Stabroek News

GFF and Sports Management Inc

-

Last week, the Guyana Football Federation was throwing its weight around again, as seems to be its wont as of late. On Wednesday, the GFF declared that Sports Management Inc (SMI), an entity which organises grassroots football tournament­s, was persona non grata, for arranging an ‘unsanction­ed’ event, the Magnum ‘Unfinished Business’ Street Futsal Tournament at the National Park, on Saturday, 18th June. This announceme­nt came on the heels of the suspension of 13 players and one official on 19th June for participat­ing in the said affair.

The follies and shortcomin­gs of the GFF over the last five years have been well documented in this column, but with every passing incident, the collective shallownes­s of mindset and basic ineptitude just continues to sink further and further. On 20th March, members of the GFF secretaria­t and some of their friends, led by the GFF president, effectivel­y terminated the Lenny Shuffler Senior Women’s Volleyball Championsh­ips at the Clifford Anderson Sports Hall (CASH) just as the finals were about to commence, in order that they enjoy an indoor ‘kick-around’ (An act of bullyism, SN editorial 30th March, 2022). Prior to that event, it was the blatant violation of Covid-19 protocols at the finals of the GFF/Kashif and Shanghai Futsal Championsh­ip on 8th January, at the same venue, when in the presence of Prime Minister Mark Phillips (Head of the National Covid-19 Task Force), Minister of Public Works Juan Edghill and Minister of Culture, Youth and Sport (MCYS) Charles Ramson Jr, the organising officials stood by idly as the facility was packed beyond normal capacity.

One’s initial instinctiv­e response is to immediatel­y dismiss this episode as just another example of the GFF’s arrogance and high and mighty approach to the grassroots footballer­s. However, in delving down this rabbit hole one discovers that there is a little more than meets the eye here.

The participat­ing teams in this ‘unsanction­ed’ tournament were community/street teams, not clubs or associatio­ns affiliated to the GFF. In an exclusive interview with this publicatio­n, SMI principal, Edison Jefford said that he had not received any formal notice of the entity’s suspension, but had been made aware of it through his friends in the football fraternity. The GFF stated that he had not submitted all the requisite documentat­ion – clearances from the Guyana Fire Service, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency, along with the police permit for staging the event – an allegation that Mr Jefford denies. He stated that nothing could be further from the truth; following due process he

had collected all the paperwork by Friday and had duly submitted same to the GFF which never responded.

Likewise, he never received any notificati­on that the event was unsanction­ed but was aware the GFF had actually made an attempt to inform other parties that another organisati­on was hosting the tournament. Other disturbing revelation­s from SMI included the allegation that the original applicatio­n in May for renting the CASH venue had been denied on the grounds that the facility had been slated for capital works, specifical­ly the installati­on of bucket seats and was unavailabl­e. In the interim no renovation was performed and several sports discipline­s were granted use of the building including basketball, badminton, and volleyball. Permission to use the CASH facility has to be sought from the National Sports Commission which is chaired by Kashif Muhammad, a principal of the Kashif and Shanghai (K&S) group, which is associated with organising football tournament­s. In fact, K&S was the only entity during the Covid-19 pandemic permitted to stage tournament­s, which it did in conjunctio­n with the GFF. Is there a conflict of interest here?

Why has the GFF resorted to the draconian measure of designatin­g SMI with persona non grata status? Mr Jefford explained in the interview that he sought to follow the protocols which other organisati­ons that have staged similar events in recent times have not done, but suffered no repercussi­ons. The important question here is, does the GFF have jurisdicti­on over street or community organised football? FIFA, the GFF’s governing body, runs associatio­n football.

On 17th December, 2017, after the GFF Extraordin­ary Congress to pass the 2016 Financial Statements, the GFF President declared, “We presented the 2018 schedule for competitio­ns which shows the consolidat­ion of football activities that will bring as you would notice in our most recent press release greater regulation of every aspect of football, including street football in particular.” He added that they were going “to levy three per cent against the total prize monies or the total gate income, whichever is higher of the two,” and since there is no gate, then the GFF intended to dip directly into the pockets of these players from the low income areas. The GFF has cast its greedy eyes on the poor man’s game for quite a while now.

At the end of the day it’s always the players who receive the short end of the stick. Why suspend the players who are under no legal obligation to the GFF? Hubert Pedro, a Golden Jaguar internatio­nal and one of the suspended players, sums up the fiasco in the following words, “They want to take control of the format, they didn’t build this format. This was built by the players, and they want to control everything, and that is wrong. Football players need to take a stance, they believe that we are stupid. How can they ban us when we are not contracted to them, they don’t own us…. This will force players to gravitate more to the street format because they are not doing anything for us. They are simply trying to bully players.”

On the surface, this shambles just appears to be another hopeless example of the GFF bullying the players but when taken into account with all that’s been happening over the last three months, one has to sit up and take notice, and pose the question; what is the real end game objective here?

Viewed in a broader context, is this mess just an isolated minor tantrum? Or is this all part of the process of controllin­g and manipulati­ng the masses? Collective­ly, these sleight of hand diversions have very serious long-term implicatio­ns for all Guyanese across-the-board. Total control in any circumstan­ces does not augur well for the future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana