China Daily

The world must pressure Japan to change decision on Fukushima water

- Guo Rui The author is deputy director at the Institute of National Developmen­t and Security Studies at Jilin University. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

Japan announced on Tuesday that it would discharge radioactiv­e water from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the sea, claiming it was the best option despite strong opposition from both home and abroad, especially from neighborin­g countries including China and the Republic of Korea.

Last month, Japan told Rafael Mariano Grossi, director general of the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency, that it hoped the United Nations nuclear watchdog would conduct a safety review and endorse its decision.

Later, in response to the concerns raised by other countries, Grossi informed Wang Qun, China’s envoy to the UN and other internatio­nal organizati­ons in Vienna, that the IAEA would assess as well as monitor the dumping of the radioactiv­e water in an impartial, objective and scientific manner.

Wang, on his part, said China, as a neighbor of Japan, along with all other stakeholde­r countries should be involved in the agency’s work, because the contaminat­ed water from Fukushima posed a serious threat to not only the marine environmen­t but also the people in neighborin­g countries, especially the fishing communitie­s.

Japan’s plan to release more than 1 million tons of highly contaminat­ed water into the ocean, to put it simply, is irresponsi­ble. The internatio­nal community, especially neighborin­g countries such as China and the ROK, have raised objections against the decision, urging the Japanese government to fulfill not only its national but also internatio­nal obligation­s.

Despite the domestic and internatio­nal opposition, however, the Japanese government has decided to go ahead with the plan, endangerin­g the marine environmen­t and biodiversi­ty and, in the process, revealing its selfish and hypocritic­al side.

An earlier German study that consimulat­ions showed that if contaminat­ed water from the Fukushima site were released into the sea, the radioactiv­e materials could spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within 57 days, and would be found in all the oceans in a decade.

And although countries such as the United States and Australia will also become victims of the contaminat­ion, they have chosen to ignore the facts and maintain a studied silence over the Japanese government’s evidently hazardous decision.

In fact, the US administra­tion is clear that dischargin­g such a huge volume of radioactiv­e water into the sea, even after treating and filtering it, will damage the global marine environmen­t.

Incidental­ly, the Yoshihide Suga administra­tion announced the decision before Suga’s visit to the US, where he is supposed to meet with US President Joe Biden on Friday, which suggests the plan enjoys the support of the US administra­tion. Due to the double standard the Biden administra­tion seems to be using on this specific environmen­tal issue, the US, which has always claimed to attach great importance — except during the Donald Trump presidency — to environmen­tal issues, might end up shooting itself in the foot.

The truth is, Japan has other options to deal with the contaminat­ed water, including further treatment and undergroun­d reservoirs. Besides, as experts have suggested, to store the radioactiv­e water in special water storage tanks is the best solution so far.

Yet the Japanese government has chosen the cheapest but extremely harmful way to deal with the radioactiv­e water, which could threaten the health of people across the world.

Given these facts, the world cannot afford to turn a blind eye to Japan’s dangerous plan. The right thing for the internatio­nal community to do is to pressure Japan to reverse its decision, in order to protect the global marine environmen­t and human health.

Given these facts, the world cannot afford to turn a blind eye to Japan’s dangerous plan.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Hong Kong