that the ailing to properpretation to, e Constitution of Guyana, which, he says, mandates the resignation of Cabinet, including the President, upon the defeat of government by a vote of the majority of the elected members of the National Assembly on a vote of confidence.

Ramkarran also argues that the Chief Justice erred in law by failing to properly, or at all, interpret and apply, and/or misapprehended the rationale of the CCJ in its decision of June 18th in the no-confidence motion appeals, which he posits could not supplant and supersede Article 106(6) of the Constitution.

Ramkarran also contends that the Chief Justice erred in law by failing to properly apply the doctrine of precedent to the issues before her, and by finding that the principle of constitutional supremacy and the provisions of Article 106(6) were subordinate to the doctrine of precedent.

Ramkarran is also asserting that the Chief Justice erred in law by finding that the proceedings before her, aimed at facilitating enforcement of a constitutional principle with implications for the rule of law, was an abuse of process.

Nandlall has pledged to pursue his application all the way to the CCJ if need be.