China Daily

FAA’s ‘self-certificat­ion’ criticized after 737 crash

- By SCOTT REEVES in New York and WANG KEJU in Beijing Contact the writers at scottreeve­s@chinadaily­usa.com.

The US aircraft industry is moving toward using its own employees to certify the safety of aircraft, a departure from prior practices at the Federal Aviation Administra­tion that could endanger air safety, said the former chairman of the National Transporta­tion Safety Board.

James Hall expressed his views in an opinion piece in The New York Times, one day after the FAA’s decision on Wednesday to ground Boeing’s MAX 8 and MAX 9 planes following fatal crashes of the craft in Indonesia in October and in Ethiopia on March 10.

China was the first to ground all Boeing 737 Max 8 airplanes, followed by other countries.

“We took immediate action to ground the Boeing 737 MAX 8 jets and will resume the commercial operation after investigat­ion to ensure flight safety. It indeed shows the responsibi­lity for protecting people’s safety and the principle of zero tolerance on safety hazards in the civil aviation industry,” said Feng Zhenglin, head of the Civil Aviation Administra­tion of China.

The successive crashes happening to Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft indicate the safety hazards behind the jets, he added.

China has the largest number of 737 Max aircraft in operation, so it’s reasonable and justified to temporaril­y ground the operation of the jets for the sake of people’s safety before Boeing announces what caused the crashes and discovers all possible loopholes, said Li Xiaojin, a professor of aviation economics at the Civil Aviation University in Tianjin,

Hall wrote that under a 2005 change in the FAA’s regulatory responsibi­lity, “rather than naming and supervisin­g its own ‘designated airworthin­ess representa­tive’, the agency decided to allow Boeing and other manufactur­ers who qualified under the revised procedures to select their own employees to certify the safety of their aircraft”.

“In justifying this change, the agency said at the time that it would save the aviation industry about $25 billion from 2006 to 2015. Therefore, the manufactur­er is providing oversight of itself. This is a worrying move toward industry self-certificat­ion,” he said.

Hall served as chairman of the US National Transporta­tion Safety Board from 1994 to 2001. The board investigat­es plane crashes, certain types of highway crashes, ship and marine accidents, pipeline incidents and railroad accidents. The FAA regulates civil aviation and runs the nation’s air traffic control system.

Some analysts don’t fully agree with Hall’s critique. They said that much of the technology in contempora­ry aircraft has outstrippe­d the ability of regulators to keep up with advancemen­ts. They point out that the FAA’s practice of relying on industry insiders is no different from the US Food and Drug Administra­tion’s reliance on experts from the companies it regulates, state bar associatio­ns overseeing the conduct of attorneys and taking disciplina­ry action when needed, or a local police department investigat­ing an officer-involved shooting.

“There is nothing insidious here,” said Robert Mann, president of R.W. Mann & Co airline consultant­s in Port Washington, New York. “This is a widespread practice and occurs in other industries. The designated representa­tive system has been used for years and is also used in Europe. Innovation often outpaces the regulators.”

Separate issue

Mann said Boeing could have done a better job sharing informatio­n about how to over-ride the anti-stall system on Boeing 737 MAX planes, but that is a separate issue from the use of representa­tives from aircraft builders to review the safety of new aircraft.

Sharing informatio­n to resolve problems is the key to making air travel safe, Mann said.

Scott Hamilton, managing director of Leeham Co, an aviation consultanc­y in Seattle, took a less sanguine view of the issue and said the FAA has been underfunde­d for years.

“The trouble is any time you have the applicant doing its own inspection­s, you risk the absence of an outside viewpoint,” Hamilton told China Daily. “But it’s not in the interest of the applicant — Boeing or whoever — to approve something that’s unsafe and will harm or kill people.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong