Stabroek News

To his critics, Jagan’s life should be examined in its totality

- Sincerely, Gary Girdhari

Karl Marx’s Poverty of Philosophy. These readings introduced me to reason and logic in analyzing society – in a naïve way. Fast forward >>>

After completing post-graduate studies, I returned to UG and lectured in Biology. My teachers became my academic collaborat­ors. I learned from experience­d ones like Dr. Neville Trotz, Dr. George Walcott,

Father Campayne, Dr. Clive Thomas, Father Malcolm Rodriguez, Dr. Harold Lutchman – and there were others. I also hung out with the technician­s, gardeners, drivers – socially. I believe that I performed my duties rather well. My job was secure and I strove to work hard and save a little from the relatively poor salary at UG. I wanted the best for my family and never aped the yuppie lifestyle. Fast forward a little.

Sometime in 1976 – 1977, I was invited to the meet with Dr. Cheddi B. Jagan at his home. I knocked on the door, and it was Mrs. Janet Jagan who asked me in. The house that they lived in was in Bel Air. It was small and plain ordinary, probably a two-bedroom. Dr. Jagan and I shook hands and he pointed to a chair. “Have a seat, Comrade.” Mrs. Jagan went out of sight and returned with a glass of beverage. Dr. Jagan came to the point, “Comrade Girdhari (he knew my name), I like to ask you to do something for us – me and the Party. Form a small group of intellectu­als and do research for us. Like a think tank. If we need informatio­n on any matter, we can call on you and your group can provide such informatio­n upon our request.” (to paraphrase)

I listened carefully and simply nodded in acquiescen­ce. The meeting was over. I should point out that nothing came out of this – no think tank. But the visit was a life education for me. The Jagan’s house was rather small compared to other houses in Bel Air and Prashad Nagar, and moreso, for people of such national and internatio­nal stature and repute. In addition, I observed that the furnishing­s were simple – not outlandish or extravagan­t – yet, with a touch of class where less is more! I saw books and mementos. This taught me and reminded me of the simple life that I was accustomed to in my growing-up years – not by choice, but because of lack of resources for the basic needs for a comfortabl­e and decent life.

To me, Dr. Jagan’s life was not complex. Why? Because his life synchroniz­es with mine in many ways. He did not wear shoes till he was 12; I did not wear shoes until I was maybe 16, on and off, until 17 when I started teaching. When he moved from Ankerville, Port Mourant, he did “many chores such as washing the Elder’s car, carrying his lunch on his bicycle, going to market, and cutting grass for his goats... I particular­ly resented the latter. Cutting and fetching grass in the country was one thing; doing so in Georgetown as a Queen’s College student was quite another. Georgetown middle class snobbery had so influenced me that I soon found some pretext to persuade my father to find me other lodgings.” (From George Lamming, York University on March 2, 2002, p. 3) This “particular­ly irked me about my position in this household: firstly, I was singled out to go occasional­ly to the market; secondly, I had to sleep on the floor, although there was an empty room with a vacant bed.”

Those who criticize and chastise Cheddi Jagan are wrong. We should understand Jagan in totality – not cherrypick, nor admonish, but examine his life holistical­ly. His early experience­s impacted his views on society in Guyana. His experience­s at Howard University, in Chicago and New York City, observing firsthand the poverty, inequality and indignitie­s of poor whites, and people of colour (especially the blacks in the ghettos) informed a mindset that steered his life – not as a dentist – but as a fighter for the underdog. During his tenure as a politician in power, he accomplish­ed many things within a few years, e.g., unions (sawmill and GAWU), housing schemes (in the sugar belt), drainage and irrigation projects (Tapacuma and Black Bush), All Age Schools throughout the country and University of Guyana, Medex and cottage hospitals nationwide with resident doctors.

Cheddi Jagan finds common grounds with Liberation Theology and even the Bible which states clearly that “Believers [should] share their possession­s”. He had a full grasp of society, having been “schooled” by history (of feudalism and the power dynamics) and by logic and reasoning, described otherwise as dialectic materialis­m. He also finds commonalit­ies with freedom fighters (Kwame Nkhrumah, Jomo Kenyatta, Julius Nyerere and others) during an era of anticoloni­al and anti-imperial struggles, jump-started by India’s Independen­ce.

Cheddi was mis-understood by the U.S. and Britain; or it was all deliberate to maintain the status quo of Western hegemony, bearing in mind the enduring policy of the Monroe Doctrine and McCarthyis­m. After the damage was done, the United States acknowledg­ed the wrong through the voice of Arthur Schlesinge­r Jr., who stated that the U.S. “had plotted against Cheddi Jagan, [and] apologized to Jagan for what he called “a great injustice” he and his Kennedy colleagues had helped to perpetrate.

(https://www.thenation.com/article/sch lesinger-nation/). Read also Schlesinge­r’s “A Thousand Days”. Fast forward >>> Several years ago, I read the ‘Minimalist’ in the NY Times. This synced with my belief system. I wrote an article entitled “The Essence of Moral Living” which encapsulat­es my broad outlook…. Today I will describe myself as a minimalist – a lifestyle inculcated in my childhood and witnessed in my meeting with Dr. Cheddi Jagan in 1976.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Guyana