China Daily

• Editorial

-

With the ongoing second session of the 13th National People’s Congress reviewing the draft law on foreign investment over the weekend — the third review in three months — the draft is highly likely to sail through legislativ­e scrutiny and be signed into law after being submitted to the top legislatur­e for review on Friday.

Once approved, which seems most likely because most of the controvers­ial issues have been addressed, the draft foreign investment law will become what many believe to be the most important legislatio­n in China since it entered the World Trade Organizati­on in 2001. It will replace the three existing laws regulating foreign-invested entities now — the Chinese-foreign equity joint ventures law, Chinese-foreign cooperativ­e joint ventures law, and wholly foreign-owned enterprise­s law.

More importantl­y, the draft law represents the “fundamenta­l change” in the country’s approach to foreign investment administra­tion, which will greatly increase “openness, transparen­cy and predictabi­lity”.

But despite the fact that the draft law is, first and foremost, part of the measures to deepen reform and opening-up in order to improve China’s overall business environmen­t, some assume Beijing is rushing the draft through the NPC to help trade negotiatio­ns with Washington. Such assumption­s are groundless, to say the least, because discussion­s on adjusting the existing regulatory statutes had begun around 2013. Plus, a 170-article draft foreign investment law was published for public review way back in January 2015.

Moreover, the much streamline­d 39-article draft in 2018 is nothing short of revolution­ary, as it is aimed at a strategic turn in the country’s approach to foreign investment. Beijing’s concept of openness is no longer limited to offering favorable treatments to businesses, including foreign businesses. It focuses more on providing an environmen­t conducive to rules-based fair competitio­n.

Since the 1980s, “access examinatio­n and approval plus preferenti­al treatments” has been the standard formula for overseas investment administra­tion. Article 4 of the draft foreign investment law stipulates: “The State adopts a regulatory regime of pre-access national treatments plus negative list for foreign-invested enterprise­s.” Which means the case-by-case examinatio­n and approval for setting up a foreigninv­ested enterprise in China will be abandoned.

Under the draft law, “all State policies supporting enterprise developmen­t apply equally to foreign-invested enterprise­s”, “the State guarantees foreign-invested enterprise­s fairly participat­e in government procuremen­t activities”, and foreign companies will be eligible to conduct fundraisin­g by openly issuing stocks and bonds in accordance with the law.

With the legal hedges between domestic and overseas companies gone, the longstandi­ng contradict­ions between the three existing statutes and the country’s Company Law are also likely to be a thing of the past.

The draft law also addresses such concerns as expropriat­ion and compensati­on, intellectu­al property rights protection and technology transfer. But it is its embrace of the principle of competitiv­e neutrality that sits at the core of the revolution­ary changes.

The new law, therefore, is expected to not only help attract more foreign investment, but also facilitate structural reforms necessary for the country’s economic upgrading. So foreign enterprise­s and investors should rest assured that it will usher in a new era when foreign and Chinese companies can compete on a truly equal footing in the Chinese market.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong