Stabroek News

Chickens come home to roost: Anti-democracy and American politics

- By Anthony Bogues

Anthony Bogues is the Asa Messer Professor of Humanities and Critical Theory, Professor of Africana Studies, and Director of the Center of the Study of Slavery and Justice at Brown University

This is an edited version of an article that appeared in the South African based Mail and Guardian Thought Leader, January 13, 2021

January 6, 2021 was a historic day in American politics. One filled with historical juxtaposit­ions and paradoxes, in which an admixture of conservati­ve currents in American society and politics, ignited by four years of Trumpism, made a last-ditch attempt to stall and then overthrow the results of the November 2020 presidenti­al elections.

President Donald Trump’s “Save America” rally was transforme­d from a mass gathering into an insurgent mob led by the Proud Boys. Millions in the United States and around the world watched as the mob attempted to delay and then overturn the election as they attacked the Capitol building where Congress was in session to certify the results. As they broke through feeble police lines shouting slogans — that this was revolution and 1776 all over again — they paraded Trumpian flags and Nazi symbols; proclaimed that they were there to deal with democratic paedophile­s and to take back the country after election fraud.

All this was the culminatio­n of weeks of planning after Trump announced in December that there would be a “wild” demonstrat­ion to save America on January 6. As the mob overpowere­d those police officers who tried to resist them (in the initial stages of the attack on the (This is one of a series of weekly columns from Guyanese in the diaspora and others with an interest in issues related to Guyana and the Caribbean)

building, some police took selfies with the group and, it was reported, even opened some of the barriers to the grounds), a large confederat­e flag was carried around the halls of the building. It was the first time in American history that the flag of the slaveholdi­ng oligarchy had been inside the iconic building.

As the events in Washington DC unfolded, 600 miles away in the state of Georgia another historic event had happened. Georgia is a Southern state. It has a long history of racial slavery from about the 1750s onwards and was one of the states that triggered the American Civil War. The aftermath of the war was followed by a period of brutal racial segregatio­n. There had never been a black senator elected in the state. Atlanta, the capital city, was a bedrock of African American civil rights and political struggles. The city is home to the iconic Ebenezer Baptist Church where Dr Martin Luther King was pastor. In the 1970s it was the home of the African diasporic radical think tank, Institute of Black World led by Vincent Harding, a close ally of King’s.

The Senate races in the state during the November 2020 elections had been close and following the state electoral laws there was a required run off. One of the Democratic Party candidates was the African American Raphael Warnock, current pastor at Ebenezer, born in 1969 when two segregatio­n senators represente­d

Georgia. In an electoral race in which Stacey Abrams, now one of the most formidable black political electoral activists, along with groups such as the New Georgia Project and Black Voters Matter pulled out all the stops, Warnock became the first black senator from Georgia. In the other race, the Democratic Party candidate Jon Ossoff became the first Jewish senator representi­ng the state.

Warnock noted as he was declared the winner: “My 82-year-old mother, whose hands picked somebody else’s cotton, now picked her son for the Georgia senate seat.” The African American demand for political equality, combined with black organising, and embedded within a long tradition of Black Southern voter registrati­on drives readapted to the present circumstan­ces breached and opened up the American political representa­tive system.

The historical paradoxes of America were now open, alive and kicking. These two events, both rooted in American society and politics, but representi­ng two different histories and visions of the American Republic occurred almost simultaneo­usly. It was a sign that America is in deep crisis.

Since losing the November presidenti­al election all of Trump’s authoritar­ian politics have been on full display. Some commentato­rs opine that what we witnessed was the deep narcissism of the president and his unwillingn­ess to concede power. This argument is one of the least productive analyses, focusing on Trump’s personalit­y and not his politics. Of course the two cannot and should not be separated because personalit­ies particular­ly drive authoritar­ian politics.

In Trump’s case he has redefined American conservati­sm. No longer should we narrowly view American conservati­sm as primarily a mixture of ideas about limited federal government with enhanced regional state

power. No longer is conservati­sm just about large tax cuts for large corporatio­ns and the wealthiest; about curbs on labour unions and vocal support for the idea of individual­ism as the most important social and political value. And no more is American conservati­sm simply attached historical­ly to the ideas and practices of white supremacy. Today American conservati­sm is the bedrock of white supremacy; it is the ideologica­l home for anti-science ideas; it stands with a kind of Christian evangelism which proclaims that a significan­t section of Americans are evil and followers of Satan.

Reconfigur­ing American conservati­sm, Trump’s Republican Party has now embraced some of its most vocal supporters — leading figures of QAnon, the conspiracy theory group, as well as members of extreme-right militias. This alchemy of political and ideologica­l currents is what Trump tapped into and reworked as a political force which commentato­rs call the “base”. In the 2020 election, Trump garnered over 70-million voters, a higher number than he did in 2016. Trump’s current popularity is therefore not limited to a so-called base, but to a significan­t segment of the American population. There is a growing divide within America not between red states and blue states but rather about what America is and in what direction it should go.

The language of carnage which Trump deployed at his inaugurati­on, along with the slogan “Make America Great Again” consolidat­ed a political force among a significan­t section of America’s white population. It also created a mob. Some political theorists have described the mob as the “residue of all classes”. It is not the masses of people but a segment among whom there is political appetite for a strong leader. Within the mob the most important forms of political action are carried outside the boundaries of liberal democracy. They are the shock troops upon the political system and necessary to push it into an authoritar­ian mould.

After the election, Trump paid special attention to this mob. Although the mob is separate and sometimes distinctiv­e from the mass, both are connected ideologica­lly and so, for the over 70-million persons who voted for Trump whose faith in America was shattered before his 2016 victory and then restored after his win, this faith is now once again in jeopardy. Deeply enmeshed within the fantasies of white supremacy, there was confusion in both mob and mass. Trump and his allies had to explain the lost election and the stalling of the revolution he had promised or at least many of his followers thought was promised. “Election steal” became his battle cry, not so much because he was personally hurt to lose to Joe Biden but rather he found the slogan useful in keeping both the mob and the white masses who still had faith in him within the fold.

The immediate post-election period was therefore one of chaos in which the first objective was to find procedural ways for Trump to steal a win. Hence all the failed court cases. When this tactic failed there were pleas to members of the Republican Party. As Trump said to the Republican electoral officers in Georgia: “I just want 11 780 votes.”

Commentato­rs have noted that Trump is corrupt and that with so many court cases against him, what was driving him is a fear of possible prison time after the presidency. Although this may play a role, I suggest that the overriding political concern was what he considered to be the stalling of his authoritar­ian push and the required possible political moves to keep his movement going even during a Biden presidency. When the mass rally was being planned in December, various groups aligned to Trump had made it clear that there would be violence.

Both the mob and large segments of the American population feel that America is in a state of undeclared civil war. A poll taken in October 2020 showed that 61% of Americans felt that the country was on the verge of a civil war. By the end of October 2020 the rate of buying guns had risen dramatical­ly with 17-million guns purchased in 2020, the highest in 20 years.

What occurred in Washington on January 6 was therefore not unexpected. There is also a long history of successful­ly overturnin­g election results in American history, particular­ly when it involved black voters. Moreover, to recall the words of the African American commentato­r, Brent Staples, there is the “myth of American innocence”. It is a innocence in which voter suppressio­n against the African American population has been part of the electoral process; it is an innocence in which the wringing of hands about, “America is better than this” elides the ways in which the American state, once it proclaimed the Monroe Doctrine in 1823, routinely intervened in countries, overturnin­g many a democratic election with devastatin­g social and political consequenc­es. Just ask the Chilean people about the 1973 overthrow of the democratic­ally elected government of Salvador Allende. What was significan­t about the insurgency on Capitol Hill was that the violent attempts to overturn an election were not now occurring outside of the territoria­l boundaries of the US, but at the nerve centre of the American government — the chickens had come home to roost.

James Baldwin in 1965 noted that, “the great force of history comes from the fact that we carry it within us … and history is literally present in all that we do”. The force of history travels like sedimented deposits. When these deposits are not acknowledg­ed or not confronted, they rework themselves into our lives, shaping both our beliefs and the moments we live in. Part of the crisis of America is rooted in its myth of exceptiona­lism, as always a force for good; as a nation in which God’s handwork is made manifest. These enduring myths produced part of an ideologica­l configurat­ion which does not account for racial slavery and indigenous dispossess­ion, war and conquest as part of American history.

It means that in part the great divide which is now opening up in the country has been produced by the historical myths which have been a deep part of the dominant country’s narrative about itself.

These historical myths have now become fantasies that are at the foundation of many Americans’ beliefs about themselves and the country. They are the ballast of the ideology on which white supremacy is constructe­d. When the mob trashed the Capitol Building and its offices they were making it clear that for them

American liberal democracy did not have the capacity to renew the country, that what was required was the ditching of liberalism and a return to an imagined community based upon the historic ideas of white settler colonialis­m and patriarchy. Many of the mob called for a revolution, but this was a call for a revolution of the past. Nostalgia displaced the present and the future became an imagined past. In such a context reactionar­y violence becomes the order of the day.

The Biden/Harris presidency faces a long, rocky road where platitudes about healing will not repair the current divide. The political defeat of Trumpism is a necessary feature of progressiv­e American politics. I will end with reflection­s which come from Atlanta. Between 1956/57 King delivered two specific speeches: “The Birth of A New Age” and “The Birth of a New Nation”. In both, King called for America to transform itself and observed that nation’s divisions would not be overcome unless attention was paid to poverty, racial domination and general exploitati­on. In calling for a “Beloved Community” he was not asking for America to be an exception, but rather a community where radical forms of equality and freedom are present. To begin this journey America needs to confront its historical myths as well as create economic and social policies in which, as King said, “we will be lifted from the long night of poverty”.

Central to any form of progressiv­e American politics will be the black tradition of political action and thinking that King was part of. To a large degree the historical myths which drive conservati­ve American political ideas rest upon the material basis of racial slavery — antiblack racism. To defeat Trumpism also means to overturn white supremacy. In order to do that we might do well to call upon a tradition of political action and thinking of those who were enslaved and their long political and social struggle to create a different America.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana