Stabroek News

Ten billion and counting

-

Coupled with the imminent arrival in Guyana’s waters of the second Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) platform which is projected to extract 220,000 barrels of oil daily, the announceme­nt by ExxonMobil that it has upped its estimate of the recoverabl­e resource in the Stabroek Block to ten billion has triggered ululations in the halls of the government, the private sector and the select others who have begun to benefit immensely from the petroleum industry. The news of the 10% upgrade in the number of barrels of oil equivalent and the heightened revenues that will accrue from the operations of a second FPSO has also evoked the usual recitation­s of how much GDP will climb by, how much money will be rolling into the country’s coffers and promises of a number of big-ticket projects.

There should, however, be a different type of examinatio­n, an introspect­ion of sorts as to how we can reconcile where we are today with what we have actually done to get here and the grave risks the country now faces. That Exxon’s subsidiary and its partners have been able to find oil is attributab­le to then President Janet Jagan’s decision in 1998 to authorise offshore acreage far in excess of what was legally permissibl­e for exploratio­n. The US oil major would then hang on for 17 years to the massive expanse it had been allocated before serious exploratio­n began, culminatin­g in the first of what would be over 20 significan­t hydrocarbo­n finds. Since its confirmati­on of its first big find in May 2015, Exxon and its partners and the Guyana Government have presided over swift well developmen­t which saw production beginning in December 2019 with another well set to produce next year.

Six years on, neither this government nor its predecesso­r can claim ownership of any positive action to sensibly secure the future of the country and its people as it relates to oil and gas. The 2015-2020 APNU+AFC administra­tion will go down in the country’s benighted history as having presided over the single biggest giveaway of the country’s patrimony by virtue of the shocking 2016 Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) that ExxonMobil and its partners managed to inveigle from it. Whereas former President Jagan could be faulted for an unduly generous pre-oil PSA, former President Granger’s government surrendere­d appalling terms in a postoil contract which now appear to be indelibly engraved as the current government has also apparently come under the spell of the US oil major. There is nothing else in APNU+AFC’s tenure of note in relation to oil and gas. It failed to deliver the regulatory body, the Petroleum Commission and was unable to have the Natural Resource Fund Act activated so that scaffoldin­g for the protection of oil revenues could lead to a

solid foundation. The governing PPP/C is exceedingl­y lucky to be presiding over an oil revenue bonanza. Having been voted out of office in 2015 after nearly 23 consecutiv­e years it bequeathed an economy in dire straits. Sugar was in terminal decline and no other major economic activity was on the horizon. Gold was as gold was. Extraction was occurring at varying levels in tandem with the internatio­nal price for the metal but returns to the economy were uneven and there was unrelentin­g smuggling as highlighte­d by the 2012 heist in Curacao of 476 pounds of Guyanese ore which to this day remains uninvestig­ated.

Having failed to deliver an economic lifeline to the country at the end of its 22-year tenure, the PPP/C has been ushered back into office and has taken to the role as if it could be credited with any part of the harvesting of oil resources. After a year in office, it has already failed as a steward of the country’s resources, to protect the environmen­t, manage its revenues and ensure climate change isn’t worsened.

Despite having good grounds to pursue a renegotiat­ion of the abominable 2016 PSA, President Ali’s government has found every opportunit­y to deflect when it should have sought internatio­nal support to underline the injustice that had been done to the country via the paltry royalty rate and the lack of protection such as ring-fencing of costs.

Of interest last week, it was reported that a draft Extractive Industries Transparen­cy Initiative (EITI) report has stated that the Democratic Republic of Congo should renegotiat­e its US$6 billion infrastruc­ture-for-minerals deal with Chinese investors.

The draft, seen by Reuters, described the deal that was first signed in 2008 as “unconscion­able” and urged Congo’s government to cancel an amendment signed secretly in 2017 that sped up payments to Chinese mining investors and slowed reimbursem­ents of investment in infrastruc­ture.

The final report is expected to be released this month. The deal was struck by the then Kabila administra­tion with two Chinese companies that have had extensive interactio­ns with Guyana: Sinohydro Corp and China Railway Group Limited.

What if Guyana were to ask EITI to review the terms of its 2016 deal with ExxonMobil and its partners? What is there to lose?

Aside from the PSA, the PPP/C government has failed to deliver on a regulatory framework for oil and gas and the management of revenues. Fourteen months after taking office, the Petroleum Commission is still to be establishe­d and the Natural Resource Fund which would set a spending framework for the economy is still to be introduced despite the broad understand­ing of how pivotal such legislatio­n is for a new oil producer particular­ly one prone to the Dutch disease. The administra­tion also continues to prevaricat­e on a local content law which it itself had committed to introduce.

On the environmen­tal front, the Ali administra­tion has made no substantia­l effort to expand Guyana’s ability to fight oil spills neither has it made it clear to ExxonMobil that it must be fully insured for this purpose and that any clean-up costs should be extracted from its share of profit oil. Far from protecting the environmen­t, the government has actually approved the decimation of protected mangroves to enable the creation of oil and gas shore bases that have begun to pollute the landscape and will undoubtedl­y scar the coastline for decades to come. Moreover, the statutory agency meant to protect the environmen­t, the EPA operates mostly as an adjunct to the runaway oil extraction plans as evidenced by its decisions not to require Environmen­tal Impact Assessment­s for key projects.

Despite the dire warnings each week from the UN and credible internatio­nal agencies and experts that more investment in fossil fuel extraction and combustion will imperil the planet, the government remains unmoved about requiring a depletion policy that will strike a balance between production and Guyana’s obligation to help ease the climate change crisis. To literally add fuel to the fire, the government is proceeding with a gas-to-energy project that has not been properly studied, reviewed, costed and weighed in the context of the climate burden. The public is still waiting for the Ali administra­tion to make a cogent case for this project.

The fanfare over the 10 billion barrels and counting should be tempered by the stark reality that 55 years of independen­ce has not delivered an economy to the people that could assure and sustain their developmen­t. This is entirely the fault of all of the government­s that have held office since 1966. The people now have to pin their hopes on oil fortuitous­ly discovered by a US oil major whose only interest is the bottom line and a governing party that has not historical­ly shown the ability to imaginativ­ely manage what is before it, diversify the economy and create jobs. The odds are not impressive.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana