Liza-1 environmental permit slashed from 20 to five years
-as citizens secure order from High Court in case against ExxonMobil
An Order issued earlier this month by the High Court of Guyana has slashed the term of ExxonMobil’s Liza-I environmental permit down to five years from 20.
The Order issued by Justice Jo-Ann Barlow in the case which had been brought by Dr Troy Thomas will be seen as a big win in favour of the upholding of environmental laws.
The Liza- 1 well has been producing oil since last December and a range of environmental issues remain unresolved.
According to a release yesterday from attorney, Melinda Janki, the permit will expire not in 2040, as ExxonMobil had planned and as per the initial permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA), but on 1st June 2022. This would allow outstanding environmental matters to be addressed.
The permit for the Liza2 well has also been reduced to five years. Liza2 has not begun to produce oil as yet.
The Order was issued in a case brought by Guyanese citizen, Dr. Thomas, who filed an action on the grounds that the 20+ year permit was issued in clear violation of Guyanese law, which expressly limits environmental permits to no more than five years. Following initial hearings in the case, the release said that the Environmental Protection Agency and Esso Exploration and Production Guyana Ltd (ExxonMobil’s subsidiary) settled the matter by agreeing to limit the permit to five years, as provided by law.
Lead Counsel in the case for Dr Thomas, Seenath Jairam SC said “Coming up against an oil and gas giant is always guaranteed to be a battle royal because of their deep pockets and long history in fossil fuels. While the EPA was ably represented, the law is pellucid regarding the duration of an environmental permit and for good reason. Our environment is our most precious resource and the law makers obviously intended that the EPA should have an opportunity at regular intervals to assess the suitability of an operator to continue operations, using international best practices. Dr. Troy Thomas is to be commended and complimented for his conscientiousness and public spiritedness in drawing attention to these environmental matters.”
According to Dr. Thomas, “The Guyanese people have loudly and repeatedly expressed their concern and anger at the danger that ExxonMobil’s oil production poses to Guyana’s environment and natural resources. I want people to know that we can and should take action to protect our national patrimony. We need to come together and safeguard the future for our children.”
The release noted that there has been widespread criticism of ExxonMobil’s environmental performance in Guyana.
“The earlier expiry of the permit means Esso will have to apply for another environmental permit in 2022, giving the public an opportunity to demand better terms for Guyana. The
Environmental Protection Act Cap 20:05 guarantees citizens’ rights to information and participation in the environmental impact assessments that are a precondition to environmental permits”, the release added..
According to Janki, “Successive governments have given away Guyana’s oil. We must not allow them to destroy Guyana’s rich marine resources as well. Guyana has strong environmental laws to protect the nation against dangerous oil and gas.”
She added that, “It is clear that the people cannot rely on the government or the so-called conservation organisations to protect Guyana’s rich biodiversity. Our future depends on individuals who are willing and patriotic enough to step forward as Dr. Thomas has done.”
The release said that the order made by the High Court also reduced the Liza II environmental permit to five years. That permit will expire in 2024 and not 2043 as in the initial permit issued by the EPA. The environmental permits for Liza I and Liza II have already been revised to conform to applicable law. The Payara environmental permit of 24th September 2020 was issued for five years in conformity with the law.
Dr Thomas was represented by Jairam SC, leading Janki and Pratesh Satram, attorneys- at- law. The EPA was represented by Anessa Chow, while Esso was represented by Andrew Pollard, SC.