China Daily

No closure from ‘final’ MH370 report by Malaysia

- By KARL WILSON in Sydney karlwilson@chinadaily­apac.com

The release of the Malaysian government’s final report on the disappeara­nce of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has done little to bring closure to the relatives and friends of the 239 crew members and passengers (most of whom were Chinese) that disappeare­d on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing over four years ago.

Despite the detailed report of more than 800 pages, investigat­ors were unable to say with any certainty what caused the disappeara­nce of MH370.

The report said evidence points to an “incontrove­rtible conclusion” — that it was under manual control, and that it was deliberate­ly flown out into the Indian Ocean. But who was at the controls of the Boeing 777 will never be known, at least until the wreckage is found.

“The team is unable to determine the real cause for disappeara­nce of MH370,” Kok Soo Chon, head of the safety investigat­ion team, told reporters on Monday in Kuala Lumpur.

“We are unable to determine with any certainty the reasons that the aircraft diverted from its filed flight plan route,” he said.

According to Geoffrey Thomas, editor-in-chief of AirlineRat­ings.com and a leading aviation expert, the report “is not final for the relatives, the aviation industry or the conspiracy theorists”.

“It is just the beginning of a new phase of the search into the most bizarre disappeara­nce of modern history,” he said.

Thomas, who has been covering aviation for decades, said it was a “great shame that all the Malaysian authoritie­s responsibl­e for the aviation industry in March 2014 were not as thorough when MH370 disappeare­d”.

“Fighters should have been scrambled to follow MH370 as has been done many times around the world — including Australia — when a plane goes ‘silent’. ”

Australian Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack said in a statement on Monday that the disappeara­nce was “an unpreceden­ted event”.

“The Australian government appreciate­s that, having not located the missing aircraft, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusion­s about what happened to MH370,” he said.

“As such, I am aware this report does not provide the answers the family and friends of the 239 people on board were seeking,” the statement said.

A relative of a passenger

aboard missing airliner MH370 reads the Malaysian government’s investigat­ive report in Malaysia on Monday. SADIQ ASYRAF / REUTERS

Australian Danica Weeks, whose husband Paul was among the 239 people on board the aircraft, told Australia’s ABC News she had been given just 48 hours’ notice of the report’s release.

Weeks waved goodbye to her husband as he boarded the flight from Perth to Beijing via Kuala Lumpur on March 8, 2014.

It has become the biggest aviation mystery involving a Boeing 777. A privately funded search for the missing plane was called off in May.

It was the second major search after Australia, China and Malaysia ended a fruitless $200 million search across an area of 120,000 square kilometers last year.

Three wing fragments that washed up on Indian Ocean coasts are so far the only confirmed traces of the Boeing 777 aircraft since it disappeare­d.

AirlineRat­ings.com’s Thomas said, “The report raises the issue of the captain’s flight simulator, but in stark contrast to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau report, it backs away from any connection to the events of MH370.”

The Malaysian report says that the Royal Malaysian Police Forensic Report concluded “that there were no unusual activities other than game-related flight simulation­s”.

However, the ATSB had earlier said that “six weeks before the flight, the pilot in command had used his simulator to fly a route, initially similar to part of the route flown by MH370 up the Strait of Malacca, with a left-hand turn and track into the southern Indian Ocean”.

“The Malaysian report does, however, point the finger at human interventi­on,” Thomas said.

It says the aircraft was under manual control, not autopilot, when it made the various turns and that it could not be establishe­d whether the aircraft was flown by anyone other than the pilots.

The Malaysians also agree with the ATSB that at the end of the flight, the plane was in a dive with no one in control, with the aircraft’s flaps retracted rather than a pilotcontr­olled soft ditching on the ocean as suggested by some.

It also states that the discovery that some debris found was almost certainly from the interior of MH370 indicated a violent impact.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong