Procurement commission could be seriously...

that its purpose “is to monitor public procurement to ensure .... fairness, equity, transparency, value for money and competition .... (and) that the procedures of public procurement are executed in accordance with the Laws of Guyana.” While the PPC has no enforcement authority, it could make recommendations to Parliament for corrective measures, including the application of sanctions. Two cases involving malfeasance highlight the significance of the PPC’s role in contract administration.

In 2016 the Minister of Public Infrastructure David Patterson awarded the “Demerara Harbour Bridge Feasibility Study” contract in the sum of $161.5 million to an unsolicited vendor, LievenseCSO Engi-neering Contracting BV. The first Expressions of Interest for that feasibility study did not result in any vendor being selected. The Ministry was required to re-tender the solicitation but did not do so. Instead, it accepted the unsolicited proposal from the Dutch Company, LievenseCSO, and awarded the contract accordingly. The PPC investigated the contract process and found that it was awarded in the contravention of the Pro-curement Act. Minister Patterson and Rawlston Adams (of the Demerara Harbour Bridge) were recently indicted for this aberration.

Another well-known case arose in 2017 when the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation (GPHC) awarded a contract to ANSA McAL for $605 million on a sole-source basis for the purchase of “emergency drugs.” The PPC investigated the contract award process and found breaches in the procurement rules. However, no one was sanctioned for those breaches.

The Clerk of the National Assembly has sent out invitations for nominations of qualified persons (to reflect the country’s diversity) to fill the five positions in the PPC. The closing date for nominations is May 17, 2021. As expected, the two major political parties would have a huge say in which candidates will be considered by the PAC and thence recommended for a 2/3 majority Parliamentary approval. Once approved by Parliament, the President would make the required appointments. In theory, the PPP/C could narrow its choice to 3 candidates, compared with 2 for the APNU+AFC. Notwithstanding, it would be a good move to include 1 or 2 members from the smaller parties, in keeping with the principle of inclusivity.

There is, however, the real prospect that the processing of these nominations could be held up because of the continued gridlock over the reluctance of David Patterson, the controversial PAC chair, to resign from that position because of allegations of impropriety. The convention is that the PAC should be chaired by a member of the opposition party. It seems that none of the opposition members in the PAC is willing to replace Patterson as the chair of PAC. For how long more this gridlock continues, is uncertain.

Given the rapid speed of the country’s development, I cannot stress enough the urgency and need for Parliament to appoint a new PPC. The failure so far to resolve the controversy over the PAC chair’s status has created a continuing vacuum in the procurement and contract oversight process (from November 2020 onwards). The current standoff will hurt the drive towards transparency and accountability (which both the PPP/C and APNU+AFC as well as smaller parties demand) and which are foundational principles of good governance. If this stalemate is allowed to continue, that could breed conditions favourable to corruption.