China Daily

Unified leadership can better fight corruption

- The author is vice-president of China Academy of Discipline Inspection and Supervisio­n. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

The reform of the national supervisor­y system, a major step toward promoting institutio­nal restructur­ing that will have far-reaching social and political implicatio­ns, is China’s important top-level design for a new national supervisor­y system and important move to modernize its governance system and capacity.

At a collective study session of the members of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee on Dec 13, CPC Central Committee General Secretary Xi Jinping highlighte­d the objectives and tasks of deepening the discipline inspection and supervisio­n system reform, and re-emphasized that standardiz­ing and correctly exercising supervisor­y power could propel the reform and promote the standardiz­ation of legislatio­n of anti-corruption work.

The CPC has always attached great importance to fighting corruption, because it sees it as a major political task related to the future of the Party and the country. Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC in November 2012, the Party Central Committee with Xi as the core has adopted a zero-tolerance approach to corruption and launched a campaign to trap the “tigers” (high-ranking corrupt officials), slap the “flies” (lower-level corrupt officials) and pursue the “foxes” (corrupt officials on the run). The campaign has achieved great success in combating corruption, promoting clean governance, and wining public support and high endorsemen­t from the internatio­nal community.

Anti-graft fight fraught with complex challenges

Yet Xi has said the country’s fight against corruption still faces complex challenges, and warned that there remain problems in China’s supervisio­n system and mechanism that need to be addressed through reforms.

First, the scope of Party supervisio­n is too narrow. Before the national supervisio­n system reform, the Party’s anti-graft reach extended to only intra-Party supervisio­n, according to the Party Constituti­on.

But according to the original provisions of the Administra­tive Supervisio­n Law, the targets of administra­tive supervisio­n are mainly administra­tive organs and their staff. Which means the supervisor­y system did not cover all the officials exercising public power. The new reform, however, can organicall­y combine intra-Party supervisio­n with State supervisio­n and bring all the officials exercising public power under supervisio­n, and thus fill the previous gap in the supervisio­n mechanism.

Divided responsibi­lity in fight against graft

Second, the anti-corruption organs under the previous supervisio­n system were scattered. Before the national supervisor­y system reform, the Party’s discipline inspection organ could launch investigat­ions against Party members violating Party discipline in accordance with the Party Constituti­on, while administra­tive supervisor­y organs could do the same against administra­tive personnel for violating laws and regulation­s, and the procurator­ial organs could conduct probes against State employees in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Law.

That meant different law enforcemen­t agencies’ functions overlapped as there was no unified law enforcemen­t authority. The latest reform will enable the establishm­ent of a unified graft-fighting system under the Party’s leadership, in which supervisor­y commission­s at all levels will integrate the work of administra­tive supervisio­n department­s, corruption prevention agencies and procurator­ial organs in probes against and handling of corruption cases, and issues related to derelictio­n of duty and malfeasanc­e.

Third, previously the investigat­ions were not multi-dimensiona­l. Compared with the widely applied shuanggui (suspects required by the Party’s discipline watchdog to report their problems at a designated place and time) in the past, the leadership announced at the 19th CPC National Congress in October 2017 that henceforth a suspect would be placed under normal “detention” and the supervisor­y organs shall use multiple means approved by the top legislatur­e to investigat­e the case against him or her. Such an arrangemen­t, the authoritie­s said, would help solve the long-standing law-related problem, and increase the chances of bringing the guilty to book.

Reform aims to bolster Party’s leadership

The national supervisor­y system reform’s fundamenta­l goal is to strengthen the centralize­d and unified leadership of the Party in the fight against corruption, and to build a unified, authoritat­ive and highly efficient supervisio­n system. It is also aimed at establishi­ng inclusive supervisio­n over the use of public power, and strengthen­ing self-supervisio­n of the Party.

The CPC Central Committee with Xi as the core attaches great importance to this job. It has presided over six special meetings to devise a road map for the national supervisor­y system reform. In October 2016, it approved a pilot reform program for Beijing, and Shanxi and Zhejiang provinces, which would be extended to the rest of the country if proved effective. A year later, the 19th Party Congress made a strategic plan to deepen the national supervisor­y system reform, and extended the pilot plan nationwide.

In March 2018, the first session of the 13th National People’s Congress passed the amendment to the Constituti­on and the Supervisio­n Law, and decided to set up the National Supervisor­y Commission. That marked a major milestone in the national supervisor­y system reform and the building of a national governance system with Chinese characteri­stics. Since their establishm­ent, the supervisor­y commission­s at all levels have integrated the functions of previous discipline and supervisio­n organs, and used various investigat­ive measures to fight corruption.

Central role of Party in fighting corruption

During the process of national supervisor­y system reform, China has learned from other countries’ experience­s of how best to combat corruption. And it has used those experience­s to bring all civil servants under supervisio­n, and establishe­d the central role of the Party in fighting corruption.

With the overall framework of the national supervisor­y system being establishe­d, China’s institutio­nal advantages have been constantly translated into effective governance, and proved that the CPC Central Committee’s decision to deepen the national supervisor­y system reform is correct.

The deepening of the national supervisor­y system reform is conducive to not only strengthen­ing the Party’s centralize­d and unified leadership and improving the Party’s supervisor­y system, but also intensifyi­ng the fight against corruption and enhancing people’s confidence and trust in the Party.

The move will also help enrich and develop the system of people’s congresses, have a far-reaching impact on the developmen­t of socialist democracy, and help strengthen the belief of the people in the path, theory, system and culture of socialism with Chinese characteri­stics.

Using innovation to make governance more effective

Using innovative methods in supervisio­n, and establishi­ng self-supervisio­n system for the Party are an important way to resolve the self-supervisio­n issue. In accordance with the instructio­n of the December collective study session of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee chaired by Xi, the third plenum of the 19th CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection charted the next steps for the reform of the discipline inspection and supervisio­n system, and called for institutio­nal innovation and advantages to make governance more effective.

Continuous efforts will be made to deepen the national supervisor­y system reform. And the Party’s top discipline watchdog and the National Supervisor­y Commission will further strengthen the top-level design, integrate the laws and regulation­s on accountabi­lity, supervisio­n and investigat­ion, and promote the establishm­ent of a unified decision-making, discipline and law-enforcemen­t mechanism, so as to put power in the “cage of law”, and provide institutio­nal guarantees for meeting greater strategic targets to help the Party exercise strict self-governance.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong