Stabroek News

Extraction, Ecocide and Human Rights Abuses in the Caribbean

- By Malene Alleyne

Extractive industries are fueling ecocide and human rights abuses in the Caribbean. This will be the message at a landmark hearing of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on the Impact of Extractive Industries on Human Rights and Climate Change in the Caribbean, scheduled for October 26 at 14:00 EST.

The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated. While extraction in the Caribbean is nothing new, the past few years have seen an unpreceden­ted expansion in the nature and intensity of extraction in the region. This includes the recent launch of Guyana’s fossil fuels industry, an increase in oil exploratio­n across the region, and the expansion of mining on lands traditiona­lly inhabited by Indigenous, Afro-descendant and rural communitie­s.

Today, the cumulative environmen­tal degradatio­n caused by centuries of extraction presents an existentia­l threat to human rights and the environmen­t in at least five key ways:

First, extraction-related environmen­tal degradatio­n threatens the enjoyment of the right to a healthy environmen­t in the Caribbean. This right is enshrined in the Constituti­ons of some Caribbean states, such as Jamaica and Guyana, and was recently recognized by the UN Human Rights Council in a historic resolution, which received 43 votes in favour (including from The Bahamas), zero against, and four abstention­s (China, India, Japan, Russia).

Despite recognitio­n of the importance of a healthy environmen­t, states across the Caribbean are allowing companies in the extractive­s sector to destroy crucial ecosystems with little to no accountabi­lity. In Guyana, for example, the gold mining industry is causing deforestat­ion and the contaminat­ion of rivers from mercury use. In Jamaica, communitie­s have complained that the BauxiteAlu­mina Industry is causing noise and dust pollution, which results in respirator­y and other illnesses, and effluent spills that lead to massive fish kills, reduced water quality, and the disruption of the lives of communitie­s who rely on the river for domestic purposes. In Trinidad and Tobago, frequent oil spills pose a major threat to fisher communitie­s and marine ecology.

Second, the environmen­tal degradatio­n caused by extraction threatens a number of other economic, social and cultural rights that are dependent on a healthy environmen­t. These rights include the rights to food, water and cultural identity, which are enshrined in some Caribbean constituti­ons to varying degrees, as well as in the widely ratified Internatio­nal Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

In the case of Indigenous Peoples, “Tribal Peoples” such as the Maroons, and rural communitie­s, their economic, social and cultural rights are further reinforced by treaties and human rights documents, such as ILO Convention 169, the UN Declaratio­n on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and the Declaratio­n on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas. These documents seek to protect the special relationsh­ip that these communitie­s have with their territory in a way that guarantees their social, cultural and economic survival. These documents recognize a number of specific rights, including communal land rights and the right to free, prior and informed consent in the case of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples.

Contrary to this framework, extractive industries, given their harmful impacts on land and water resources, are disrupting traditiona­l ways of life while threatenin­g food and water security in the region. This is especially the case for Indigenous and Tribal Peoples and rural communitie­s whose close relationsh­ip with the environmen­t makes them particular­ly vulnerable to extraction-related environmen­tal damage. In Guyana, for example, gold mining takes place in the interior, which is predominan­tly inhabited by Indigenous communitie­s. Gold mining presents an existentia­l threat to their cultural identity, including though the destructio­n of their traditiona­l lands and the granting of mining concession­s without their free, prior and informed consent. This situation arises within a wider structural context in which the Government has failed to adequately protect their communal land rights. In Jamaica, the Bauxite-Alumina industry is gobbling up prime agricultur­al lands that are crucial for food security, while displacing rural communitie­s whose unique way of life is under existentia­l threat.

Third, extractive industries are shaping the climate vulnerabil­ity of the region. Dominant modes of extraction, especially fossil fuel extraction, are fueling the climate crisis. This crisis disproport­ionately impacts Caribbean islands given their vulnerabil­ity to sea level rise and catastroph­ic weather events of increasing intensity. Climate displaceme­nt is also a serious issue as seen, for example, in the aftermath of hurricane Dorian, which resulted in hundreds of thousands of displaceme­nts across several countries. Extractive industries are also simultaneo­usly underminin­g food and water security at a time when climate crisis threatens both.

Yet, Guyana has entered into fossil fuel production, raising concerns that this will significan­tly increase greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change and adversely affect the most vulnerable groups.

Fourth, extractive industries rely upon and reproduce racial and intersecti­onal forms of oppression that subjugate racialized and already vulnerable communitie­s, particular­ly women, Indigenous and Tribal peoples, and rural communitie­s. Ultimately, the stories of impact described above are not aberration­al. They are rooted in deeply held notions about how formerly colonized nations ought to exist in the world. From colonial times to the present, Caribbean nations have been relegated to sacrificia­l zones of extraction where they remain trapped in a vicious cycle of debt, dependency and environmen­tal degradatio­n.

Within this dynamic, Caribbean communitie­s bear the brunt of extraction-related damage, but reap the least benefits, which disproport­ionately accrue to shareholde­rs and consumers in the so-called developed world.

Fifth, extractive industries are underminin­g environmen­tal democracy, including with respect to the right to participat­e in environmen­tal decision-making, the right to access informatio­n, and the right to access an effective remedy. These principles of environmen­tal democracy were recently reinforced in the Regional Agreement on Access to Informatio­n, Public Participat­ion and Justice in Environmen­tal Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean (commonly known as the Escazú Agreement), which has been signed and ratified by a number of Caribbean countries. Contrary to these principles,

Government­s across the Caribbean are pushing through extractive projects by systematic­ally excluding affected communitie­s from participat­ion, access to informatio­n and access to remedy.

There is an urgent need for rights-based, earth-centered alternativ­es for post-colonial developmen­t in the region. Human rights bodies, such as the IACHR, can help to advance these alternativ­es by promoting human rights standards that empower affected communitie­s to take action in defense of their environmen­t and livelihood­s against extraction-related environmen­tal degradatio­n.

The upcoming IACHR hearing will provide an opportunit­y for Caribbean organizati­ons and activists to call upon the IACHR to take concrete action on extractive industries in the region. The regional hearing was requested by Malene Alleyne, human rights lawyer and

Founder of Freedom Imaginarie­s, and Esther Figueroa, environmen­tal filmmaker. The delegation will be the most diverse to appear before the IACHR from the Caribbean. In addition to Alleyne and Figueroa, the delegation includes: Immaculata Casimero (Wapichan Women’s Movement - Guyana), Samuel Nesner (Kolektif Jistis Min - Haiti), Gary Aboud (Fishermen and Friends of the Sea - Trinidad and Tobago), Diane ChristianS­immons (Cocorite Fishing Associatio­n - Trinidad and Tobago), Janette Bulkan (University of British Columbia - Guyana), and Kirk Murray (Fire Chief - North Abaco, The Bahamas).

The hearing will be broadcast via Zoom (https://cidhorg.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_SHyMdmj2SN­Sp0H AoOmw-7g) and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/CIDH.OEA/live)

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana