Construction of border wall between the Dominican Republic and Haiti morally reprehensible

I am writing to express my profound dismay regarding the recent decision by the Dominican Republic Chambers of Commerce to invite former US President Bill Clinton as the keynote speaker at The United Caribbean Chamber Forum. This decision reeks of disingenuity and hypocrisy, especially considering the Dominican Republic’s controversial plans to accelerate the construction of a 250-mile border wall with Haiti.

Bill Clinton, a figure renowned for his advocacy of global cooperation, human rights, and diplomacy, stands in stark contrast to the actions being taken by the Dominican Republic government. The decision to erect a border wall not only sends a message of exclusion and hostility but also undermines the principles of unity and solidarity that should be central to any Caribbean forum.

The invitation extended to Bill Clinton appears to be a thinly veiled attempt to deflect criticism and portray an image of international cooperation, while simultaneously pursuing policies that exacerbate tensions and perpetuate division. It is hypocritical for the Dominican Republic Chambers of Commerce to seek the endorsement of a statesman who has consistently championed inclusive policies and promoted dialogue, while simultaneously endorsing actions that run counter to these values.

Furthermore, the construction of a border wall between the Dominican Republic and Haiti is not only morally reprehensible but also shortsighted and counterproductive. Such barriers serve only to deepen existing divisions, exacerbate socioeconomic disparities, and hinder the free flow of ideas, goods, and people. Instead of building walls, we should be working together to build bridges of understanding and cooperation.

I urge the Dominican Republic Chambers of Commerce to reconsider their decision and to align their actions with the principles of unity, inclusivity, and mutual respect. Inviting Bill Clinton as the keynote speaker while simultaneously pursuing divisive policies sends a conflicting message that undermines the credibility of this forum and detracts from its potential to foster genuine collaboration and progress in the Caribbean region.