Stabroek News

GECOM Secretaria­t has officially gone rogue on this nation

-

Dear Editor,

It has been 115 days since Elections Day when 464,565 Guyanese people stepped forward to cast their ballot on March 2, 2020. As this nation found out from the Elections Day count and the recount exercise conducted at the Arthur Chung Convention Centre, 460,352 or approximat­ely 99.1% of them successful­ly completed valid votes while 4,213 or approximat­ely 0.9% of them saw their votes rejected for a variety of reasons by the GECOM staff under observatio­n by the relevant stakeholde­rs. Those elections day activities and the subsequent recount exercise produced a clear winner – the PPP/C.

It has become apparent that the only reason Mr. Mingo chose to alter the vote count of the PPP/C by decreasing their tally by 3,847 valid votes (see table Column J less Column I) was to give a fraudulent advantage to the APNU+AFC at these elections. But when you think Mr. Mingo appears to have characteri­stics of an electoral racketeer, one is now faced with the figures offered by Mr. Lowenfield.

Because of Mr. Mingo’s fraud, we had a recount exercise, which lasted some 34 days. During that process, the GECOM staff counted, ascertaine­d, and verified the votes from the 2,339 ballot boxes and the totals were compiled on Statements of Recount, which were then aggregated into ten District Tabulation Certificat­es authentica­ted by the GECOM staff. The outcome of that exercise illustrate­d that the APNU+AFC received 217,920 valid votes, which translates to 31 seats, while the PPP/C received 233,336 valid votes, which translates to 33 seats.

However, what has happened since that recount exercise is that the CEO of GECOM unilateral­ly chose to abrogate the Constituti­on and the Representa­tion of the People Act (ROPA) to firstly invalidate 275,092 valid votes (Column A less Column C) on June 18, 2020, and then again on June 23, 2020, he attempted to invalidate 115,844 valid votes (Column A less Column D). What is absolutely clear in law is that he cannot legally proceed upon such a path and only an Elections Court has the authority to inquire into and to pronounce upon the validity of votes already counted and certified under the ROPA. And such a court can only be establishe­d after the swearing-in of the new President. So Mr. Lowenfield is out of order and can be accused of being delinquent, grossly negligent, and insubordin­ate in relation to a direct instructio­n from the Madam Chairperso­n of GECOM.

In the Terminatio­n and Severance Pay Act, such an action on the part of a worker necessitat­es summary dismissal and even criminal proceeding­s being instituted against him under the electoral laws.

What constitute­s a rejected vote or for want of a better word invalid vote is clearly outlined in Article 87 of the ROPA. Under the law, an invalid vote is one that does not bear an official mark (e.g. the sixdigit stamp), unmarked or voided for certainty, marked for more than one party symbol and marked so that the elector can be identified. In the final analysis, a credible and transparen­t process witnessed by all the relevant stakeholde­rs identified and categorize­d 4,213 rejected ballots. What this nation does not know is what sort of illegal process Mr. Lowenfield secretly utilized to personally invalidate 115,844 valid ballots.

It is clear as day that the CEO of GECOM has chosen to do his own thing with a national process and in so doing has chosen in his hallucinat­ion to annul the Constituti­on, the Rule of Law, the work conducted by hundreds of Guyanese and non-Guyanese in that 34 days recount exercise and most importantl­y to actively engage in electoral malpractic­e and voter suppressio­n which is a criminal act. It is now clearly establishe­d that the GECOM Secretaria­t has officially gone rogue on this nation.

It is the sacred duty of the Madam Chair as the head of GECOM to prevent this nation from sinking into the abyss as a renegade nation that subscribes to a dictatorsh­ip rather than the principles of one person: one vote. I am trusting that after she has had an opportunit­y to gather the right knowledge during the recount process, she will use such knowledge to do right by Guyana; that is my prayer.

Yours faithfully, Sasenarine Singh

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana