Further belligerent salvoes can be expected from Venezuela
I refer to SN’s editorial ‘Irrationality’ published in the edition of 24.3.24.
It is not so much a case of irrationality on the part of Venezuela but more a combination of electioneering, desperation, weakness and timing.
Less that twenty-four hours after the visit of the CIA head to Guyana, Venezuela announced the creation of a ‘new state’ in Essequibo. This appears to be the set modus operandi of Venezuela as established in the light of remarks made by General Laura Richardson of the US Southern Command, the visit of a British patrol vessel here as well as the visit by David Rutley, the Parliamentary UnderSecretary of State for Americas and Caribbean, as a gesture of solidarity.
Further belligerent salvoes and ‘irrational’ moves can be expected from across the border with the impending visits to Guyana by a former US President, a former British Prime Minister and the French Foreign Minister when they land on our shores.
Observers have easily concluded that Venezuela is playing ‘Follow Pattern’ in the light of Russia’s annexation of Crimea and Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands having observed and concluded that the international community’s ‘bark is worse than its bite’ and that the UN Security Council is in a state of rigor-mortis is so far as territorial disputes based on national security interests, real or imagined are concerned.
Irrationality is a specific weakness in human cognition, the habits and processes that lead people to false conclusions. In other words, people believing what they want or what they are predisposed to believe. This is precisely the case with Venezuela’s latest move.
By acting in this irrational manner the Maduro administration appears to have convinced itself that it has good reasons to believe in what is highly improbable but which in essence is nothing more than an absurdity.
President Maduro appears to be on the hunt for an elusive objective; his dilemma lay in not accepting the truth about Essequibo and to whom the territory legally and historically belongs, that is proving difficult for him accept, thus by simply trusting his beliefs he has become trapped in misapprehending what the world holds as a ‘March Of Folly.’
Clearly, Maduro’s obsession with the Essequibo has impacted his susceptibility to a host of fallacies resulting in calculative errors that are to be found in his administration being blind to hemispheric realpolitik. In the circumstances, his irrationality should not escape our rational scrutiny
Yours faithfully,
Clement J. Rohee