Business Standard

Go only for finished flats till May 2017 FRANKLY SPEAKING

- HARSH ROONGTA

Girish, a friend, called up after seeing a full-page advertisem­ent of an under-constructi­on property in a prime location in Mumbai at almost unbelievab­le prices. He was of the opinion that the real estate market had bottomed out and such incredibly low offers may not be available later.

He told me that he had almost finalised a ready-to-move flat of 1,000 square feet for ~3 crore, but this advertisem­ent said that a 1,100 sq ft flat was available for ~2.5 crore. The best part: The location was way more convenient.

I asked him to visit the project site and get full details before he took a decision. He called back the same evening, but was a little less enthusiast­ic. It turned out that there was no cost advantage. The carpet area for the ready-to-move in flat was 700 sq ft (he had got it measured by his own architect) which meant a price of ~42,900 per sq ft for the carpet area. The under-constructi­on property was offering only 600 sq ft despite the advertisem­ent saying that it was a larger flat.

More importantl­y, there were numerous other costs such as service tax, value-added tax, club house, floor rise, preferenti­al view charges and so on. The total cost came to ~3.35 crores. In effect, on a comparable carpet area basis, it was working out at least 30 per cent more expensive than the other flat. Worse still, the project was at a very initial stage. The developer promised delivery in about 3.5 years — in late 2019. Girish believed that it was unlikely to be delivered in this decade. But he felt that the constructi­on delay could work in his favour. He would be paying only around 30 per cent of the total price now and the balance would be spread out based on the progress of the constructi­on. In the meantime, he would get the benefit of price appreciati­on.

I realised it was time to intervene and explain the logic. In the ready-to-move flat, the cost was already fixed. As far as the under-constructi­on flat was concerned, the developers are notorious for increasing the price on various pretexts such as supposed increase in area, better amenities, etc. Buying a product where “what you see is what you get” is very important in an industry such as real estate.

The advantage of delay in constructi­on was also not correct — the interest cost on the initial money paid could far outstrip any benefit, especially if the delay turns into an infinite wait. Also, the interest cost incurred during the constructi­on phase was not tax deductible so its impact was much higher.

A lot of such disadvanta­ges are likely to reduce in severity after the Real Estate Regulation Act comes into force, which is scheduled latest by May 1, 2017. It will ensure compensati­on for delay and prices cannot be changed at will by developers.

If at all you want to buy under-constructi­on property, wait till that date and then buy in a project that is registered under that Act. Meanwhile, prices are unlikely to increase in the seven months remaining for the Act to come into force. Girish bought my logic and decided to buy the ready-to-move flat that he had originally chosen.

After coming into effect, the Real Estate Regulation Act will ensure that developers are unable to take home buyers for a ride

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India