Public weighs in on giant telescope design

NANJING — The Chinese public has developed an interest in the development of the world’s largest telescope, as scientific disagreements about its design broke into cyberspace.

Chen Jiansheng, a senior astronomer at Peking University, sent a mass email to China’s leading astronomers last week opposing the existing design of the telescope. Two academicians, Cui Xiangqun, the telescope’s chief engineer, and Su Dingquang, an astronomer at Nanjing University, jointly responded on social media in defense of the original plan.

The public has now been drawn into the scientific infrastructure development process, and is picking sides.

The 12-meter telescope, known as the Large Optical/ Infrared Telescope, was included on the list of megascience facilities to be built during the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-20) in March. The four-mirror plan was approved by the engineering team in July.

The government has required construction to begin by the end of 2018. Any delays or controversies over its design would risk missing that target.

The project’s engineering team, under Cui at the Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics and Technology, is in favor of the ambitious four mirror plan. On the other side, many astronomers and astrophiles have called it too risky and want a simpler and more universal three-mirror plan.

“Though I have no understanding about the mirrors, I believe involving the public in the future of our country’s scientific endeavors is progress,” said Zhao Hang, an amateur stargazer.

Nearly 200 reports on the debate had been posted on news sites as of the weekend, including on many of China’s most prestigious media outlets, with some reports exceed design ing 100,000 online views.

“Fundamental science has a relatively high threshold. But scientific findings have obviously drawn much more attention in recent years, which demonstrates rising scientific literacy among the public,” said Cai Yifu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

“It is also the job of scientists to explain and promote their work to the public,” Cai said, citing as one example the world’s highest altitude gravitational wave telescopes in Tibet, which welcomed public opinion from to construction.

China’s young astronomers, who don’t usually have a say in State-level megascience projects like this, jointly released an open letter on social media that read: “As the main future users of the next-generation telescope, we sincerely and earnestly hope the debate over its design can be open and transparent.”

The letter has received about 130 signatures in favor of the three-mirror plan.

Last week, overseas Chinese scientists also joined the debate. Shen Yue, an assistant professor at the University of Illinois, said the generally accepted international method is to organize an expert panel to review all plans and gradually reach a consensus after several rounds of discussion.

“I hope both sides will find a solution soon based on mutual understanding and sufficient debate,” a user named Zhang Dong commented online. “After all, none of us would like to see China miss this crucial opportunity in its development of astronomy.”

It is also the job of scientists to explain and promote their work to the public.” Cai Yifu, physicist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences