China Daily

Move against TikTok lays bare Washington’s predatory designs

- Li Yang The author is a writer with China Daily. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

On Oct 8, the US administra­tion began the appeals process of a recent federal court ruling suspending the administra­tion’s ban on downloads of short- video sharing app TikTok, saying it would provide an opening statement before Oct 16 to which TikTok has to reply by Nov 6, and it would respond to TikTok’s reply by Nov 12.

In the order issued on Sept 27 hours before the download ban was to take effect, Judge Carl Nichols of the US district court for the District of Columbia, Washington, only imposed preliminar­y injunction on the TikTok download ban. The ruling did not extend to the restrictio­ns on technologi­cal and business arrangemen­ts that are necessary for the proper functionin­g of TikTok from Nov 12.

Just like some of its previous moves, the US Commerce Department had a lot of time to impose the ban on the app — on grounds of “national security” — but it issued the order at such a time when TikTok had less than one day to respond. And convenient­ly, the US administra­tion has said it would respond to TikTok’s reply by Nov 12, the day when the other ban on the use of the app is to come into effect, leaving the company no time to fight its case if the administra­tion wins the retrial.

As the claims of the plaintiffs indicate, the “unbounded and unlimited trade war” the US administra­tion started against China is not only self- harming, but also a blatant abuse of its power.

Besides, the court’s ruling late last month prompted the administra­tion to put “maximum pressure” on the Chinese company in a bid to force it to enter into a partnershi­p with Oracle and/ or Walmart. It has been deemed unfair by even many third parties. Because it would give the US companies not only considerab­le stakes in a proposed joint venture, but also overwhelmi­ng power to control the future executive board. More importantl­y the US companies would get access to TikTok’s original source codes and algorithms.

That is “Americaniz­ation” of a Chinese company that owns innovative technologi­es by force, which the Chinese government will not tolerate. The US is using its high- tech prowess and muscle power to continue its technologi­cal and commercial dominance in the world market.

It is the technologi­cal success of companies such as ByteDance ( owner of TikTok), Huawei and the Semiconduc­tor Manufactur­ing Internatio­nal Corporatio­n that has prompted the US administra­tion to either launch direct attacks against them or encourage US companies to acquire their US business. This should be a warning to countries that have been silent onlookers to the US’ thuggery that their companies could meet the same fate.

Late last month about 3,500 US companies sued the US administra­tion for illegally imposing punitive tariffs on imports from China. Which makes it clear that the administra­tion has been collecting the additional tariffs from US companies and US consumers, the very parties it claims to be serving. As the claims of the plaintiffs indicate, the “unbounded and unlimited trade war” the US administra­tion started against China is not only self- harming, but also a blatant abuse of its power.

The US’ smash and grab of foreign companies, with Alston of France being another case in point, will ultimately take a toll on the US economy, as it undermines not only the business environmen­t in the country, but also affects the global supply and value chains.

When the foundation of the world order becomes weak, those sitting on top will likely be the first to fall. The US constantly projects itself as the champion of fair competitio­n and market economy, yet its move against TikTok, once again, shows it is a ruthless predator on the constant lookout for prey.

The US’ moves threaten to reverse the process of economic globalizat­ion and the internatio­nal division of labor because, taking a leaf out of the US book of trickery, more and more countries are trying to allure their companies back home from China, or shift operations to a third country. The fact that major economies are retracting into their shells fearing the US is out to seize their lifeline industries is a disturbing trend.

While the world faces many common challenges that call for all countries to join hands to overcome, it is absurd that, thanks to one country’s actions, they are being compelled to re- dig their foxholes to seek shelter and security to not only fight alone, but unfortunat­ely fight against one another.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong