Stabroek News

APA has taken extreme position on carbon credits which is not based on fact

-

Dear Editor,

I write to publicly state my alarm in learning that the Amerindian Peoples Associatio­n (APA) has filed a “formal complaint” to the Architectu­re for REDD+ Transactio­ns (ART) Secretaria­t against Guyana’s National Forest Carbon Programme – a key aspect of the LCDS 2030.

I have since seen the 18-page letter with appendices dated March 8, 2023, addressed to the ART Secretaria­t and copied to several internatio­nal institutio­ns including the United States Department of State and the Norwegian Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI), among others. It is glaring that no person or agency in Guyana was copied; not even the National Toshaos Council (NTC), the legislated representa­tive of the indigenous peoples of Guyana.

Further, as Chairman of the NTC, I categorica­lly state that our Council. Including its executive, was not informed, much less consulted on the APA’s intention to file a complaint purportedl­y on behalf of our indigenous peoples, and we were not given even the courtesy of notificati­on that the ART Secretaria­t was being contacted and a complaint registered.

The APA goes as far as to recommend to the ART Secretaria­t that “the credits issued to Guyana that have not yet been purchased be frozen and suspended, and that no further credits be issued” until the APA’s demands are met. This is presumptuo­us, totally unacceptab­le and does not represent the wishes of our indigenous people.

Editor, it is outrageous that the APA, a local NGO with a handful of members in two administra­tive regions, and with no legislated authority to represent indigenous peoples and local communitie­s (IPLCs) in Guyana or anywhere for that matter, could be brazen enough to take such a position.

It is incredible that one of the main accusation­s the APA levels against the Government of Guyana is the alleged absence of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) regarding issues of our people. Yet, the same APA appoints itself as spokesman of our people and is making demands and even challengin­g the integrity of Government and internatio­nal institutio­ns while falsely claiming to be our representa­tives.

The APA has not informed us of their intentions; they did not provide us with any informatio­n of their complaint or demands; we were not consulted and therefore, we have not and could not give our consent to their letter and complaint to the ART Secretaria­t. In other words, the APA is guilty of the accusation­s they have unjustifia­bly leveled against the Government of Guyana. The APA does not honour or respect FPIC.

Editor, the APA is a member of the national multistake­holder steering committee (MSSC) which takes decisions and oversees the LCDS 2030 implementa­tion including the forest carbon credit programme. I have confirmed that the Committee was not informed of this move by the APA and I am sure that the Guyana Organizati­on of Indigenous Peoples (GOIP), The Amerindian Action Movement of Guyana (TAAMOG), Amerindian Developmen­t Foundation (ADF) and the Indi-genous Peoples Commission (IPC), all of whom are representa­tives of our IPLCs and are MSSC members, were not consulted or informed by the APA either.

Dear Editor,

To what purpose was ‘Shell’s’ P R company being used by the Government, as is being adverted to in one of the dailies (SN April 14)? Was the hiring of this company even

I call upon my fellow Toshaos and other community leaders to call out the APA on their offensive actions.

I urge the ART Secretaria­t, our internatio­nal partners, and all Guyanese to see through this veil of deception.

I am at a loss as to why the APA would take such an extreme position which is not based on fact. However, I am almost certain that their views and opinions do not represent me, my village, or the totality of 242 villages, communitie­s and satellites of our Guyanese indigenous sisters and brothers.

Editor, our indigenous leaders are currently actively engaged in developing plans and projects in consultati­on with their residents to determine developmen­t programmes for their respective communitie­s. There is a hive of activity in all communitie­s across our country. This is a process of self determinat­ion regarding how the funds earned and already disbursed to our village bank accounts, under the carbon credit scheme would benefit our people, their livelihood­s, and future generation­s.

The APA must not be allowed to deprive our villages, our communitie­s, our people of the developmen­t funds we need to pursue the vision of our people.

Yours sincerely,

Derrick John

Toshao, Moraikobai Village, Region 5

Chairman, National Toshaos Council made public? Further, is there a connect between its being hired by one and terminated by the other? Sincerely,

Shamshun Mohamed

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana