Stabroek News’ let

May I respond to Freddie K umn of April 26th, 2021, titled ` News cannot criticize the Govt. unfairly’.

While I read Mr. Rohee’s “l did not read the shortened ve Stabroek News, to which Fredd Rohee’s “long” letter could hav shorter (~40% of its original len serve its intended purpose, witho ing/understanding being lost. letter, allows more space for words and writers.

Here I quote from Freddie, “I ing this was barefaced denial of citizen to express him/herself national importance.”

Mr. Kissoon, Kaieteur Ne restriction on the length of your c evidenced by your own expre told us so). Is that because your no national importance? Is Clem letter, assisting you in your “war Kwayana, deemed to be of na tance?

Mr. Kissoon, considering that ing a senior position with the PPP ment, would you dare criticize affiliated papers? Obviously yo “attack” Kaieteur News. That lea News as your only prey.

The letters-section, of both P papers, seem to be dominated b ers. Stabroek News is dominate Mr. Kissoon, as a former teacher someone, on staff, claims they ha of years of experience, the te question. The question? Do you ber of years of experience or one rience, x-number of times? Now experience? Do your writings strate? You never seem to kno placement of the word, “only.” M you, Sir, you are an academic? Y serenade us with that fact.

May I educate and/or remind F letter, written by me, abou Airlines’ (CAL’s) failure to refu was printed only by Stabroek N my submissions to the four dailie latter point, in a subsequent lett sent me an email and called me hours of the appearance of my Stabroek News. It resulted in a full refund. That subsequent le