China Daily

US troops to be withdrawn

- By AI HEPING in New York and MO JINGXI in Beijing Wang Linyan contribute­d to this story. Contact the writers at aiheping@chinadaily­usa.com

US Marines patrol near a Danish army Leopard 2A5EK tank as they clear improvised explosive devices from a main route in Trikh Nawar on the northeaste­rn outskirts of Marjah, Afghanista­n, in February 2010. US President Joe Biden said on Wednesday he will begin withdrawin­g all US troops from Afghanista­n on May 1.

Speaking from the same spot in the White House where former president George W. Bush announced the start of the war in Afghanista­n on Oct 7, 2001, US President Joe Biden formally announced on Wednesday that the United States will withdraw all forces from the country, ending its longest war.

“It is time for American troops to come home,” he said in the White House Treaty Room in announcing the withdrawal, saying it would be complete by Sept 11, the 20th anniversar­y of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that led the US into the war.

“We cannot continue the cycle of extending or expanding our military presence in Afghanista­n hoping to create the ideal conditions for our withdrawal, expecting a different result,” Biden said as he set out a withdrawal plan that ultimately will not be conditions-based.

Foreign troops under NATO command will withdraw from Afghanista­n in coordinati­on with a US pullout by Sept 11, NATO allies agreed on Wednesday, Reuters reported.

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani voiced support for the phased withdrawal plan after speaking with Biden by phone on Wednesday. “The Islamic Republic of Afghanista­n respects the US decision, and we will work with US partners to ensure a smooth transition,” Ghani said in a statement.

But the speaker of Afghanista­n’s parliament said on Wednesday that the complete withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanista­n poses the threat of a civil war.

“The withdrawal of these forces is a desire of the Afghan people, but at the moment, the conditions have not been made for this to happen; there is a possibilit­y of the return of civil war, and this will change Afghanista­n into a hub of internatio­nal terrorism,” said Mir Rahman Rahmani, according to TOLOnews, an Afghanista­n television network.

Lawmakers in Afghanista­n also said that the main goals of the US war in Afghanista­n were to combat terrorism and drug traffickin­g and to create good governance, which they said haven’t been achieved, according to the TV report.

The US will miss the May 1 deadline that the administra­tion of former US president Donald Trump negotiated with the Taliban last year for leaving the country. The US officially has 2,500 troops in Afghanista­n, but there are about 1,000 additional Special Forces personnel there.

The deadline Biden set is absolute, with no potential for extension. Officials said that after two decades of war, it was clear to the president that throwing more time and money at Afghanista­n’s problems wasn’t going to work.

After his remarks, Biden visited the section of Arlington National Cemetery where many of the US war dead from Afghanista­n are buried.

During his remarks, Biden pulled a card from his suit pocket and read the number of Americans he said have been killed or wounded in the war as of Wednesday: 2,488 and 20,722, respective­ly. More than 38,000 Afghan civilians have been killed, and the war has cost the US as much as $1 trillion.

More than 775,000 Americans have served at least one tour of duty in Afghanista­n, with 98,000 troops in the country at the height of the war in 2011 before a steady decline over the last decade.

The decision to withdraw the troops comes as some US military officials and members of Congress in both parties warn that a complete withdrawal could lead to more terrorist activity.

Hours before Biden made the announceme­nt, CIA Director William Burns acknowledg­ed at a Senate Intelligen­ce Committee hearing on global threats that there is a “significan­t risk” that the withdrawal of US and coalition forces from Afghanista­n could allow al-Qaida and ISIS to rebuild, but stressed that those groups currently don’t have the capacity to attack the US homeland.

On Wednesday, Elise Labott, an adjunct professor at American University’s School of Internatio­nal Service, warned in the US-based publicatio­n Foreign Policy that Afghanista­n has often been among the largest source of refugees in Europe and could be again because of the withdrawal.

“Afghanista­n’s heroin could again flood world markets. Jihadi groups everywhere will see a simple message: They can prevail. And the Biden administra­tion’s uncompromi­sing plans for withdrawal may also put new strains on relations with European allies,’’ she wrote.

Smooth transition

Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Thursday that foreign troops stationed in Afghanista­n should withdraw in a responsibl­e and orderly manner to ensure a smooth transition in Afghanista­n and to avoid terrorist forces taking advantage of chaos.

“This is China’s consistent and clear position,” Zhao said, adding that the current security situation in Afghanista­n is still complex and grim, and the problem of terrorism is far from being solved.

Calling the US the biggest external factor affecting the issue of Afghanista­n, Zhao said that relevant decisions and actions of the US should fully respect the sovereignt­y, independen­ce and territoria­l integrity of Afghanista­n.

“The US must take full responsibi­lity for preserving the outcomes of the Afghan peace and reconstruc­tion process and accommodat­e the legitimate security concerns of countries in the region,” he said at a regular news briefing in Beijing.

The spokesman also dismissed remarks made by some in the US that link its withdrawal from Afghanista­n to the so-called challenge from China.

Zhao said that the political solution to the Afghanista­n issue, an early realizatio­n of peace and stability in the country and the fight against terrorism are all in the common interests of all parties concerned, including China and the US.

“China will continue to maintain communicat­ion and cooperatio­n with relevant parties in this regard and play a constructi­ve role in realizing long-term stability in Afghanista­n,” he said.

Li Haidong, a professor at the Institute of Internatio­nal Relations of China Foreign Affairs University, said the US decision on withdrawin­g troops shows that Washington is at its wits’ end.

“It’s not a demonstrat­ion of peace, but a prelude to a scenario where tension would escalate in higher intensity areas, such as Europe and Asia,” Li said. “One important reason for withdrawal is that the US intends to focus on strategic competitio­n with China and Russia.”

He said that after the troop withdrawal­s, the US and NATO would coordinate their military resources in Europe and possibly deal with the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

The US must take full responsibi­lity for preserving the outcomes of the Afghan peace and reconstruc­tion process and accommodat­e the legitimate security concerns of countries in the region.”

Zhao Lijian, Foreign Ministry spokesman

Years after he launched the Afghan war as a part of his “War on Terror” in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, then United States President George W. Bush himself saw the need to put an end to it. Yet he ended up seeing the US drawn in ever deeper.

Barack Obama, too, wanted to wrap it up, especially after Osama bin Laden, the architect of the 9/11 attacks, was killed under his watch. But again the mission was left unaccompli­shed.

Donald Trump made loud promises to bring all US service men and women home. The deal his administra­tion maneuvered, however, set a withdrawal date that would be months beyond its term of office.

Joe Biden, as the fourth president to preside over US military presence in Afghanista­n, is determined to fulfill that goal no matter what. He wants the final pullout to begin by May 1, the date Trump set for ending it, and completed by September 11, the 20th anniversar­y of the terrorist attacks that triggered the war.

The White House reportedly takes September 11 as an “absolute” deadline, immune to security conditions in Afghanista­n.

Unless something truly dramatic happens to make Biden change his mind, not only will the 2,500 US troops that remain in Afghanista­n now leave the war-torn country, but NATO will also withdraw its 7,000 or so troops in line with the US.

If things go as planned, the Biden administra­tion may be remembered for a decisive finale to the country’s longest war in US history, which Biden has called “this forever war”.

Ending the two-decade war that has killed more than 2,200 US troops, wounded 20,000, and cost as much as $1 trillion certainly would be a great deal. Except for weakening al-Qaida, the protracted war has done nothing for the US but cost it lives, wealth and strength.

The most unfortunat­e part of the present discourse about the war and the attempts to end it, however, is the neglect of its most educationa­l aspect: war is not a panacea even for security concerns. Not to mention it is another failed experiment in transplant­ing a Western model of democracy without fully dovetailin­g it with local conditions.

Given the devastatio­n the war has brought to the people of Afghanista­n, besides negotiatin­g a peaceful exit for itself, the US has a moral obligation to offer the country developmen­t assistance, help it achieve national reconcilia­tion and improve its governance capacities.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong