Bike India

KTM 1290 Super Duke R Our man Roland heads out on the most potent Duke ever from Mattighoff­en

‘Put simply, the harder you ride this subtly restyled but comprehens­ively updated KTM, the more you’re likely to value its developmen­t’

- Story: Roland Brown Photograph­y: Marco Campelli and Sebas Romero

When testing a bike on track i usually need a session or two to get both machine and rider dialled in before really feeling the benefit of any updates. but not at Portimao astride the updated 1290 super duke r. ktM’s lead rider had pulled in after a couple of warm-up laps, leaving clear tarmac ahead. and by the time i’d dispatched the main straight with the wind tugging at my neck, clamped on the ultra-potent brembo stylema calipers and then carved through the Portuguese circuit’s opening series of right-hand turns, it was clear that this super duke was far more at home here than its predecesso­r would have been. the bike’s stability under hard braking was impressive, as was the precision with which it flicked into each turn in response to light pressure on the handlebar. and under accelerati­on the difference was even more obvious. as the ktM charged forward, its chassis felt superbly taut and well-controlled, coping with the 1,301cc V-twin engine’s huge torque notably better than the old model would have done.

the afternoon’s ride on some wonderfull­y twisting and traffic-free roads in southern Portugal confirmed that the super duke’s new-found composure is welcome on the public highway, too — though, arguably, most appreciate­d at speeds that are best left unrecorded.

Put simply, the harder you ride this subtly restyled but comprehens­ively updated ktM, the more you’re likely to value its developmen­t. Which is timely, given that this year the V-twin faces aggressive new opposition from ducati’s streetfigh­ter V4 and kawasaki’s supercharg­ed Z h2, as well as from familiar four-cylinder foes including aprilia’s tuono V4 1100.

extra engine performanc­e wasn’t the main aim of this update but ktM’s team overhauled the dohc eight-valve unit neverthele­ss, partly to reduce weight. Many internal parts and the crankcases are lightened, saving almost a kilo throughout the engine. the new exhaust also saves a similar amount despite having larger-diameter pipes and an additional catalyser.

the intake system is revamped with a single intake at the centre of the headlight’s insect-like nose, instead of one on each side. this adds some ram-air effect and feeds a bigger airbox, which, in turn, supplies new top-mounted injectors. the result is an increase of three hp to a maximum of 180 hp at 9,500 rpm. More important figures are arguably the near-unchanged torque peak of 140 nm and the fact that over 100 nm is produced from just 3,500 rpm.

as before, the 75-degree V-twin is gloriously flexible, whichever of its three engine modes (sport, street, and reduced-output rain) is selected. a tweak of the throttle sends the bike leaping forward with a muted growl from the silencer, yet the response is as refined as it’s strong and even very low-rev running is smooth and civilized.

on those sweeping Portuguese roads this made the super duke wonderfull­y exhilarati­ng and effortless­ly rapid. ktM’s lead rider wasn’t hanging about and i could tip the bike into blind turns in pursuit, knowing that even from 4,000 rpm it would rocket out again, responding immaculate­ly to the throttle and revving smoothly and hard while i hung on tight and flicked though the revised gearbox with the aid of the flawless shifter.

that engine flexibilit­y was also handy on the circuit, where the ktM was happy to take most turns a gear higher than i might have expected, and fired out of the turn one right-hander in fourth where most bikes would require another downshift. it was seriously motoring just before that, too — indicating almost 270 km/h in top while i sought what little wind protection was available behind the instrument panel.

Wind pressure might become an issue at times because the super duke provides very little protection even by naked bike standards. some launch bikes were fitted with an accessory screen for the road ride but even this didn’t help much. (to be fair, ktM also produce the super duke gt for those wanting to avoid the breeze.)

this bike’s refreshed styling is even more sharply aggressive than before and intended to add some downforce. the riding position is slightly sportier, with the

handlebar set lower and further forward. that was helpful on track and also seemed a good compromise on the street, still giving a comfortabl­y upright position for slower-speed riding.

there’s some adjustabil­ity in the handlebar and plenty of other neat touches. the foot-rests can also be adjusted and you can even fine-tune the gear-lever throw and quickly reverse the shift pattern. less helpfully, the bigger airbox curtails fuel capacity from 18 to 16 litres. that should still mean a range of getting on for 200 km, given that the ktM was averaging almost seven litres/100 km despite plenty of throttle abuse.

its tFt screen is new and improved, part of an electronic­s update that includes revamped and more easily used switchgear plus latest-generation bosch traction control and cornering abs. it all worked seamlessly although it’s disappoint­ing that, as before, you need the optional track Pack to be able to disable the anti-wheelie, at least without turning off traction control too.

enabling the track setting gives a quick choice from three throttle modes, of which even the softest, street, gave a very direct response, although i generally used the slightly sharper sport at Portimao. traction control adjustment is by aprilia-style left thumb and index finger buttons. the system was impressive­ly unobtrusiv­e, level four of the nine giving a useful safety margin with minimal interferen­ce.

the super duke’s chassis changes far more than a first glance at the

retained layout of tubular steel frame and aluminium swing-arm might suggest. that frame features larger-diameter tubes and uses the engine as a stressed member for the first time, which triples torsional rigidity and saves two kilos of weight.

a rear sub-frame of cast aluminium and carbon-fibre replaces the old steel tubes, saving another 1.5 kg. the engine is held higher in the frame, which, ktM say, aids handling and gives a five-mm higher pivot for the single-sided swing-arm, which is redesigned and 15 per cent stiffer.

rear suspension action is completely reworked, now incorporat­ing a rising-rate linkage below the WP shock. this allows the remote-reservoir unit to have a longer action, while reducing rear wheel travel from 156 to 140 mm. up front, the 48-mm WP apex forks give an unchanged 125 mm while now allowing adjustment of preload as well as damping.

steering geometry is tweaked and wheelbase increased by 15 mm to 1,497 mm, but it’s the rear-end changes that make most difference. the super duke always handled fine on the road and it’s now better still, feeling a little more sporty and composed, and steering with impeccable accuracy even when its pilot is putting plenty of body weight through the bars.

a couple of times, when i hit a big bump at speed and felt a jolt through the seat, i wondered whether the outgoing model would have soaked it up slightly better. but i’m not sure about that and most of the time the rider quality was fine and the seat felt impressive­ly comfortabl­e. (a semi-active

option would be nice, but at least the forks feature handy plastic damping knobs at the top of each leg and the shock has a remote preload adjuster.)

and on track the new super duke’s advantage very quickly became clear. the previous model worked all right but was held back by all that rear suspension travel, tending to squat under power and feel a bit loose and wobbly, especially with a tall or heavy rider on board.

this latest bike has no such issues. entering turns and when braking with the full force of brembo’s potent stylema calipers, the ktM’s chassis felt subtly more controlled, aided by that stiffer frame and probably also by the revised geometry and the WP forks’ revised cartridge design.

and on corner exits the super duke was transforme­d. it no longer sat down under accelerati­on but stayed taut — holding its line much better, transmitti­ng all that torque to its sticky, 200-section bridgeston­e s22 much more efficientl­y and generally making the bike both quicker and more enjoyable to ride.

better still was the machine kitted out with full akra system, WP race suspension, and bridgeston­e slicks, on which we got one wide-eyed and hugely entertaini­ng session. louder, firmer, sharper, and doubtless quicker still, it steered superbly and confirmed that the beefed-up frame can handle even more grunt and force than the stock bike provides.

back in the real world the ktM looks competitiv­ely priced although its base figure doesn’t include the quick-shifter or track Pack. both seem almost obligatory in this class and add roughly five per cent to the cost before you get expensivel­y tempted by the PowerParts list.

keyless ignition and cruise control are standard fitment, though, and the super duke costs substantia­lly less than the tuono V4 1100 Factory and streetfigh­ter V4, though more than the base-model aprilia and most other hyper-naked rivals. More to the point, the opposition is facing a distinctly toughened-up ktM.

ever since its début in 2014, the 1290 super duke r has been sharply styled and bursting with V-twin torque and character. it has always been light and sophistica­ted, too, but until now its chassis didn’t quite hit the same heights. that changes with this latest model, which is notably stiffer and better controlled, giving ktM’s V-twin a timely boost with which to take on that growing gang of hyper-naked rivals.

The Super Duke always handled fine on the road and it’s now better still, feeling a little more sporty and composed

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? RIGHT: Revised frame gets larger tubes, engine as a stressed member, and carbon subframe
RIGHT: Revised frame gets larger tubes, engine as a stressed member, and carbon subframe
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? RIGHT: Bigger airbox lowers fuel tank capacity by two litres
RIGHT: Bigger airbox lowers fuel tank capacity by two litres
 ??  ?? LEFT: Steering damper aids stability
LEFT: Steering damper aids stability
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? RIGHT: Ultra-potent Brembo Stylemas clamp down hard
RIGHT: Ultra-potent Brembo Stylemas clamp down hard

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India