Social media may have winded its way through our cultural life as the basis for anti-intellectualism
The revolution is digitized. Are we a nation that has become dumb on smart gadgets? Are we face-bookers that sit for hours staring at a screen where facetime, inbox, outbox, dropbox, and miles of sockets and dockets, have immersed us in a new vocabulary? There are those that believe we’re hooked up, addicted and uneducated, and standing in corners glued to smart screens, as we invite internet apnea. There can be no doubt that social media has resulted in disorientation and a reluctance to explore the treasure-trove of literacy. In 1963, Professor Richard Hofstadter provided the theoretical basis for anti-intellectualism. He argued that, ‘the strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is as good as your knowledge.’
The National Endowment for the Arts reported in 1982 that the number of adults that read for pleasure was 82 per cent, but by 2002 this figure had dropped to 67 per cent. The proportion of 17 years-old read that nothing, unless required by school, doubled between 1984 and 2004. There are other disturbing revelations. Many students did not fare better with the citizenship tests, as only 2.8 per cent of 8th graders were able to pass it. It is little wonder that a number of educators feel that the educational skills of the previous generation will not be surpassed by current performance in schools. Many educators feel that students in today’s educational institutions will not surpass, equal, or even approach those of their parents. When asked to name a country that begins with the letter ‘U’ some seventh-graders replied, ‘Europe, Utah or Utopia.’ The currency of the England was given as the ‘pesos, the dollar, I don’t know, or the Queen’s money.’ The name of America’s neighbour, south of the border, was given as, ‘Disney World, Texas or Montana.’
The point from these examples is that the seeds of dumbing-down were sown in the seventies. They slowly worked their way into the classrooms through government’s control of the school system, and the lack of choice that brings competition. In the 2009 Journal of Science, it was found that Chinese students outperformed their American counterparts in science, based on test scores in four American universities, and three Chinese universities. The Americans averaged 50 percent, while the Chinese scored 90 per cent. What has been the role of the internet on college students? Information shapes one’s thought process, but as Nicholas Carr argues, ‘the Net seems to be chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation.’ The surfeit of information, at a click, is not without its drawbacks. We browse and skip rather than bury our minds into the beauty of the prose. We hop and skim, and read abstracts, rather than decipher the essence of the long passages. The malleable mind wanders and cognitive development becomes obscure. Enter Sergey Brin, from Google, who wants our brains to be replaced by artificial intelligence, which is a scary thought.
As far as college students are concerned, a report in Applied Cognitive Psychology found that they spent five hours a day on their smart phones that has created a cascade of substandard performances. The conclusion was that more phone use led to poorer solving problem skills. Where do we go from here? Social media has given a voice to many, the minorities that clamor for change, and who have been able to organize, to effect revolutions. The Arab Spring is one such example. The search engines have presented a world library, at the fingertips, and have given us information to transform societies. But social media is uncontrolled and unregulated. It has lumped people into categories, of right and left, conservative and liberals, and centrists; progressives and patriots, racists and traitors. Social media has also allowed a few to drive and dictate the agenda, and almost everyone to be an authority, and a critic. A child is cyber-bullied every fifteen minutes and little is done to stop it. There are those that predict social media will get worse, as viral piles on viral, the planet of the apps increases, and people don’t know what to believe anymore. Institutions, known for their credibility, are damaged. The leak in the US Supreme Court, Roe v Wade, has added to the confusion.
Haidt argues that the answer lies in the creation of voluntary associations to ‘fix local problems.’ But this is not enough. Power lies in education. It lies in the schools, and colleges, where sound curricula can accommodate the digital embrace, to reflect and enhance learning. As the social media engines grind away, the simple stories continue to hold the truth.